agentleFS
nschurmannnschurmann/hola-ai/skills/backlog/SKILL.md

backlog

Skill101 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub

Turns a software idea or a discussed feature into a backlog of short, vertical user stories. No acceptance criteria or implementation; that's /story's job.

36 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use issue, worktree and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • AWSSkill

    issue

    Implement a GitHub issue end-to-end — branch, code, test, docs, and commit.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    worktree

    Create, reuse or clean up a dedicated git worktree for working on a pull request or a private branch. Use from any PR-scoped workflow that needs an isolated checkout to keep current code and build output untouched.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    retro

    Conduct a retrospective on a coding session.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • HashiCorpSkill

    changelog

    Add a `.changelog/<PR_NUMBER>.txt` entry for a GitHub Pull Request, commit, and push.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • BlockSkill

    plan

    Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • VercelSkill

    deploy

    Deploy applications to Vercel. Use when the user says "deploy", "deploy to Vercel", "push to production", "deploy my app", or "go live".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Other versions36 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 36

    1. sammcj/agentic-coding★ 169same name
    2. a-lottes/aSPARK★ 25same name
    3. camtrik/agent-trail★ 15same name
    4. ovargas/virtual-team★ 14same name
    5. greglas75/zuvo★ 7same name
    6. gonimar/claude-web-studio★ 4same name
    7. maxekman/skills★ 4same name
    8. cirne/agent-skills★ 3same name
    9. newkayak12/claude-skills★ 3same name
    10. beeltec/skills★ 2same name

    26 more not listed

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 35 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If it's a new project, let's discuss the stack.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Ask whether any of these expensive-to-change decisions apply.

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    Don't invent requirements: Only split what I told you.

    line 24
  4. Distinctive:

    One line per story: No acceptance criteria, no technical details, no estimates or priorities.

    line 28
  5. Very specific:

    Add Requires: #N only when a story makes no sense without another.

    line 44
  6. Distinctive:

    When done, offer to save the context and stack in CLAUDE.md (or AGENTS.md).

    line 46

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 35 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Backlog

Your job is to help me split what I tell you into user stories. I bring the requirements; you order and slice them.

Conversation

  1. Listen to the idea or feature. If something is unclear, ask. One question at a time, with your suggested answer.
  2. If it's a new project, let's discuss the stack. Only the stack, not the architecture or implementation.
  3. Ask whether any of these expensive-to-change decisions apply. Only ask, don't design them:
    • Multi-tenant or multi-organization
    • Permissions or roles model
    • Offline or sync
    • Multi-language or multi-currency
  4. Propose the backlog. I adjust it.

Rules

  • Don't invent requirements. Only split what I told you. If you see a gap, ask me; don't fill it.
  • Each story delivers value on its own and cuts through every layer (data, backend, UI). Never split by layer.
  • No technical stories. The actor is never the developer or the system. "Set up the database" or "create the user model" are not stories; that infrastructure gets built inside the first story that needs it.
  • Few stories. 10–15 max. I'd rather add than cut.
  • One line per story. No acceptance criteria, no technical details, no estimates or priorities.
  • The first story is the smallest one usable end to end (walking skeleton).

Output format

## Context
<one or two lines: what it is and who it's for>
Stack: <what we agreed>
Expensive decisions: <the ones that apply, or "none">

## Backlog
1. As a <actor>, I want <action>, so that <benefit>.
2. As a <actor>, I want <action>, so that <benefit>. Requires: #1

Add Requires: #N only when a story makes no sense without another.

When done, offer to save the context and stack in CLAUDE.md (or AGENTS.md). The stories go to my tracker; don't save them to files unless I ask.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.