frontend-dashboard-visualization
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Design and review dashboards, KPI surfaces, operational consoles, tables, chart selection, analytical interaction, and accessible data visualization from real questions and data properties. Use this skill when frontend work involves metrics, charts, monitoring, reporting, or data storytelling.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- workshop-gbb/awesome-copilot-adventuresword for word, first seen Sep 5, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- workshop-gbb/awesome-copilot-adventures★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- canvas-designSkill
- evidence-firstSkill
- frontend-experience-coreSkill
- frontend-form-interactionsSkill
- frontend-mobile-desktop-testingSkill
- frontend-requirements-and-storiesSkill
- frontend-visual-e2e-testingSkill
- frontend-visual-systemSkill
- ms-presentation-deckSkill
- official-docsSkill
- web-design-reviewerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Start with the user's analytical question and the real data shape, then choose the simplest encoding that supports an accurate decision.
- Distinctive: line 29
Never invent a metric or use fictional production values unless the user explicitly requests labeled synthetic fixture data.
- Distinctive: line 33
Read references/chart-selection.md.
- Distinctive: line 35
Read references/dashboard-patterns.md for filter, provenance, density, and state behavior.
- Distinctive: line 48
Use assets/operational-dashboard-review.md and assets/human-review-checklist.md.
- Distinctive: line 52
Do not select a chart because it is fashionable or available in a library.
- Distinctive: line 53
Do not infer causation from correlation or precision from decorative animation.
- Distinctive: line 54
Do not add a new chart library when the installed one satisfies the contract.
- Distinctive: line 55
Do not expose restricted raw data or enable exports without product policy.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Frontend dashboard visualization
Start with the user's analytical question and the real data shape, then choose the simplest encoding that supports an accurate decision.
When to invoke
- "Design an operational dashboard from these real metrics."
- "Choose the right chart for this analytical question."
- "Review this KPI page for misleading or inaccessible visualization."
- "Define dashboard filters, tables, drilldowns, and failure states."
- "Test a chart-heavy frontend with realistic edge cases."
Analytical contract
For every metric or visualization, record:
- question or decision supported;
- metric name, definition, unit, time window, comparison baseline, update time, and provenance;
- dimensions, cardinality, ordering, missingness, precision, and uncertainty;
- target audience and required scanning or exact-value behavior;
- filters, drilldowns, exports, annotations, thresholds, and access limits;
- loading, empty, delayed, partial, stale, unavailable, error, and recovery states.
Never invent a metric or use fictional production values unless the user explicitly requests labeled synthetic fixture data.
Chart and table selection
Read references/chart-selection.md. Prefer tables for exact values and operational scanning. Use charts only when position, length, area, color, or another encoding improves the stated question.
Read references/dashboard-patterns.md for filter, provenance, density, and state behavior. Read references/accessible-data-visualization.md for summaries, tables, keyboard, focus, and non-color alternatives.
Criteria
- Titles and summaries reflect active filters, time windows, and comparison context.
- Zero, missing, delayed, partial, stale, and unavailable data remain distinct.
- Dates, timezones, currency, percentages, precision, and large values are consistent.
- Dense labels, negative values, outliers, long series, empty ranges, and loading do not create misleading output.
- Interactive controls have accessible names, keyboard behavior, visible state, and reversible outcomes.
- Color is not the only series, threshold, selection, or status cue.
- Download or underlying tables appear only when product and data policy permit them.
- Rendering cost, large collections, and update frequency fit the product's runtime budget.
Use assets/operational-dashboard-review.md and assets/human-review-checklist.md.
Limits
- Do not select a chart because it is fashionable or available in a library.
- Do not infer causation from correlation or precision from decorative animation.
- Do not add a new chart library when the installed one satisfies the contract.
- Do not expose restricted raw data or enable exports without product policy.
Output template
## Dashboard visualization result
**Status:** ready | needs revision | blocked
### Analytical contract
| Question | Metric/data | Context and provenance | Audience action |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
### Encodings and interactions
| Need | Selected table/chart | Why | Accessible alternative | Edge states |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
### Validation
| Fixture/state | Behavioral check | Visual/a11y check | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |Quality gate
- Every visualization traces to a real analytical question and data shape.
- Metrics include units, windows, baselines, freshness, and provenance.
- Zero, missing, partial, delayed, stale, unavailable, and error states remain distinguishable.
- Exact-value, accessible-summary, keyboard, color-independent, and edge-data behavior is defined.
- Library and rendering-cost decisions use repository evidence.
- The human review checklist has no unresolved blocked item.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

