positive-framing
Skill14 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when editing client-facing IDEA and PROPOSAL prose — reframes loss-framed phrases as gain-framed and enforces section-aware verb tense rules
In this repository50 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adr-conventionSkill
- architecture-vocabularySkill
- backlog-externalSkill
- backlog-localSkill
- backlogSkill
- checkpointsSkill
- design-principlesSkill
- domain-glossarySkill
- git-practicesSkill
- grounded-claimsSkill
- knowledge-checkSkill
- policy-riskSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- skill-awarenessSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- token-efficientSkill
- triageSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- workflow-bugSkill
- workflow-checkSkill
- workflow-commitSkill
- workflow-contractsSkill
- workflow-debugSkill
- workflow-decisionsSkill
- workflow-docsSkill
- workflow-doctorSkill
- workflow-epicSkill
- workflow-featureSkill
- workflow-flow-fix-pipelineSkill
- workflow-flowSkill
- workflow-grillSkill
- workflow-handoffSkill
- workflow-ideaSkill
- workflow-implementSkill
- workflow-planSkill
- workflow-proposalSkill
- workflow-prSkill
- workflow-refineSkill
- workflow-researchSkill
- workflow-reviewSkill
- workflow-startSkill
- workflow-statusSkill
- workflow-tech-reviewSkill
- workflow-update-workflowSkill
- workflow-validateSkill
- workflow-worktreeSkill
- workflow-yoloSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use these rules when editing narrative prose in /virtual-team:idea and /virtual-team:proposal outputs.
- Distinctive: line 16
Before: "without throwing away the current code"
- Distinctive: line 17
After: "leveraging your existing codebase"
- Very specific: line 29
Allowed: when anchored by a concrete quantity, named entities, or since [date]: "we have helped 40+ companies", "since 2018, we have …
- Distinctive: line 30
Not allowed: when vague: "we have been delivering for years", "the team has worked with enterprises".
- Distinctive: line 32
Mechanical heuristic: if removing the present perfect and substituting simple past or simple present preserves the meaning, switch.
- Very specific: line 52
When /proposal invokes this skill with a --target-role value, honor that profile's Words to avoid: list at commands/proposal.md:497-541 …
- Distinctive: line 57
If the section is in the hard-exclusion list, return unchanged.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Positive Framing
Use these rules when editing narrative prose in /virtual-team:idea and /virtual-team:proposal outputs. Reframe what the client gains, not what they avoid losing. Enforce one governing tense per section. Never touch the hard-exclusion blocks.
Out of scope: /virtual-team:feature, /virtual-team:epic, ADRs, plans, technical reviews. Those need literal negation to function.
Framing rules
- Replace negation-of-loss with affirmation-of-gain. Identify what the negation is protecting against; name the protected thing directly as a positive state. See
references/pattern-catalog.mdfor 22+ seed transforms across 5 categories.- Before: "without throwing away the current code"
- After: "leveraging your existing codebase"
- No double negations. "Not uncommon" → "common". "Not without merit" → "has merit".
- Lead each major section with the gain, not the escape. The first sentence of Executive Summary, Solution, and Scope of Work names a positive outcome.
Wiebe exception: preserve negation when it names a recognized pain the reader already feels ("you'll never miss a deadline again"). Acknowledging pain before dissolving it is gain-framing, not loss-framing.
Tense rules
- Simple present for capabilities, scope, methodology. "We deliver", "the engagement includes".
- Simple past for case studies and credentials. "We built", "we reduced churn 30%".
- Simple future or present-as-future for timelines. "Phase 1 begins June 3".
- Present perfect is conditional, not banned:
- Allowed when anchored by a concrete quantity, named entities, or
since [date]: "we have helped 40+ companies", "since 2018, we have delivered 60+ engagements". - Not allowed when vague: "we have been delivering for years", "the team has worked with enterprises".
- Never in present-perfect-continuous form (
has been -ing,have been -ing). - Mechanical heuristic: if removing the present perfect and substituting simple past or simple present preserves the meaning, switch. If the sentence loses its continuing-relevance bridge, keep it.
- Allowed when anchored by a concrete quantity, named entities, or
- One governing tense per section. Tense shifts only on genuine time-reference change. Track Record / Credentials is the one section where anchored present perfect is the default.
See references/tense-by-section.md for the section-by-section table.
Voice rules
- Active voice in accountability statements. "We deliver X by date Y", not "X will be delivered". Passive acceptable in policy lines ("Invoices are due net 30").
- Modal-verb audit. Soft-flag
may/might/could/should/wouldin client-facing sentences. Hard-flag stacked modals ("could potentially be considered").
Hard exclusions — do not edit
/proposalNot Included sections — exclusions require literal negation/proposalRisks / Assumptions / Dependencies — threat language is appropriate/ideaRisks, Assumptions, and "Not Doing" sections- Tables, code blocks, REQ IDs, cost figures, dates, structural bullet labels
- Frontmatter, headers, any markdown structural element
Voice Profile interaction
When /proposal invokes this skill with a --target-role value, honor that profile's **Words to avoid:** list at commands/proposal.md:497-541 even when the pattern catalog suggests a banned word. For example, the cto profile bans "leverage" — substitute "build on" or "extend" instead. Voice Profile constraints override catalog defaults.
Application protocol
- Identify section type (Executive Summary, Scope, Risks, Not Included, Track Record, etc.).
- If the section is in the hard-exclusion list, return unchanged.
- Apply framing rules 1-3, consulting
references/pattern-catalog.mdwhen a phrase resists direct transformation. - Apply tense rules 4-8, consulting
references/tense-by-section.mdfor the section's governing tense. - Apply voice rules 9-10.
- Cross-check every replacement against the active Voice Profile's forbidden-word list. If a replacement hits the list, choose an alternative or skip the transform.
Integration
This skill is loaded by:
commands/proposal.md— invoked as a pre-pass before the humanizer in the Editorial Pipelinecommands/idea.md— invoked in Round 5 as the sole editorial passskills/skill-awareness/SKILL.md— registered in the context-to-skill mapping
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

