agentleFS
peter-tu-zynkrpeter-tu-zynkr/zynkr-skill-builder/skills/0-strategy/planning-tracker-sync/SKILL.md

planning-tracker-sync

Skill21 starsChanged 47 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Team-side weekly heartbeat on the COMPANY Planning Main Tracker (SOR tab of the H1 / H2 / YE cycle) — zynkr-gm's record-side companion. Reads the `<cycle> 專案項目` tab, derives per-item state with zynkr-gm's rules VERBATIM (ENDS_SOON · OVERDUE · UNDATED · STALLED · PROPOSE_DONE · DIRECTION_UNLABELLED — its scripts when installed, else the copied rules) and prints the zh-TW Team Weekly agenda block in one fixed six-section shape (cadence → OVERDUE/ENDS_SOON → UNDATED/掛 All → 各 owner P0/P1 + Δ → PROPOSE_DONE/上週完成 → 還在摸索/已定案) plus per-owner nudge blocks (Gmail DRAFT only on request; never sends). Writes only the OKR-tracker snapshot tabs: `snapshot` refreshes `tracker-latest` and appends to `tracker-snapshots` in the OKR & KPI Tracker — never a Main Tracker cell. `--retro` prints a looking-back draft for planning-prework-pack. Ships no cron; documents a read-only /schedule string. Trigger on /planning-tracker-sync or "H2 tracker 同步", "tracker 同步", "幫我出 Team Weekly 的 tracker 區塊", "tracker 上哪些項目缺日期要 nudge", "誰該被 nudge", "snapshot the tracker", "拍一張 tracker snapshot", "year-end retro draft", "從 tracker 出回顧草稿". NOT the founder GM brief — zynkr-gm owns 「GM 週報 / 這週重點 / 本週 focus / 本月重點 / 哪些 P0 delay 了 / H2 進度盤點 / KPI off-target」 and every company-level focus / roll-up / variance ask. NOT bare 「週報」/"weekly report"/"project weekly" or the Monday cron — project-status-update owns those.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.