agentleFS
orbyn-devorbyn-dev/orbyn-fullstack-skills/skills/orbyn-content-design/SKILL.md

orbyn-content-design

Skill4 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Write and arrange concise product content, labels, status, errors and help across web, desktop and mobile. Use for visible interface copy and content hierarchy; preserve user-authored documents and messages.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Start with the person's task.

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    Add a helper only when it resolves ambiguity or prevents an error.

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep recipient, sharing scope, cost/fallback choices, approval and destructive consequences visible where the decision happens.

    line 27
  4. Distinctive:

    Use sentence case, familiar terms and concrete verbs.

    line 39
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not rewrite or delete a person's document, task title, provider name or message to meet UI copy targets.

    line 67
  6. Distinctive:

    Use badges or a compact metadata line for provider kind and state instead of embedding every detail in the title.

    line 73
  7. Distinctive:

    Before handoff, remove repetition and read only the visible headings, values and actions: the task should still make sense.

    line 91
  8. Distinctive:

    If independent visual review is requested, give the assigned inspector specific content risks in the stable-candidate batch.

    line 96

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Orbyn Content Design

Make the next action understandable at a glance. Routine application screens must not read like product documentation or a generated essay. Use the consuming product's vocabulary and brand; Orbyn examples illustrate the method and are not required product features. Use with the layout skill at skills/orbyn-ui-design/SKILL.md; follow the agreed task scope and AGENTS.md.

This skill owns in-product language. For LinkedIn/social announcements and personal posts, use social-content, with social-preview for graphics and feed mockups. Marketing drafts do not change app copy.

Decide what belongs on screen

  • Start with the person's task. Show its name, useful current value/state and relevant action. Delete copy that repeats the heading, describes an obvious control or advertises benefits during the task.
  • Add a helper only when it resolves ambiguity or prevents an error. Prefer one short sentence. Put optional mechanisms, examples and troubleshooting details behind specifically named help, such as “How search works”.
  • Keep recipient, sharing scope, cost/fallback choices, approval and destructive consequences visible where the decision happens. Concision cannot conceal a material consequence or turn uncertain usage into a verified amount.
  • Separate information by purpose: identity/title, status/value, action, optional detail. Avoid several equal-weight paragraphs or a card inside another card just to explain a single setting.
  • Routine Settings/Admin/task surfaces need no welcome essay, motivational quote, feature list or marketing footer. Public landing pages can tell the product story, in deliberate sections instead of repeated benefit prose.

Write concise, specific copy

Use sentence case, familiar terms and concrete verbs. As local starting targets, aim for labels of 1–4 words, headings of 2–6 words and helpers around 12–18 words. These are editing prompts, not hard limits: clarity and consequences take priority. Check the actual narrow layout and translations instead of enforcing word counts with tests or clipping text.

  • Buttons name the outcome: “Add provider”, “Connect account”, “Retry”. Context must identify the target when several actions exist; icon-only actions need accessible names. Keep vocabulary consistent across clients.
  • Status gives the fact: “Off”, “Connected”, “Loading models…”, “Waiting for you”. Show each progress sentence in one visible place. Keep needed live-region announcements accessible without creating duplicate visual copy.
  • Errors give the problem and a useful next step near the initiating action. For example: “Couldn't load models. Try again.” Preserve drafts. Put request IDs and technical diagnostics in a revealable detail, not the headline.
  • Empty states give a short fact and one useful action: “No providers yet” with “Add provider”. Avoid generic promises such as “Give your ideas a home”.
  • Preserve distinctions that affect the user's destination or authority. In Orbyn, for example, inference providers differ from MCP/Connected agents and interactive chat differs from Background and Overnight. Other products use their own concepts; do not impose those features or names.

For whole-phrase localization, plural/interpolation/fallback, mixed-direction technical text and live native labels, use the UI owner’s localization and RTL contract.

Present real content and long values

  • Do not rewrite or delete a person's document, task title, provider name or message to meet UI copy targets. Keep the full value available through wrapping, expansion or its detail view; never rely on hover alone on touch devices.
  • Essential values such as selected model, recipient and quota must remain identifiable. A shortened display needs an accessible route to the full value and must not make two choices indistinguishable.
  • Use badges or a compact metadata line for provider kind and state instead of embedding every detail in the title. Avoid repeated labels when context already names the field. Never show secret/token fragments as decorative metadata.
  • On narrow screens, prioritize the task over explanatory text and repeated branding. Reflow controls and use existing text roles; do not shrink fonts, disable text scaling or clip content to disguise excess copy.

Outcomes, attention and control labels

For agent results, daily briefs, routine notifications or execution controls, use factual outcomes and attention. Separate goal evidence from run termination; preserve partial/failed/waiting/interrupted and unknown outcomes, grouped review and distinct pause/stop/revoke/mute effects. The synthetic routine review makes the method concrete. This changes presentation guidance, not authority or the backend status owner.

Review within the existing visual batch

Before handoff, remove repetition and read only the visible headings, values and actions: the task should still make sense. Check that optional help is discoverable and essential information stays visible. Evaluate scanability and task space, not just whether all boxes fit. Preserve the full agreed acceptance requirements.

If independent visual review is requested, give the assigned inspector specific content risks in the stable-candidate batch; do not start another screenshot sweep solely because this skill or documentation changed.

For an agreed full redesign, QA fixture names or the sources behind these targets, read conditional review.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.