cve-source-check
Skill448 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub
Audit CVE/vulnerability source coverage for a technology stack. Maps each component (container, library, base image, runtime) to authoritative CVE feeds, flags gaps, and produces audit-ready reports. Generic: works for any service or stack.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- notque/claude-code-toolkitedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- notque/claude-code-toolkit★ 44899% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository64 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- assessmentSkill
- dataSkill
- business-opsSkill
- code-qualitySkill
- comment-qualitySkill
- condenseSkill
- joy-checkSkill
- content-engineSkill
- contentSkill
- headlinesSkill
- image-genSkill
- image-to-videoSkill
- series-plannerSkill
- topic-brainstormerSkill
- video-editingSkill
- writingSkill
- domainSkill
- cli-designSkill
- frontendSkill
- frontend-slidesSkill
- jev-designSkill
- webgl-card-effectsSkill
- game-asset-generatorSkill
- game-devSkill
- game-trailerSkill
- motion-pipelineSkill
- browser-jev-automationSkill
- deploySkill
- endpoint-validatorSkill
- headless-cron-creatorSkill
- kubernetesSkill
- githubSkill
- accountsSkill
- auto-dreamSkill
- building-with-jevSkill
- codexSkill
- docs-sync-checkerSkill
- doSkill
- dSkill
- grill-jevSkill
- toolkitSkill
- workflow-helpSkill
- debuggingSkill
- plant-seedSkill
- processSkill
- pr-workflowSkill
- quickSkill
- testingSkill
- with-anti-rationalizationSkill
- workflowSkill
- worktree-agentSkill
- programmingSkill
- architecture-deepeningSkill
- codebase-analyzerSkill
- markdown-converterSkill
- news-collectionSkill
- researchSkill
- roastSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 84
If --current-sources provided, read URLs and normalize for case-insensitive comparison.
- Very specific: line 90
Look up each component name (and aliases) in the registry.
- Very specific: line 92
If current sources loaded, mark each source monitored: true when its normalized URL appears.
- Very specific: line 93
If --check-urls: HEAD-check each unique URL.
- Very specific: line 95
Gate: every component has status.
- Very specific: line 100
Write JSON report with per-component status and per-source monitored/reachable fields.
- Distinctive: line 101
Write Markdown report: summary table, components table (markers), gaps section (when gaps exist), unmapped section (when unmapped exist).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CVE Source Check
Audit CVE/vulnerability source coverage for a technology stack. Maps components to authoritative CVE feeds via a versioned registry, flags gaps, and produces audit-ready reports (JSON + Markdown).
In scope: component-to-feed mapping, coverage/gap reporting, optional URL reachability checks. Out of scope: running scanners (Trivy/Snyk), fetching CVE content, private vuln databases.
Quick Start
# Inline, offline
python3 scripts/check-cve-sources.py \
--inline "go@1.22,alpine@3.19,postgres@16,redis@7,nginx@1.25" \
--service my-service
# Inventory + monitored feeds + link verification
python3 scripts/check-cve-sources.py \
--inventory examples/inventory.example.json \
--current-sources examples/current-sources.example.txt \
--service my-service --check-urlsInputs
| Flag | Purpose |
--inventory <file> | JSON: [{name, version?, type?}, ...] or {components: [...]}. |
--inline "name@ver,..." | Comma-separated list. Mutually exclusive with --inventory. |
--current-sources <file> | One URL per line. # comments and blank lines skipped. |
--service <name> | Name for report header and filenames. |
--check-urls | HEAD-check every source URL (5s timeout, graceful degradation). |
--registry <path> | Override default tech-source-registry.json. |
--out-dir <path> | Output directory (default: cwd). |
JSON only. YAML not supported (no stdlib parser).
Outputs
Files: cve-source-report-{service}-{YYYYMMDD}.{md,json} in --out-dir.
| Exit | Meaning |
| 0 | Full coverage. |
| 1 | Gaps (unmapped components or unmonitored sources). |
| 2 | Unreachable source URL (only with --check-urls). |
| 3 | Input error (missing/malformed registry or inventory). |
Workflow
Phase 1: LOAD
- Locate
tech-source-registry.json(next to SKILL.md by default, or--registry). - Build inventory from
--inventory(JSON list or{components: [...]}) or--inline(comma-splitname@version). - If
--current-sourcesprovided, read URLs and normalize for case-insensitive comparison.
Gate: at least one component present. Empty inventory -> exit 3.
Phase 2: MAP & VERIFY
- Look up each component
name(and aliases) in the registry.- Found ->
mapped, attach source list. Missing ->unmapped, sources[].
- Found ->
- If current sources loaded, mark each source
monitored: truewhen its normalized URL appears. - If
--check-urls: HEAD-check each unique URL. Treat 200/301/302/403/405 as reachable. 4xx (except 403/405) and 5xx ->reachable: false. Timeout/DNS/TLS failure ->reachable: null(WARN, does not affect exit code). 5s timeout per URL, cached per run.
Gate: every component has status; every source has monitored and reachable fields.
Phase 3: REPORT
- Compute summary: components, mapped/unmapped, monitored, coverage %, gaps, unreachable.
- Write JSON report with per-component status and per-source
monitored/reachablefields. - Write Markdown report: summary table, components table (markers), gaps section (when gaps exist), unmapped section (when unmapped exist).
- Print one-screen summary to stdout. Set exit code per table above.
Gate: both files written, summary printed.
Registry Schema
tech-source-registry.json shape:
{
"$schema_version": "1.0",
"kinds": ["advisory-list", "github-security", "mailing-list", "distro-tracker", "vendor-page", "mitre"],
"priorities": ["primary", "secondary"],
"technologies": [
{"name": "postgres", "aliases": ["postgresql","pg"], "type": "container",
"sources": [{"url": "https://...", "kind": "advisory-list", "priority": "primary"}]}
]
}Each technology: name (lowercase, unique), aliases (list), type (runtime/base-image/container/library), sources (1-3, at least one primary).
To add a technology: pick canonical name, list aliases, add 1-3 sources (lead with vendor advisory page), re-run against a sample inventory.
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Fix |
| Failed to load registry | Missing or malformed JSON | Validate with python3 -m json.tool |
| Failed to load inventory | Missing, malformed, or wrong shape | Validate JSON; must be list or {components: [...]} |
| Inventory empty | No usable components | Each entry needs name. Inline needs non-empty tokens. |
| Coverage stuck at 0% | --current-sources URLs don't match registry | Copy URLs from registry. Scheme/host case and trailing slash are normalized; rest must match. |
Many [--] entries with --check-urls | Network issues | Re-run without --check-urls. Network errors don't affect gap exit code. |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

