agentleFS
nledfordnledford/engineering-review-board/skills/architecture-review/SKILL.md

architecture-review

Skill11 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub

Review architectural boundaries, dependency direction, ports and adapters, Clean/Onion/Hexagonal/DDD hybrids, and modular monolith structure. Use for architecture-focused audits of existing systems or changes; do not use for ordinary implementation or architecture design without a review request.

78 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use create-stories, story-done and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • lilangMaxSkill

    create-stories

    Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    story-done

    End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • +10 more from lilangMax

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 70 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill as an architecture-specific review lens for an existing system, proposal, or diff.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not use it for simple code changes with no boundary impact.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Read project-local guidance, architecture docs, module structure, and the relevant diff before inferring the intended architecture.

    line 20
  4. Distinctive:

    Verify findings against imports, call paths, tests, or build rules.

    line 27

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 70 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Architecture Review Skill

Use this skill as an architecture-specific review lens for an existing system, proposal, or diff. Always load review-verification-protocol before reporting findings. For repository change reviews, also load code-review.

Do not use it for simple code changes with no boundary impact. Use the matching Clean, Hexagonal, Onion, or DDD skill when the primary task is designing or implementing an architecture rather than reviewing one.

Workflow

  1. Read project-local guidance, architecture docs, module structure, and the relevant diff before inferring the intended architecture.
  2. Map dependency direction, module and bounded-context boundaries, ports, adapters, and framework or persistence edges.
  3. Identify concrete leakage, cycles, misplaced policy, and boundary bypasses.
  4. Distinguish intentional hybrid choices from accidental drift; prefer coherent, testable structure over pattern purity.
  5. Verify findings against imports, call paths, tests, or build rules. Record skipped checks and residual architectural risk.

Output

Return findings ordered by severity with file-level evidence, impact, the smallest practical correction, skipped validation, and residual risk.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.