agentleFS
Sign inStart free
peter-tu-zynkrpeter-tu-zynkr/zynkr-skill-builder/skills/2-sales-consultant/consult-session-notes/SKILL.md

consult-session-notes

Skill21 starsChanged 48 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Turn a consulting-session transcript or messy notes — a discovery call or a shadowing observation — into the four-section session summary (Summary Update · Progress · Blockers · What's Next) PLUS a 痛點 ledger (one row per pain actually voiced or observed), filed as a [Notes] Google Doc into the engagement's EXISTING numbered [N] Drive folder with a note on the CRM deal; the ledger is the raw material /consult-brd-writer consumes. Trigger on /consult-session-notes or when Peter says "整理這次客戶訪談筆記", "整理 shadowing 紀錄", "把逐字稿變成會議摘要", "整理客戶會議筆記", "structure this client session", "tidy the shadowing notes", "session summary for the client project" — fire eagerly whenever session material belongs to a CLIENT engagement. Distinct from project-note-specialist (the generic source skill — ONLY tidies text, files nothing, touches no CRM; for non-engagement notes), consult-project-specialist (creates a NEW deal + folder from a sales meeting; THIS skill updates an EXISTING engagement, never creates either), consult-transcriber (upstream — produces the transcript this skill structures), and consult-brd-writer (downstream — consumes the ledger).

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free