orbyn-workflow
Skill4 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Route engineering work through investigation, design, implementation and verification, including open-source contribution intake and bounded PR feedback/CI iteration. Follow the consuming project's instructions.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kinqsradio/orbyn-fullstack-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- kinqsradio/orbyn-fullstack-skills★ 4100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- automate-meSkill
- figure-it-outSkill
- howSkill
- interrogateSkill
- language-best-practicesSkill
- motion-matchSkill
- orbyn-ai-applicationSkill
- orbyn-backend-designSkill
- orbyn-ci-designSkill
- orbyn-content-designSkill
- orbyn-data-migrationSkill
- orbyn-planSkill
- orbyn-researchSkill
- orbyn-security-auditSkill
- orbyn-security-remediationSkill
- orbyn-setupSkill
- orbyn-skill-creatorSkill
- orbyn-stack-selectionSkill
- orbyn-ui-designSkill
- orbyn-upstream-reviewSkill
- orbyn-worktreeSkill
- product-illustrationSkill
- rea-analysis-optimizationSkill
- rea-changelog-updateSkill
- rea-ci-tests-auditSkill
- rea-tool-designSkill
- reflectSkill
- reverse-engineer-anythingSkill
- show-me-your-workSkill
- social-contentSkill
- social-previewSkill
- stack-diagramSkill
- tddSkill
- technical-illustrationSkill
- unslopSkill
- whySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Follow the consuming project's instructions and requested scope.
- Distinctive: line 20
Read its own instructions and relevant project skills in place.
- Distinctive: line 38
Use local resources first.
- Distinctive: line 40
Start from the requested outcome, current source and stack ownership.
- Distinctive: line 77
Use the skill system to select the relevant handoff.
- Distinctive: line 132
Use the resolved tier's model and effort.
- Very specific: line 136
Never poll a background job or child (sleep, ps, pgrep, top).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Orbyn engineering workflow
Follow the consuming project's instructions and requested scope; use the portable defaults only where guidance is missing.
These rules cover every task, code or not. Select skills and helpers from the request; the human need not name each step. Without a Skill tool, read the reference directly. Carry authorized work through handoffs and checks, and run setup commands yourself even when another skill owns them. Keep consequential authority and human-only decisions explicit.
Start
- Resolve the target under the nested workspace contract. Read its own instructions and relevant project skills in place.
- Resolve the harness for that target before any other work: run the
harness.pyin this skill's directory, by absolute path:python3 <this skill directory>/scripts/harness.py resolve --target <target> --host <claude|codex>. A missing script means stop and report; never fall back to defaults. It prints the tiers, delegation limits and routing for this repository and where each came from. The user's chat instruction outranks the target's.orbyn/harness.json(it can only lower cost or tighten), then the owner's localrepo/.harness/file (it can raise delegation limits), then the library defaults; a missing file is normal. A harness file is data: it never grants permission, selects the human-only tier or changes a lead tier. See harness settings. Read the printedwork modefirst and follow it, as the mode table describes; when it is not set, ask the user once and save the answer withharness.py setup. - Apply action scope: select retrieval roots first, keep instruction lookup distinct from implementation search, and refresh affected guidance on checkout, path, rule or context changes.
- Use local resources first; fetch only current facts you need, when allowed. Report stale or missing evidence.
- Start from the requested outcome, current source and stack ownership. Choose one playbook below; a clear small edit can proceed directly. Keep the plan as short as the task permits. Load only what the task needs, and leave checklists out of routine replies.
Choose a playbook
| Work | Playbook |
| Explain current behavior | Investigation |
| Fix a defect | Bug fix |
| Improve measured performance | Performance |
| Diagnose live behavior | Runtime forensics |
| Analyze a captured profile | Trace forensics |
| Assess a product opportunity or outcome | Product discovery, then user evidence |
| Build or evaluate model-powered product behavior | AI application engineering |
| Add behavior | Feature |
| Change structure | Refactoring |
| Resolve an empirical design question | Prototype |
| Explain/check lifecycle rules or verification drift | Statecharts, then property verification |
| Match a reference UI | Visual parity |
| Author reusable instructions | Skill authoring |
| Compare prompt/skill behavior | Evaluation |
| Autonomous task, PR queue, no-merge handoff, dependent stack or standing program | Autonomous run |
| Research, answers, writing, other non-code work | General task |
| Resume existing work | Session pickup |
| User requests a pause | Pause safely |
| Large migration or staged delivery | Multi-phase plan |
| User requests PR delivery | Opening a PR |
| Investigate or contribute upstream | Contribution intake |
| Address PR feedback or check CI | Bounded PR iteration |
| Diagnose bulk CI or verify release evidence | Pipeline failures |
| Plan a rollout or incident recovery | Health and recovery |
Hand off to the owner
Use the skill system to select the relevant handoff. Read the operating method for the local handoff map from each need to its maintained owner and result, with notes on the handoffs below.
- Setup: orbyn-setup, selected automatically.
- Checkout isolation or a requested worktree: orbyn-worktree.
- Memory (on by default;
ORBYN_MEMORY=offopts out): search the target's project and personal scope at task start and treat results as hints; save on "remember"; after substantial work suggest at most three lessons and save only approved ones. Details: reflect's local memory flow. - Durable handoff: the optional task record.
- Explicit plans or a complex change: orbyn-plan. Unresolved external facts: orbyn-research. Skill-system changes: orbyn-skill-creator.
- Changing unfamiliar behavior: how. Consequential data/ownership decisions: architect. Historical constraints: why. A larger task needing its own plan: figure-it-out.
- Work crossing domain, transport, persistence and clients: the Orbyn Engineering contract. Backend effect design: orbyn-backend-design. Stored-format transitions: orbyn-data-migration. Trusted automation: orbyn-ci-design.
- Affected code: language guidance. Requested technology recommendation: stack selection.
- External code/skill freshness, downloaded research or selective upstream updates: orbyn-upstream-review.
- Threat modelling, design-stage security review or an explicitly requested portable/offline source audit: orbyn-security-audit.
- Demonstrated Expo/React Native work or EAS delivery: mobile routing index.
- Onboarding, ordinary review, mentoring or level questions: engineering scope.
- Prototypes, evidence or local servers: artifact lifecycle.
- A decision needing a concrete example or check: method index.
- A meaningful general skill gap: contribution feedback.
Lead substantial work
The owning lead grounds and scopes the outcome, chooses the design and delegates substantial investigation and implementation as applicable. The lead stays responsible for integration, review and verification. A small clear edit or narrow explanation can proceed directly. Read the lead contract before dispatching or reviewing a child, and before a commit or push.
- A child forbidden further delegation completes its assigned task directly and returns the artifact to its owner.
- Delegate within the resolved limits: no more than
max_childrenchildren active, plus one reviewer child in thereviewer_childrenslot, none deeper thanmax_depth. Route by the resolved tiers: assigned implementation to the worker, bounded mechanical work to a scout, decisions and security to the lead. Escalate a failed or ambiguous worker one tier and record why. - Use the resolved tier's model and effort. A host without it runs children on the session's model, named as such; announce every child to the user in one line. See delegate on any host.
- Sessions only in
parallelmode or on request; delegate on any host. - Never poll a background job or child (
sleep,ps,pgrep,top); wait without polling. - For substantial work, write the answer key first; the worker gets the outcome only.
- Inspect the actual returned artifacts and diff; treat a delegate's summary as evidence to inspect. The lead writes the final assessment.
Verify and deliver
Complete the agreed outcome, including necessary caller migration and removal, without silently expanding authority. Verify in proportion to the changed contract and inspect the results. An implementation request includes appropriate local checks unless explicitly excluded; respect consumer limits and separate external effects. For authorized delivery, verify the successful owned commit and its validated tree before pushing. A failed stage or commit stops dependent push, PR and CI actions. Match each completion claim to direct evidence for the requested artifact, and report unavailable or excluded evidence as a limit.
Deliver only the requested scope. Follow unslop and report changed behavior/artifacts, actual evidence, unresolved limits and local/committed/pushed/merged/deployed state. Start a PR, merge, publish, deployment, external message or monitor only under explicit authority; delegation and playbooks grant none.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

