github
Skill448 starsChanged 4 days agoMITView on GitHub
GitHub: notification triage, profile rule extraction.
166 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Moriarty33/jb-kaizentheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- GradScalerTeam/claude_clitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- artivilla/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DmacMcgreg/psibottheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ashleysbrain/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sidmanale643/pekka-bottheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use taskflow-inbox-triage, BlueBubbles and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AtomicBot-aiSkilltaskflow-inbox-triage
Also in 6 projects that use this
jiulingyunSkillBlueBubbles
为Clawdbot构建或更新BlueBubbles外部通道插件(扩展包,REST发送/探测,webhook入站)。
Also in 20 projects that use this
hkyutongSkillnode-connect
Diagnose OpenClaw node connection and pairing failures for Android, iOS, and macOS companion apps. Use when QR/setup code/manual connect fails, local Wi-Fi works but VPS/tailnet does not, or errors mention pairing required, unauthorized, bootstrap token invalid or expired, gateway.bind, gateway.remote.url, Tailscale, or plugins.entries.device-pair.config.publicUrl.
Also in 18 projects that use this
molt-botSkilldiscord-e2e
Test Discord with Convex-leased QA bots: check credentials without a Gateway, exercise owned messages, or prove OpenClaw replies, files, threads, reactions, streaming, and typing. Distinguish API and Gateway evidence from manual user interactions.
Also in 10 projects that use this
molt-botSkillopenclaw-repair-sweep
Run scoped OpenClaw issue/PR repair campaigns: coordinate workers, prove root causes, and land or close verified work under the requested authority.
Also in 10 projects that use this
clawdbotSkillopenclaw-performance
Performance work in OpenClaw: a slow or heavy flow (latency, CPU, memory, SQL, RPC, renders), writing or reviewing a perf PR, or adding a cache. Count the work, delete waste first, cache last.
Also in 7 projects that use this
- +2 more from molt-bot
Other versions166 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- notque/claude-code-toolkit★ 448100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 165
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- steipete/warelay★ 394ksame name
- steipete/clawdis★ 394ksame name
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394ksame name
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394ksame name
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391ksame name
- NousResearch/hermes-agent★ 262ksame name
- spinabot/brigade★ 11ksame name
- the-open-agent/openagent★ 5.7ksame name
155 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository64 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- assessmentSkill
- dataSkill
- business-opsSkill
- code-qualitySkill
- comment-qualitySkill
- condenseSkill
- joy-checkSkill
- content-engineSkill
- contentSkill
- headlinesSkill
- image-genSkill
- image-to-videoSkill
- series-plannerSkill
- topic-brainstormerSkill
- video-editingSkill
- writingSkill
- domainSkill
- cli-designSkill
- frontendSkill
- frontend-slidesSkill
- jev-designSkill
- webgl-card-effectsSkill
- game-asset-generatorSkill
- game-devSkill
- game-trailerSkill
- motion-pipelineSkill
- browser-jev-automationSkill
- cve-source-checkSkill
- deploySkill
- endpoint-validatorSkill
- headless-cron-creatorSkill
- kubernetesSkill
- accountsSkill
- auto-dreamSkill
- building-with-jevSkill
- codexSkill
- docs-sync-checkerSkill
- doSkill
- dSkill
- grill-jevSkill
- toolkitSkill
- workflow-helpSkill
- debuggingSkill
- plant-seedSkill
- processSkill
- pr-workflowSkill
- quickSkill
- testingSkill
- with-anti-rationalizationSkill
- workflowSkill
- worktree-agentSkill
- programmingSkill
- architecture-deepeningSkill
- codebase-analyzerSkill
- markdown-converterSkill
- news-collectionSkill
- researchSkill
- roastSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 150 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 67
If the user says "clean them up", "mark read", "clear the noise", or "yes" to clearing informational items, re-run with --mark-read.
- Distinctive: line 79
When triaging a queue of issues or PRs (not just notifications), produce one card per item.
- Distinctive: line 120
When in doubt, label Needs-owner and state the decision the owner must make.
- Distinctive: line 124
Before any local work on an item (checkout, tests, repro):
- Very specific: line 128
If dirty, mark the card Needs-owner with blocker "dirty working tree in <repo>" and continue triaging from API data only.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 150 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
GitHub Skill
GitHub notification triage and issue/PR queue classification.
Mode Selection
| Request | Mode |
| Notifications, inbox, cleanup | Notification Triage |
| Issue or PR queue, review items | Queue Triage |
Notification Triage
Fetch, classify, and report GitHub notifications via the triage script.
Commands
# Report-only (default)
python3 scripts/github-notification-triage.py
# Mark informational notifications as read
python3 scripts/github-notification-triage.py --mark-read
# Save report to ~/.claude/reports/notifications/
python3 scripts/github-notification-triage.py --save
# Cron/scheduled: auto-clear noise and save
python3 scripts/github-notification-triage.py --mark-read --saveSteps
- Run report-only:
python3 scripts/github-notification-triage.py. - Display the output. The report classifies notifications as:
- Action required -- PRs awaiting review, mentions, assigned issues.
- Informational -- CI results, bot comments, automated updates.
- If the user says "clean them up", "mark read", "clear the noise", or "yes"
to clearing informational items, re-run with
--mark-read. Confirm how many were marked read.
Scheduled (no interactive user): run with --mark-read --save.
Exit codes: 0 = success, 1 = error (auth, API, script not found).
Queue Triage
When triaging a queue of issues or PRs (not just notifications), produce one card per item.
Card Format
Open each card with the item's full GitHub URL on its own line, then these fields in order:
| Field | Content |
| What | One sentence: what the issue/PR asks or changes. |
| Why | Motivation or problem it addresses. |
| Author trust | Maintainer, known contributor, first-timer, or bot. Cite prior merged PRs. |
| Fit | Match to project scope and conventions. |
| Risk | Blast radius: files touched, API/behavior changes, security or data paths. |
| Proof state | CI status, tests added, repro steps, screenshots. "Unverified" when none. |
| Blocker | Single thing stopping progress, or "None". |
| Next action | One concrete step with named actor. Label Autonomous or Needs-owner. |
Example:
https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123
What: Adds retry with backoff to the webhook sender.
Why: Webhooks drop on transient 5xx from receivers.
Author trust: Known contributor, 4 merged PRs.
Fit: Matches existing client retry pattern in net/client.go.
Risk: Low — one module, behavior gated behind config flag.
Proof state: CI green; unit tests cover backoff schedule.
Blocker: None.
Next action: Autonomous — review and merge.Autonomous vs Needs-owner
- Autonomous -- the agent can complete the action alone: reply with a question, label, close an obvious duplicate, merge a green PR within granted authority, rebase.
- Needs-owner -- requires owner judgment: scope decisions, breaking changes, security-sensitive merges, releases, money, or access.
When in doubt, label Needs-owner and state the decision the owner must make.
Clean-Checkout Gate
Before any local work on an item (checkout, tests, repro):
- Run
git status --short. - Proceed only when output is empty.
- If dirty, mark the card Needs-owner with blocker "dirty working tree in
<repo>" and continue triaging from API data only.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

