agentleFS
paranoidandroid2124paranoidandroid2124/sounds-like-a-skill-issue/skills/this-is-fine/SKILL.md

this-is-fine

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Run a small pinned regression suite to detect whether an existing Agent Skill's triggers, tool routing, permissions, output contract, or versioned guidance drifted after a model, harness, tool, or API update. Use when upgrading a model or agent, checking a release, scheduling compatibility checks, or investigating why a formerly working skill changed behavior. Do not use for general skill slimming or to prove broad efficacy; those need a structural audit or paired trial.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the skill and its last known-good canary record.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Use fixtures or sandboxes.

    line 20
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep task inputs, permissions, tools, reasoning, and timeout stable.

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    Run the last known-good environment first when practical, then the candidate environment.

    line 35
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not rewrite unrelated guidance or silently update expected output to make the run green.

    line 54
  6. Very specific:

    Use $trust-me-bro when available before claiming the new version improves efficacy.

    line 56

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

This Is Fine

Detect compatibility drift cheaply. Do not turn a canary into a full benchmark.

The coffee is optional. The pinned regression cases are not.

Prepare

  1. Read the skill and its last known-good canary record.
  2. Pin the old and new model or harness versions when both remain available. Otherwise pin the new environment and compare against stored expected observations.
  3. Select five to ten cheap cases from references/canary-contract.md.
  4. Use fixtures or sandboxes. Do not let a canary mutate production or publish externally.

Run

Keep task inputs, permissions, tools, reasoning, and timeout stable. Use fresh contexts and capture raw evidence for:

  • trigger activation and near-miss non-activation;
  • preferred tool route and fallback;
  • approval or destructive-action boundary;
  • output schema or completion contract;
  • one version-sensitive fact or command;
  • one known historical failure.

Run the last known-good environment first when practical, then the candidate environment. A missing old runtime is a limitation, not permission to invent a comparison.

Classify

  • Trigger drift: activation becomes too broad, too narrow, or ambiguous.
  • Capability drift: the same route no longer achieves the outcome.
  • Tool drift: a tool, argument, path, or fallback changed.
  • Safety drift: approval, validation, or write boundaries weaken.
  • Knowledge drift: pinned instructions conflict with current primary sources.
  • Harness drift: discovery, progressive disclosure, or resource loading changes.

Act

  1. Fail the canary on any safety regression or broken core outcome.
  2. Propose the smallest correction at the source of drift.
  3. Do not rewrite unrelated guidance or silently update expected output to make the run green.
  4. Use $trust-me-bro when available before claiming the new version improves efficacy. Otherwise compare the same pinned task in isolated baseline and candidate contexts with one declared verifier. A canary alone never proves uplift.

Return

Report the environment delta, case-by-case observation, raw evidence, drift class, severity, smallest proposed fix, and whether release should pass, warn, or block.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.