orbyn-worktree
Skill4 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Manage local task branches, private contribution storage when supported and Git worktree isolation; use sibling <repo>-wt directories, purpose-based names and preservation before cleanup.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kinqsradio/orbyn-fullstack-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- kinqsradio/orbyn-fullstack-skills★ 4100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- automate-meSkill
- figure-it-outSkill
- howSkill
- interrogateSkill
- language-best-practicesSkill
- motion-matchSkill
- orbyn-ai-applicationSkill
- orbyn-backend-designSkill
- orbyn-ci-designSkill
- orbyn-content-designSkill
- orbyn-data-migrationSkill
- orbyn-planSkill
- orbyn-researchSkill
- orbyn-security-auditSkill
- orbyn-security-remediationSkill
- orbyn-setupSkill
- orbyn-skill-creatorSkill
- orbyn-stack-selectionSkill
- orbyn-ui-designSkill
- orbyn-upstream-reviewSkill
- orbyn-workflowSkill
- product-illustrationSkill
- rea-analysis-optimizationSkill
- rea-changelog-updateSkill
- rea-ci-tests-auditSkill
- rea-tool-designSkill
- reflectSkill
- reverse-engineer-anythingSkill
- show-me-your-workSkill
- social-contentSkill
- social-previewSkill
- stack-diagramSkill
- tddSkill
- technical-illustrationSkill
- unslopSkill
- whySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this skill when a task needs checkout isolation, the user requests a worktree, or an existing worktree needs reconciliation/cleanup.
- Very specific: line 17
Read the repository's work mode from harness.py resolve first.
- Distinctive: line 37
Before creating a checkout, inspect registered trees, canonical repository/remotes, host attachments and bindings, and any existing …
- Very specific: line 69
Use lowercase letters, digits and hyphens for a short directory slug, normally under 64 characters.
- Distinctive: line 88
Keep work local by default.
- Very specific: line 100
Create a new branch from a verified base with git worktree add -b <branch> <path> <base>.
- Distinctive: line 106
Use the selected worktree as the working directory for every subsequent edit/check.
- Distinctive: line 107
After selecting or switching checkout, reread nested instructions and re-resolve search roots there under action scope.
- Very specific: line 114
If the host denies Git metadata writes, preserve the patch and report delivery as blocked.
- Distinctive: line 119
Before expensive runs, use the CI owner's feature-worktree gates.
- Distinctive: line 130
Never delete another owner's work.
- Distinctive: line 140
After a merge, retire the worktree in the same closeout when you have cleanup authority: the tool moves the whole folder, ignored files …
- Very specific: line 143
Keep a merged tree only with a named reason and review event, recorded in a HOLD.json at its root.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Worktree ownership and lifecycle
Use this skill when a task needs checkout isolation, the user requests a worktree, or an existing worktree needs reconciliation/cleanup. The workflow selects it from the ordinary task request, without a separate invocation. Follow the consuming project's instructions, requested checkout and host permissions. A small clear edit can stay in its current checkout.
Create a worktree by work mode
Read the repository's work mode from harness.py resolve first. simple: no
worktree; edit in the current checkout. isolated: one worktree per task. parallel:
one worktree per active task, at most max_active at once, the rest queued. A small
clear edit stays in the current checkout in every mode, and a chat instruction such
as "just do it here" overrides the mode for that task. parallel leaves more trees
to retire, so run the cleanup report at every closeout.
Resolve the repository and owner first
Inspect the current checkout, branch, HEAD, tracked/untracked changes and
git worktree list --porcelain. Resolve the primary clone and common repository
from Git registration and the task; the current directory may be a linked worktree.
A linked worktree's .git is normally a pointer: do not treat it as an independent
clone or derive another -wt root from it.
Preserve unrelated changes and outputs. Do not stash, reset, switch another owner's checkout, copy dirty files or move existing worktrees merely to enforce this convention.
Reuse before cloning or replacing
Before creating a checkout, inspect registered trees, canonical repository/remotes, host attachments and bindings, and any existing reference cache. Reuse a worktree only when its repository, task owner, branch, source and local work fit this task. Confirm that no active session still holds a clean directory before reusing it.
Continue the same task/PR in its owned branch and checkout through review and corrections. Start a new independent task from the verified current default branch and a stack from its exact reviewed dependency. Do not use a historical task branch just because it is current, or create a clone per agent/day/retry.
Sibling location and names
For a primary clone <parent>/<repo>, the default root is its sibling
<parent>/<repo-slug>-wt/. Use a stable lowercase hyphenated repo slug; reuse an
existing established sibling root rather than creating a case-only alternative.
Each worktree has one direct child directory named for its purpose slug, not the
branch's slash-separated path:
orbyn-fullstack-skills/repo/
orbyn/ primary clone
orbyn-wt/
task-rescheduling/ feat/task-rescheduling
save-retry/ fix/save-retry
worktree-policy/ chore/worktree-policyTargets use the library-root ignored repo/ workspace by default under the
nested repository contract:
orbyn-fullstack-skills/repo/widget uses sibling repo/widget-wt/<purpose>/.
An explicit user location or an established consuming-project policy wins.
Use lowercase letters, digits and hyphens for a short directory slug, normally
under 64 characters. Use neutral branch prefixes such as feat/, fix/, chore/,
docs/ or refactor/. Do not use agent, assistant, vendor or model branding in a
new branch or directory name. Avoid path separators, traversal, spaces, Windows
device names and case-only distinctions.
Inspect collisions before choosing a name. If the existing path/branch is unrelated
or still owned, choose a distinct purpose or a suffix such as -2; never overwrite
a directory, reuse a foreign branch or use force to bypass Git's already-checked-out
protection. Keep existing legacy paths/branch names intact.
Keep task branches local and publish deliberately
A worktree and its branch are local Git state; they need no branch on the company's remote. Reuse one owned task branch and worktree through implementation, correction and review instead of creating one per agent, phase or retry. Never push every delegate branch. Serialize operations on shared Git refs, remotes and configuration under one owner.
Keep work local by default. Before any push, follow contribution storage. A local branch is recoverable only while its checkout/Git data remain; preserve valuable unpushed work before cleanup.
Create and verify the selected checkout
Resolve the requested base revision before writes. Continue an existing task/PR
from its actual branch or reviewed commit. For new work, use the project's verified
default branch/ref, not an unrelated current feature branch or a stale local main.
Fetch only when available and authorized; label an offline/cached base as such.
Create a new branch from a verified base with
git worktree add -b <branch> <path> <base>. Reuse an existing branch with
worktree add <path> <branch> only after ownership/checkout inspection. Avoid -B,
--force and duplicate branch checkouts. Verify the final path, branch, base/HEAD
and status before editing.
Use the selected worktree as the working directory for every subsequent edit/check. After selecting or switching checkout, reread nested instructions and re-resolve search roots there under action scope.
Preserve project environment files; do not automatically copy secrets or run setup hooks from source. Worktrees share Git objects and may still share databases, ports, fixtures or external services: assign those separately.
If the host denies Git metadata writes, preserve the patch and report delivery as
blocked. Never rewrite .git, supply an alternate index or bypass the sandbox.
Designate task verification
Before expensive runs, use the CI owner's feature-worktree gates. Name focused checks, exclusions and conditions for widening in the existing task brief. A new worktree adds no entire-app suite, hosted CI or deployment.
Preserve before cleanup
At a meaningful handoff or terminal delivery result, apply the single task closeout method: reconcile source, commit, push, PR and resource states, decide retention with a reason/review trigger, and assess exact-path retirement separately from permission to remove it.
Never delete another owner's work; unknown ownership means hold. A squash merge or
clean status alone does not clear a tree for removal. Retire a tree only through
worktree_retire.py, which moves the whole folder to the system Trash and then clears
that one Git registration (a restored folder is files only). apply proves only
what the report shows: landing, a clean tree, no hidden changes, nothing open and no
hold. The owning task or a person still judges ownership, dependent work, shared
resources, live previews and recovery, and records any open question as a HOLD.json.
A refusal has no automatic force fallback; local/remote ref deletion and tracking
prune remain separate.
After a merge, retire the worktree in the same closeout
when you have cleanup authority: the tool moves the whole folder, ignored files
included, to the Trash, so never hand-run git worktree remove on a live tree, which deletes them.
Keep a merged tree only with a named reason and
review event, recorded in a HOLD.json at its root. At closeout, before creating a
worktree and when harness.py resolve reports low disk, run the workspace cleanup:
worktree_retire.py report, then apply. It trashes only finished worktrees, rebuildable
caches and idle output, archive and references; everything else in repo/ is report-only.
Return the selected path/base/head, verified delivery state, retained resources, recovery pointers and actual closeout disposition. A dry run changes nothing.
Read when needed
- Pushing, forks, private storage, backups or a public PR: contribution storage.
- Recloning, replacing a checkout or an empty partial cache: checkout replacement.
- In-place, external or bare layouts, delegate branches, unattended runs, denied metadata writes, required dirty primary changes, host worktree tools, search results from another checkout, required statuses at delivery or a worked command example: checkout setup.
- Preview/evidence storage, server/volume ownership or retention classes: artifact lifecycle.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

