observability-engineering
Skill11 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Observability, telemetry, and production diagnostics guidance. Use when designing, adding, reviewing, or testing structured logs, metrics, traces, span/context propagation, correlation or request IDs, sampling, labels/cardinality, dashboards, alerts, SLO/SLI/error-budget signals, OpenTelemetry/Prometheus/Grafana/Datadog-style instrumentation, operational runbooks, or incident visibility. Do not use for ordinary language implementation, active debugging without durable instrumentation changes, security review except telemetry leakage or audit controls, BDD/TDD mechanics, or documentation-only edits; load those existing skills instead or alongside this skill when their trigger is primary.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- rogue-dev-studio/ai-agents-roguetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- anandartin/celestial-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- JPeetz/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- weirdgme/Claude-code-infrastructure-showcasetheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2025
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- JPeetz/agent-skills★ 14same name
- weirdgme/Claude-code-infrastructure-showcase★ 4same name
- rogue-dev-studio/ai-agents-rogue★ 2same name
- anandartin/celestial-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository70 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adversarial-reviewSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- behavior-driven-developmentSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- ci-release-engineeringSkill
- clean-architectureSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- container-engineeringSkill
- create-agent-skillSkill
- csharp-dotnet-engineeringSkill
- css-scss-stylingSkill
- data-platform-engineeringSkill
- dependency-supply-chain-reviewSkill
- digital-asset-managementSkill
- documentation-engineeringSkill
- domain-driven-designSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- donsetch-web-researchSkill
- gherkinSkill
- git-commitSkill
- git-workflowsSkill
- hexagonal-architectureSkill
- impeccableSkill
- internationalization-localizationSkill
- javascript-typescript-engineeringSkill
- justfilesSkill
- mcp-server-engineeringSkill
- mysql-mariadb-sql-engineeringSkill
- onion-architectureSkill
- parallelism-engineeringSkill
- performance-reviewSkill
- playwright-e2eSkill
- postgresql-sql-engineeringSkill
- prompt-engineering-reviewSkill
- python-antipatternsSkill
- python-design-patternsSkill
- python-engineeringSkill
- random-data-identifiersSkill
- release-readinessSkill
- review-verification-protocolSkill
- root-cause-analysisSkill
- ruby-engineeringSkill
- rust-antipatternsSkill
- rust-async-webSkill
- rust-code-reviewSkill
- rust-design-patternsSkill
- rust-desktop-guiSkill
- rust-engineeringSkill
- rust-persistence-sqlSkill
- rust-testing-qualitySkill
- script-engineeringSkill
- security-review-evidenceSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- semantic-versioningSkill
- sql-engineeringSkill
- sqlite-sql-engineeringSkill
- suggest-lucide-iconsSkill
- svelte-sveltekit-engineeringSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
23 rules. 0 are common, 22 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
22
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Use this skill to make production behavior visible enough for operators to detect, diagnose, and prevent failures without leaking data or …
- Distinctive: line 24
Use language, framework, SQL, architecture, debugging, testing, or documentation skills for their primary mechanics.
- Distinctive: line 40
Do not use this skill as the primary workflow for:
- Distinctive: line 65
Never print raw secrets or sensitive telemetry to prove redaction.
- Distinctive: line 72
Keep ordinary telemetry operational by default.
- Distinctive: line 89
Inspect local evidence first: Read existing logging/tracing setup, metrics registries, instrumentation helpers, collectors/processors, …
- Distinctive: line 97
Choose the signal type deliberately: Use logs for discrete events and diagnostic context, metrics for aggregate health and alerting, traces …
- Distinctive: line 114
Connect signals to response: Update or verify dashboards, alert rules, SLO/SLI definitions, burn-rate or threshold logic, ownership, …
- Distinctive: line 117
Validate locally: Add or update tests, fixtures, snapshots, smoke checks, local collectors, generated dashboard/rule validation, or …
- Distinctive: line 129
Follow the repository's existing structured format, field names, severity levels, and logger setup.
- Very specific: line 134
Keep severity actionable: debug for local detail, info for expected lifecycle events, warn for degraded or recovered behavior, and error …
- Distinctive: line 137
Avoid logging secrets, tokens, cookies, raw headers, request bodies, SQL values, credentialed URLs, private paths, unbounded exception …
- Distinctive: line 143
Use counters for monotonic event totals, gauges for point-in-time state, histograms or summaries for latency and size distributions, and …
- Distinctive: line 146
Prefer user-visible health signals: request rate, error rate, duration, saturation, queue depth, dropped work, dependency health, and …
- Distinctive: line 156
Use low-cardinality span names such as operation or route templates, not raw URLs, customer names, IDs, or query text.
- Distinctive: line 158
Put spans around inbound requests, message handling, background jobs, outbound calls, retries, timeouts, queue boundaries, and important …
- Distinctive: line 174
Ensure background jobs, retries, fan-out/fan-in work, and scheduled tasks have a clear correlation story even when no HTTP request exists.
- Distinctive: line 198
Keep labels, tags, attributes, metric names, span names, and event names from growing with users, tenants, files, paths, SQL text, …
- Distinctive: line 210
Prefer repository-owned tests and validation recipes over live vendor checks.
- Distinctive: line 211
Use vendor-specific commands only when they are existing local project commands or examples of local configuration to inspect, and sanitize …
- Distinctive: line 213
Verify representative success, expected failure, timeout/retry, cancellation, and degraded-dependency paths emit the intended signal once …
- Distinctive: line 220
Remove temporary probes before finishing unless they have been converted into documented, bounded, production-quality telemetry.
- Distinctive: line 222
When validation is partial, report the missing signal, why it could not be checked locally, and the operational risk.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Observability Engineering
Use this skill to make production behavior visible enough for operators to detect, diagnose, and prevent failures without leaking data or creating noisy, high-cost telemetry. This skill owns telemetry intent and signal quality: structured logs, metrics, traces, correlation IDs, dashboards, alerts, SLOs, runbooks, sampling, cardinality, retention, and validation.
Use language, framework, SQL, architecture, debugging, testing, or documentation skills for their primary mechanics. Add this skill when the work changes what must be observable, how signals are shaped, or how operators act on them.
Use When
- Designing, adding, reviewing, or testing durable logs, metrics, traces, spans, telemetry events, context propagation, request IDs, correlation IDs, or audit events.
- Defining dashboards, alerts, SLOs, SLIs, error-budget signals, incident visibility, runbook links, or production failure signals.
- Reducing telemetry noise, cost, high-cardinality labels, over-collection, unsafe sampling, or privacy exposure.
- Converting temporary debugging probes into intentional production instrumentation.
Do not use this skill as the primary workflow for:
- Active failures with no durable instrumentation change; use
systematic-debuggingfirst. - Postmortem prevention after the direct cause is known unless the prevention
work is observability; use
root-cause-analysis. - Documentation-only runbooks, dashboard notes, comments, or examples; use
documentation-engineering. - Public API, SDK, CLI, webhook, or message contract semantics; use
api-designfor the exposed contract and add this skill only when telemetry intent or operational signals also change. - Language-specific implementation, Rust async/web behavior, SQL schema/query design, architecture boundary selection, or BDD/TDD method choices unless the task also needs telemetry design.
Security and Privacy Routing
Load security-review and
security-review-evidence when telemetry
can expose secrets, credentials, API keys, tokens, cookies, session IDs, PII,
tenant data, auth/session traces, raw request or response bodies, SQL values,
exploit payloads, credentialed URLs, private host paths, or customer data. Also
load them when logs, alerts, dashboards, traces, or audit events are security
monitoring controls or report evidence.
Never print raw secrets or sensitive telemetry to prove redaction. Capture only sanitized evidence and treat raw logs, traces, profiles, dashboard exports, network dumps, screenshots, incident bundles, and reproduced payloads as local ignored artifacts unless repository policy explicitly allows sanitized retention.
Security, Compliance, And Forensic Audit Events (Conditional)
Keep ordinary telemetry operational by default; do not relabel routine logs as audit events. When a security, compliance, or forensic obligation requires an audit event, load the security skills above and define an explicit event contract:
- Record actor, action, target, outcome, time, and correlation identifiers with stable semantics and appropriate data minimization.
- State whether delivery is complete or has explicit loss semantics. Do not sample when completeness is required; define how duplicates, ordering, and delayed delivery are handled.
- Define access control, integrity/tamper expectations, retention, and deletion rules for the event store and its exports.
- Define failure behavior: fail closed, block, queue durably, degrade with an alert, or record explicit loss, according to the threat model and operational impact.
Workflow
- Inspect local evidence first. Read existing logging/tracing setup, metrics registries, instrumentation helpers, collectors/processors, alert rules, dashboard definitions, SLO docs, runbooks, tests, deployment config, privacy policy, and security guidance. Vendor-specific CLIs or consoles are optional evidence only; prefer repository-owned local files and commands.
- State instrumentation intent. Name the operator question, decision, owner, affected users, failure modes, baseline signal, and action the telemetry must support. Remove or avoid signals that do not answer an operational question.
- Choose the signal type deliberately. Use logs for discrete events and diagnostic context, metrics for aggregate health and alerting, traces for request or job flow across boundaries, and runbooks/dashboards for response.
- Define correlation and context. Decide where request, trace, span, correlation, causation, job, tenant, and user context originate; how they are validated; how they propagate across async tasks, queues, jobs, and outbound calls; and which identifiers must be redacted or omitted.
- Design failure signals. Cover errors, timeouts, retries, cancellations, dependency degradation, queue depth, saturation, partial success, dropped work, backpressure, and data-quality failures at the boundary where operators can act.
- Control cardinality, cost, and volume. Bound labels/tags/attributes, histogram buckets, event payloads, log levels, sampling, retention, and export paths before adding instrumentation.
- Protect privacy and retention. Classify data fields, minimize collection, redact sensitive values at source, avoid raw payload capture, define artifact retention/cleanup, and route security-sensitive evidence as above.
- Connect signals to response. Update or verify dashboards, alert rules, SLO/SLI definitions, burn-rate or threshold logic, ownership, severity, and runbook actions when the instrumentation is meant to page or guide operators.
- Validate locally. Add or update tests, fixtures, snapshots, smoke checks, local collectors, generated dashboard/rule validation, or representative request/job runs that prove the signal is emitted, bounded, correlated, redacted, and actionable.
- Report evidence. Summarize intent, changed signals, validation commands, cost/cardinality controls, privacy handling, skipped checks, and remaining operational risks.
Signal Design Checklist
Structured Logs
- Follow the repository's existing structured format, field names, severity levels, and logger setup. Prefer stable fields over parse-dependent prose.
- Include stable event names, component or route class, request/correlation/trace IDs, sanitized status or error kind, duration where useful, and enough context for diagnosis without raw payloads.
- Keep severity actionable:
debugfor local detail,infofor expected lifecycle events,warnfor degraded or recovered behavior, anderrorfor failed user-visible work, lost jobs, or operator action. - Avoid logging secrets, tokens, cookies, raw headers, request bodies, SQL values, credentialed URLs, private paths, unbounded exception payloads, or high-volume loop details.
Metrics
- Use counters for monotonic event totals, gauges for point-in-time state, histograms or summaries for latency and size distributions, and explicit units in names or metadata.
- Prefer user-visible health signals: request rate, error rate, duration, saturation, queue depth, dropped work, dependency health, and business-critical success/failure counts.
- Bound labels. Avoid raw user IDs, tenant IDs, emails, URLs with IDs, exception messages, SQL text, stack frames, file paths, or request bodies as dimensions.
- Define bucket boundaries, aggregation windows, and reset behavior intentionally; dashboards and alerts should not depend on implementation-private metric churn.
Traces and Spans
- Use low-cardinality span names such as operation or route templates, not raw URLs, customer names, IDs, or query text.
- Put spans around inbound requests, message handling, background jobs, outbound calls, retries, timeouts, queue boundaries, and important domain decisions only when the timing or causal relationship matters.
- Preserve context across async tasks, child jobs, queue messages, and outbound requests. If context is intentionally broken, document the reason and the new correlation path.
- Record sanitized span attributes, events, status, and error categories. Avoid raw payloads and duplicated log content inside spans.
Correlation and Request IDs
- Generate or normalize correlation/request IDs at ingress when absent; validate externally supplied values before echoing them into logs or responses.
- Distinguish request IDs, trace IDs, span IDs, correlation IDs, causation IDs, job IDs, tenant IDs, and user IDs. Do not substitute a sensitive identifier for a public correlation field.
- Ensure background jobs, retries, fan-out/fan-in work, and scheduled tasks have a clear correlation story even when no HTTP request exists.
Dashboards, Alerts, SLOs, and Runbooks
- Dashboards should answer a specific operator question, show current health, expose recent change context where available, and link to the owning service, alert, SLO, and runbook.
- Alerts should trigger on symptoms or user impact, not every internal cause. Specify threshold, window, severity, owner, routing, deduplication, silence expectations, and an actionable first response.
- SLOs need an SLI formula, good/total event definition, measurement window, objective, burn-rate or threshold policy, exclusions, and a response when error budget is consumed.
- Runbooks should include symptoms, impact, likely causes, safe local inspection commands or repository-owned checks, rollback/mitigation paths, escalation, and links to dashboards and alerts. Do not embed credentialed URLs, secrets, or private console-only steps unless sanitized by repository policy.
Cardinality, Sampling, Cost, and Retention
- Estimate the volume impact before adding logs, metrics, spans, profiles, or exemplars on hot paths. Prefer aggregate metrics over high-volume logs for alerting.
- Keep labels, tags, attributes, metric names, span names, and event names from growing with users, tenants, files, paths, SQL text, exception text, payloads, or arbitrary input.
- Make sampling explicit: head/tail sampling choice, rate, per-error overrides, debug escalation, and whether sampled traces still preserve metrics or audit requirements.
- Define retention by artifact class. Raw logs, traces, profiles, screenshots, incident bundles, network captures, and dashboard exports need access controls, cleanup expectations, and sanitized reporting.
Validation Expectations
- Prefer repository-owned tests and validation recipes over live vendor checks. Use vendor-specific commands only when they are existing local project commands or examples of local configuration to inspect, and sanitize outputs.
- Verify representative success, expected failure, timeout/retry, cancellation, and degraded-dependency paths emit the intended signal once and at the right severity.
- Assert redaction for secrets and sensitive fields where practical. Include negative checks for high-cardinality labels and raw payload leakage.
- Validate dashboards, alert definitions, SLO formulas, and runbook links when they are stored as code or generated artifacts.
- Remove temporary probes before finishing unless they have been converted into documented, bounded, production-quality telemetry.
- When validation is partial, report the missing signal, why it could not be checked locally, and the operational risk.
Reporting Template
## Observability Summary
- Instrumentation intent:
- Signals changed:
- Correlation/context behavior:
- Dashboards/alerts/SLOs/runbooks changed:
- Cardinality/cost controls:
- Privacy/redaction/retention handling:
- Validation run:
- Not verified / remaining operational risk:Zod Validation Signals
For selected Zod parsing, load zod-engineering. Separate expected validation rejects from parser faults; allowlist schema class and issue-code aggregates, never raw issues, input, messages, or unbounded paths.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

