agentleFS
notquenotque/vexjoy-agent/skills/process/workflow/SKILL.md

workflow

Skill448 starsChanged 4 days agoMITView on GitHub

Structured work: multi-phase tasks, feature builds, planning, objective loops, hill climbing.

71 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use build-keil, can-debug and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ZhongYechengSkill

    build-keil

    当需要通过 Keil MDK 命令行编译嵌入式工程,调用自带脚本解析工程文件、执行构建并定位固件产物时使用。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ZhongYechengSkill

    can-debug

    当需要调试 CAN 总线通信时使用,支持通过 USB-CAN 适配器监听、发送 CAN 帧和扫描节点。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • iPlug2Skill

    build-cmake

    Build an iPlug2 plugin project using CMake with Ninja, Xcode, or Visual Studio generators

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +9 more from ZhongYecheng

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 54 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If .feature/ exists, check state: python3 ~/.claude/scripts/feature-state.py status.

    line 77
  2. Distinctive:

    If no feature state exists, determine entry from intent:

    line 80
  3. Distinctive:

    Never manipulate state files directly.

    line 104
  4. Very specific:

    Write .objective/<slug>/state.md from references/ol-state-file.md.

    line 154
  5. Distinctive:

    Run every done-criterion check.

    line 165
  6. Distinctive:

    All pass -> final report, STOP.

    line 171
  7. Very specific:

    All pass: stop. Unmet + iterations remain: update state file, call ScheduleWakeup (delay 270s for active polling, 1200s+ for idle work).

    line 179
  8. Distinctive:

    Run MEASURE N times (N >= 5, N >= 10 for wall-clock).

    line 210
  9. Distinctive:

    If spread >= target improvement: STOP -- harness too noisy.

    line 211
  10. Very specific:

    Run MEASURE N times. Compare median to baseline.

    line 226
  11. Very specific:

    Ask first: does this need a multi-agent workflow?

    line 243

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 54 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Workflow Skill

Five modes for structured multi-phase work. Match the request, follow that mode's instructions.

Mode Selection

Request patternMode
Feature design/plan/implement/validate/release, end-to-endFeature Lifecycle
Write spec, define requirements, create plan, interview, pause/resumePlanning
Keep working until, iterate until done, drive to doneObjective Loop
Make faster, speed up, reduce latency, profile, hill climbHill Climb
All other structured workflows: review, debug, refactor, research, create, explore, upgradeAd-Hoc Workflow

Feature Lifecycle

Phase-gated workflow: DESIGN > PLAN > IMPLEMENT > VALIDATE > RELEASE. Each phase must pass its gate before the next begins.

Phase Routing

If .feature/ exists, check state: python3 ~/.claude/scripts/feature-state.py status. Route to the indicated phase.

If no feature state exists, determine entry from intent:

  • "design", "think through", "explore approaches" -> DESIGN
  • "plan", "break down", "create tasks" -> PLAN (requires completed design)
  • "implement", "execute plan" -> IMPLEMENT (requires completed plan)
  • "validate", "quality gates" -> VALIDATE (requires completed implementation)
  • "release", "merge", "ship it" -> RELEASE (requires passed validation)
  • "end to end", "full lifecycle" -> DESIGN (start from beginning)

Phase References

Load the phase reference, then follow it exactly:

PhaseReferenceProduces
DESIGNreferences/fl-design.mddesign.md
PLANreferences/fl-plan.mdWave-ordered task list
IMPLEMENTreferences/fl-implement.mdCode changes
VALIDATEreferences/fl-validate.mdQuality gate report
RELEASEreferences/fl-release.mdMerged PR
End-to-endreferences/fl-pipeline.mdFull lifecycle
State conventionsreferences/fl-shared.md--
Error recoveryreferences/fl-error-handling.md--

State operations use python3 ~/.claude/scripts/feature-state.py only. Never manipulate state files directly.


Planning

Spec writing, plan creation, interviews, ambiguity triage, and session pause/resume. Planning owns specs and saved plans; execution goes through the process skill's Subagent mode or workflow dispatch.

Sub-mode Routing

SignalReference
Write spec, user stories, define requirements, scope, acceptance criteriareferences/pl-spec.md
Discuss ambiguities, resolve gray areas, pre-planning discussionreferences/pl-pre-plan.md
Interview me, depth-first review, "not sure", "where do I start", "poke holes"references/pl-depth-first-interview.md
Implicit ambiguity or unclear implementation choicesreferences/pl-ambiguity-triage.md
Another person holds needed facts or approvalreferences/pl-human-source-elicitation.md
Observation can settle a disputed choicereferences/pl-empirical-prototype.md
Phase or session transition nearreferences/pl-context-boundary.md
Create plan, task plan, file-backed planningreferences/pl-plan-files.md
Check plan, validate plan, pre-execution checkreferences/pl-check.md
List plans, show plan, complete plan, manage plansreferences/pl-manage.md
Pause, save progress, handoff, stopping for nowreferences/pl-pause.md
Resume, continue, pick up where I left offreferences/pl-resume.md

For interviews, batch independent questions into frontier rounds. Ask dependent questions sequentially. Include a recommendation per question.


Objective Loop

Iterate-until-verified-done loop. A user states an objective with verifiable done-criteria; each iteration routes one /do cycle, verifies by executing the criteria, and reschedules until verified-done or budget-stop.

Phase 1: SPEC

Gather from the request: objective statement, DONE-CRITERIA (verifiable checks), iteration budget (default 5), NOT-DONE-YET guardrails (what may never be done to satisfy a criterion).

DONE-CRITERIA types: command (preferred -- deterministic command with expected exit code/output) or rubric (only when no mechanical check exists -- frozen at SPEC time, graded by a fresh-context agent).

Phase 2: STATE

Write .objective/<slug>/state.md from references/ol-state-file.md. Wakeups resume from the state file, never conversation memory.

Phase 3: ITERATE

Plan the smallest next step. Route through /do: classify -> route -> dispatch agents -> evaluate. The loop dispatches exclusively through /do -- never edit inline.

Phase 4: VERIFY

Run every done-criterion check. A worker's "passes" claim never substitutes for re-running.

  • command: run it, paste exit code and output into iteration log.
  • rubric: dispatch fresh-context sub-agent (did NOT produce the work) with artifact + rubric only. Returns PASS/FAIL with cited evidence.

All pass -> final report, STOP. Any unmet -> Phase 5.

Criteria-gaming guard: a criterion may never be satisfied by weakening a hook, gate, test, or safety control. Stop and report the conflict if that is the only visible path.

Phase 5: RESCHEDULE or STOP

All pass: stop. Unmet + iterations remain: update state file, call ScheduleWakeup (delay 270s for active polling, 1200s+ for idle work). Budget exhausted: honest NOT-DONE report with per-criterion status.


Hill Climb

Metric-driven optimization loop. One number moves; everything else stays fixed. Each iteration: hypothesis -> one change -> correctness floor -> re-measure -> accept or revert.

Phase 1: SPEC

FieldRequiredDefault
METRIC (one number, units, direction)yes--
MEASURE (deterministic command)yes--
TARGET (value that ends the loop)yes--
FLOOR (correctness gate commands, must exit 0)yes--
FIXTURE (pinned dataset/workload)yes--
Variance toleranceno2x baseline spread
Iteration budgetno8
Plateau threshold Kno3

One METRIC per loop. Two numbers with a trade-off: promote one to the FLOOR. Load references/hc-domain-playbooks.md for pre-filled SPEC blocks per domain (frame rate, API latency, CI time, bundle size, memory, token cost).

Phase 2: BASELINE

Run MEASURE N times (N >= 5, N >= 10 for wall-clock). Record median and spread. If spread >= target improvement: STOP -- harness too noisy. Report noise sources and offer to stabilize first.

Phase 3: PROFILE

Locate the cost before changing anything. Load references/hc-profiling-tools.md for per-domain tooling. Guessing at hot spots is the dominant failure mode.

Phase 4: HYPOTHESIZE and CHANGE

State one hypothesis targeting the profiled hot spot. Make one change. Run FLOOR commands -- revert immediately if any fail.

Phase 5: MEASURE

Run MEASURE N times. Compare median to baseline. Accept only if delta > variance tolerance. Update ledger (references/hc-ledger.md). If accepted, new baseline.

Phase 6: LOOP or STOP

Target reached: final report. K consecutive non-improving iterations: plateau stop. Budget exhausted: report what worked and what remains.


Ad-Hoc Workflow

For structured multi-phase work that does not fit the four modes above. Identify the workflow from the table, load its reference, follow its phases exactly.

Cost Gate

Ask first: does this need a multi-agent workflow? Skip the workflow when: single-file mechanical edit (use quick), one agent satisfies the request (direct dispatch), lookup/status/count (direct agent). Escalate only when the request has independent subtasks, needs orthogonal verification, or names "comprehensive / thorough / adversarial / tournament."

Composable Patterns

PatternWhat it does
Classify-and-actRoute by type up front; or classify-at-end
Fan-out-and-synthesizeIndependent agents in parallel, barrier, one synthesizer
Adversarial verificationExecutor builds, fresh skeptic refutes
Generate-and-filterOver-generate candidates, gate keeps survivors
TournamentN agents attempt same task; pairwise judges pick winner per round
Loop-until-doneRepeat until hard completion test passes
QuarantineRead-only triage agent for untrusted content; separate privileged acting agent

Workflow Catalog

Load the reference for the matched workflow. references/... paths resolve under ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}.

CategoryWorkflowReference
Code ReviewComprehensive multi-wavereferences/comprehensive-review.md
DebuggingEvidence-based diagnosisreferences/systematic-debugging.md
RefactoringSafe refactoring with test gatesreferences/systematic-refactoring.md
ResearchFormal research with source gatesreferences/research-pipeline.md
ResearchResearch to articlereferences/research-to-article.md
ContentArticle evaluationreferences/article-evaluation-pipeline.md
ContentDe-AI contentreferences/de-ai-pipeline.md
ContentDocumentationreferences/doc-pipeline.md
ExplorationCodebase explorationreferences/explore-pipeline.md
ExplorationMulti-perspective analysisreferences/do-perspectives.md
CreationSkill creationreferences/skill-creation-pipeline.md
CreationHook developmentreferences/hook-development-pipeline.md
CreationMCP serverreferences/mcp-pipeline-builder.md
CreationPipeline scaffoldingreferences/pipeline-scaffolder.md
CreationDomain researchreferences/domain-research.md
CreationChain compositionreferences/chain-composer.md
CreationAuto-pipeline generationreferences/auto-pipeline.md
UpgradeAgent/skill upgradereferences/agent-upgrade.md
UpgradeSystem upgradereferences/system-upgrade.md
UpgradeToolkit improvementreferences/toolkit-improvement.md
TestingPipeline test runnerreferences/pipeline-test-runner.md
TestingPipeline retroreferences/pipeline-retro.md
GitHubProfile rules extractionreferences/github-profile-rules.md
GitHubFix PRs in repos you don't ownreferences/pr-fix-loop.md
OrchestrationTask orchestrationreferences/workflow-orchestrator.md
OrchestrationDAG compositionreferences/dag-composition-patterns.md
OrchestrationCompatibility matrixreferences/dag-compatibility-matrix.md
OrchestrationCommon DAG patternsreferences/dag-skill-patterns.md
OrchestrationDAG examplesreferences/dag-orchestration-examples.md
OrchestrationDAG advancedreferences/dag-orchestration-advanced.md
OrchestrationFeedback loopreferences/feedback-loop-construction.md

Terminology

"Workflow" is the canonical term. "Pipeline" is the retained legacy alias -- kept for back-compat in routing keys, meta.name exports, and pipeline-index.json. Use "workflow" in new prose; do not rename code identifiers.


Error Handling

ErrorResponse
Mode ambiguousAsk the user to clarify intent
Phase mismatchReport current state, suggest correct next phase
Missing artifactRoute back to previous phase
Noisy harness (hill-climb)Stop; report spread vs target improvement
Budget exhaustedHonest NOT-DONE report with per-criterion status
State file missing on wakeupReport and stop; ask user to restate objective

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.