frontend-mobile-desktop-testing
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Plan and verify mobile and desktop frontend behavior across React Native, Expo, Flutter, SwiftUI, Compose, Electron, Tauri, simulators, emulators, devices, lifecycle, gestures, windows, shortcuts, IPC, offline, and native accessibility. Use this skill when a non-browser surface requires runtime evidence.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- workshop-gbb/awesome-copilot-adventuresword for word, first seen Sep 5, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- workshop-gbb/awesome-copilot-adventures★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- canvas-designSkill
- evidence-firstSkill
- frontend-dashboard-visualizationSkill
- frontend-experience-coreSkill
- frontend-form-interactionsSkill
- frontend-requirements-and-storiesSkill
- frontend-visual-e2e-testingSkill
- frontend-visual-systemSkill
- ms-presentation-deckSkill
- official-docsSkill
- web-design-reviewerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 22
Read references/device-matrix.md before selecting coverage.
- Distinctive: line 40
Use the repository's established Maestro, Detox, Appium, XCTest, XCUITest, JUnit, Compose UI, Espresso, Flutter, Playwright, or WebdriverIO …
- Distinctive: line 41
Treat platform credentials and device-farm uploads as explicit operational boundaries.
- Distinctive: line 45
Do not install a device runner, simulator, SDK, or paid service implicitly.
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not claim native iOS or Android implementation capability without a representative pilot.
- Distinctive: line 47
Do not treat web DOM or a desktop renderer test as proof of native shell, IPC, packaging, or OS behavior.
- Distinctive: line 48
Do not capture real notifications, contacts, files, photos, accounts, or personal data in fixtures or evidence.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Frontend mobile and desktop testing
Select platform-appropriate evidence for native, hybrid, and desktop-shell experiences without pretending browser tests prove device or operating-system behavior.
When to invoke
- "Create a device test matrix for this mobile app."
- "Validate React Native, Expo, Flutter, SwiftUI, or Compose behavior."
- "Test Electron or Tauri window, shortcut, IPC, and offline flows."
- "Review lifecycle, deep links, permissions, gestures, and safe areas."
- "Plan simulator, emulator, and real-device accessibility evidence."
Profile detection
Detect framework, versions, native projects, build tools, package identifiers, navigation, permissions, deep links, update mechanism, test runners, CI, supported OS versions, architectures, and approved devices.
Read references/device-matrix.md before selecting coverage. A profile may be not applicable only with evidence.
Mobile testing
Read references/mobile-testing.md.
Cover when applicable: cold/warm start, foreground/background, termination, state restoration, deep links, permissions, safe areas, orientation, keyboard, gestures with alternatives, offline sync, conflict, push, app updates, dynamic type, VoiceOver/TalkBack, memory, battery, and frame behavior.
Desktop testing
Read references/desktop-testing.md.
Cover when applicable: first launch, window creation, resizing, minimum size, restore, multiple windows, menus, shortcuts, dialogs, file access, drag/drop alternatives, IPC trust boundaries, offline, updates, packaging, OS themes, high contrast, and screen-reader behavior.
Evidence rules
- Separate unit/component, simulator/emulator, real device, packaged build, and OS-specific evidence.
- Record OS, device/model, architecture, runtime, app build, locale, permissions, network, accessibility settings, and lifecycle state.
- Use the repository's established Maestro, Detox, Appium, XCTest, XCUITest, JUnit, Compose UI, Espresso, Flutter, Playwright, or WebdriverIO setup.
- Treat platform credentials and device-farm uploads as explicit operational boundaries.
Limits
- Do not install a device runner, simulator, SDK, or paid service implicitly.
- Do not claim native iOS or Android implementation capability without a representative pilot.
- Do not treat web DOM or a desktop renderer test as proof of native shell, IPC, packaging, or OS behavior.
- Do not capture real notifications, contacts, files, photos, accounts, or personal data in fixtures or evidence.
Progressive disclosure and bundled resources
- references/device-matrix.md: risk-based matrix.
- references/mobile-testing.md: mobile lifecycle and accessibility.
- references/desktop-testing.md: windows, native bridge, and packaging.
- evals/evals.json: representative output evaluations.
Output template
## Mobile/desktop test result
**Status:** ready | needs environment | blocked
**Profile:** <framework, platform, version>
### Matrix
| OS/device/build | Lifecycle/window state | Input/accessibility | Scenario | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
### Evidence gaps
- <real device, packaging, credential, store, or OS check>Quality gate
- Framework, platform versions, build type, support matrix, runners, and operational boundaries were detected.
- Lifecycle, permissions, deep links, safe areas, input, offline, update, and accessibility behavior is covered when applicable.
- Window, menu, shortcut, dialog, file, IPC, packaging, and OS behavior is covered for desktop profiles.
- Simulator/emulator, real-device, packaged-build, and OS evidence remain distinct.
- Environment metadata and safe synthetic data make results reproducible.
- Unsupported profiles and unavailable evidence are explicit.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

