agentleFS
paranoidandroid2124paranoidandroid2124/sounds-like-a-skill-issue/skills/skill-issue/SKILL.md

skill-issue

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Audit and slim an existing Agent Skill by separating durable capability delta from generic model knowledge, stale facts, repeated warnings, and ritual. Use when creating, updating, reviewing, or modernizing a SKILL.md; reducing instruction or token burden; resolving overlapping triggers; or deciding whether to keep, trim, measure, or delete a skill. Do not use to shorten ordinary prose or source code unrelated to agent skills, run an upgrade-only compatibility canary, or prove an efficacy claim; those need a canary or paired trial.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions4 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 4

    1. eliasstravik/skills★ 22same name
    2. SahilBachu/skill-issue★ 7same name
    3. Gjusev/skill-issue★ 1same name
    4. pavitra-infocusp/skill-issue★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read the target SKILL.md and every resource it directly routes to.

    line 15
  2. Very specific:

    Run node scripts/audit-skill.mjs <skill-directory> from this skill directory when Node.js is available.

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    Read references/decision-rubric.md when a classification is disputed or the skill mixes domain knowledge and workflow.

    line 37
  4. Distinctive:

    Never trim input validation at trust boundaries, security controls, accessibility basics, error handling that prevents data loss, or an …

    line 40
  5. Very specific:

    Put all positive triggers and nearby exclusions in description.

    line 50
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep the body imperative and focused on one job.

    line 51
  7. Distinctive:

    Keep scripts only for repeated or deterministic work.

    line 54
  8. Distinctive:

    Run the platform's skill validator when available.

    line 61
  9. Distinctive:

    before/after instruction cost.

    line 79

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Skill Issue

Reduce the skill to the smallest intervention that demonstrably improves its target task.

Assume the model is innocent until the skill proves otherwise.

Inspect

  1. Read the target SKILL.md and every resource it directly routes to.
  2. Identify the target task, supported harnesses, trust boundaries, and observable completion condition.
  3. Run node scripts/audit-skill.mjs <skill-directory> from this skill directory when Node.js is available. Treat its findings as leads, not semantic verdicts.
  4. Establish what the current base model already does without the skill. Do not infer this from reputation or model version.

Classify

Assign every material instruction one disposition:

  • Keep: non-obvious domain facts, exact tool routing, trust or data-loss boundaries, deterministic operations, output contracts, and observable verification.
  • Trim: generic advice, duplicated defaults, repeated warnings, fixed model or tool assumptions, and process whose cost exceeds the failure risk.
  • Delete: instructions with no target capability, conflicts with the current environment, or no measurable benefit over baseline.
  • Measure: plausible value that lacks paired evidence.

Read references/decision-rubric.md when a classification is disputed or the skill mixes domain knowledge and workflow.

Never trim input validation at trust boundaries, security controls, accessibility basics, error handling that prevents data loss, or an explicit user requirement.

Patch

  1. Require name and description. Preserve recognized optional or harness-specific fields when they carry licensing, compatibility, tool restrictions, security boundaries, or useful metadata. Remove a field only after classifying its behavior and portability cost.
  2. Put all positive triggers and nearby exclusions in description.
  3. Keep the body imperative and focused on one job.
  4. Move conditional detail one level down into references/; do not duplicate it in the body.
  5. Keep scripts only for repeated or deterministic work. Add no dependency when the standard library suffices.
  6. Preserve user-authored behavior unless the user asked for an edit. For an audit-only request, return the patch proposal without changing files.

Verify

  1. Run the platform's skill validator when available.
  2. Rerun audit-skill.mjs and report before/after lines, words, estimated tokens, resources, and unresolved findings. Include the exact command and counting method; retain the raw report or its path when results will be compared.
  3. For a material behavioral change, use $trust-me-bro when available. Otherwise run the same pinned task once without the skill and once with it, keep contexts isolated, and verify outputs from artifacts rather than self-reports.
  4. Mark efficacy as unproven until a paired trial supports it.

Return

Lead with keep, trim, delete, or measure. Include:

  • the capability the skill uniquely supplies;
  • proposed or applied cuts with reasons;
  • preserved safety boundaries;
  • before/after instruction cost;
  • the command, counting convention, and raw artifact behind those numbers;
  • validation and trial evidence;
  • remaining uncertainty.

Stars, prose length, and the implementer's confidence are not evidence.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.