persistent-memory
Skill20 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Persists topic-scoped context across conversations as plain markdown with write, read, consolidate, and forget operations, a never-store list for secrets, and a consent preview before every write. Triggers on "remember this", "save to memory", "what do you remember about", "forget that", "/persistent-memory".
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- yantrikos/yantrikdb-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- edenbuilds/agentlooptheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- songjiun10-collab/Senior-thinking-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 12, 2026
- aws-solutions/konductortheir own version, first seen Sep 23, 2026
- dbozic/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 18, 2026
- rainypilgrimage/persistent-memorytheir own version, first seen Aug 2, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- songjiun10-collab/Senior-thinking-skills★ 87same name
- yantrikos/yantrikdb-mcp★ 24same name
- aws-solutions/konductor★ 11same name
- rainypilgrimage/persistent-memory★ 4same name
- NullLabTests/agentkit★ 2same name
- whaojie797-design/Novera-AI-skills★ 2same name
- dbozic/claude-skills★ 1same name
- edenbuilds/agentloop★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository48 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/workflow/autonomous-workflow/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ideateSkill
- interviewSkill
- playwright-trace-analyzerSkill
- profile-optimizerSkill
- rum-trackingSkill
- screencastSkill
- video-analyserSkill
- youtube-transcriptSkill
- create-skillSkill
- docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- optimize-claude-mdSkill
- attach-mediaSkill
- ci-auto-fixSkill
- create-prSkill
- github-actions-authorSkill
- resolve-conflictsSkill
- animations-nativeSkill
- animationsSkill
- behavioral-designSkill
- chartingSkill
- storybookSkill
- uxSkill
- visual-designSkill
- ai-engineeringSkill
- confidenceSkill
- criticalSkill
- impact-mapSkill
- jev-assertSkill
- measurableSkill
- optimize-approachSkill
- polishSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- review-loopSkill
- tddSkill
- verify-behaviorSkill
- aw-verifySkill
- e2e-testing-mobileSkill
- e2e-testingSkill
- telemetry-verifySkill
- ui-verifySkill
- autonomous-workflowSkill
- aw-create-planSkill
- aw-create-walkthroughSkill
- fix-bugSkill
- implement-suggestionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 64
If no scope is provided, ask once (single batched message) — never guess.
- Distinctive: line 110
Every operation is gated. Do not proceed to the next phase until the prior phase's gate passes.
- Very specific: line 217
Consent before persistence: Every write shows the user a diff preview unless --auto is passed.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Persistent Memory
Capture, recall, consolidate, and forget memories scoped to a user-chosen
topic (e.g. parenting, work, relationship-anna) as plain markdown
files, so any future conversation can pick up where the last one left off.
This
SKILL.mdis a thin index. Operation pipelines, taxonomy, privacy rules, integration patterns, and scaling guidance live inrules/*.mdand load on demand. Literal artefact templates live intemplates/*.md. Worked examples and citations live inreferences/*.md. Read only what the current operation asks for.
Mode Detection
Parse $ARGUMENTS (first token) and detect the operation:
| Operation | Default | Trigger phrases |
write | yes | "remember", "save to memory", "add to memory", $0 == "write" |
read | "recall", "load memory", "what do you remember about", $0 == "read" | |
consolidate | "consolidate memory", "compress memory", $0 == "consolidate" | |
forget | "forget that", "delete memory", "redact", $0 == "forget" | |
list | "list memory", "what scopes do I have", $0 == "list" |
State the detected operation and resolved scope in one line before continuing. Example:
Operation: write
Scope: parenting
Storage tier: home (~/.agent-memory/parenting/)If no scope is provided, ask once (single batched message) — never guess.
Required Reading by Operation
Load on demand — do not preload.
| Operation | Files |
write | rules/storage-layout.md, rules/write-pipeline.md, rules/memory-taxonomy.md, rules/privacy-and-consent.md |
read | rules/storage-layout.md, rules/read-pipeline.md |
consolidate | rules/consolidate-pipeline.md, rules/memory-taxonomy.md |
forget | rules/forget-pipeline.md, rules/privacy-and-consent.md |
list | rules/storage-layout.md |
| integration | rules/integration-with-skills.md |
| scaling | rules/scaling-tiers.md |
| pre-flight | rules/quality-checklist.md, rules/anti-patterns.md |
Storage Layout (one-line summary; full rules in rules/storage-layout.md)
Three tiers; the user picks per invocation, or accepts the default.
| Tier | Path | Committed? | Default for |
home (default) | ~/.agent-memory/<scope>/ | No | Personal scopes (parenting, work) |
project-local | <repo>/.agent/memory/<scope>/ | No (gitignore) | Per-project private notes |
project-shared | <repo>/memory/<scope>/ | Yes | Team-shared project knowledge |
Per-scope directory layout (identical across tiers):
<storage-root>/<scope>/
├── INDEX.md # Curated, ≤ 200 lines; always loaded by `read`
├── entries/ # Individual memory entries; loaded on demand
│ └── <yyyy-mm-dd>-<slug>.md
├── archive/ # Consolidated / superseded entries (audit trail)
└── AUDIT.log # Append-only ledger of write / consolidate / forgetCore Workflow
Every operation is gated. Do not proceed to the next phase until the prior phase's gate passes.
write (default)
| Phase | Name | Rule | Gate |
| 0 | Resolve scope + tier | rules/storage-layout.md | Scope name + storage tier confirmed; directory created |
| 1 | Privacy pre-flight | rules/privacy-and-consent.md | No secrets / PII on the never-store list slip through |
| 2 | Extract candidates | rules/write-pipeline.md | Candidate list produced with type, confidence, source per item |
| 3 | Compare to existing | rules/write-pipeline.md | Each candidate tagged ADD / UPDATE / DELETE / NOOP |
| 4 | Consent preview | rules/privacy-and-consent.md | User saw the diff and approved (unless --auto flag) |
| 5 | Write + audit | rules/write-pipeline.md | INDEX updated, entry files written, AUDIT.log line appended |
read
| Phase | Name | Rule | Gate |
| 0 | Resolve scope | rules/storage-layout.md | Scope directory exists; INDEX.md present (or report empty) |
| 1 | Load INDEX | rules/read-pipeline.md | INDEX content surfaced to current conversation |
| 2 | On-demand fetch | rules/read-pipeline.md | Detail entries fetched only when INDEX points to them |
consolidate
| Phase | Name | Rule | Gate |
| 0 | Snapshot | rules/consolidate-pipeline.md | Pre-consolidation state captured (path + file count) |
| 1 | Group + merge | rules/consolidate-pipeline.md | Semantically similar entries grouped; merge plan drafted |
| 2 | Prune stale | rules/consolidate-pipeline.md | Entries past staleness cutoff flagged for archive |
| 3 | Preview + apply | rules/consolidate-pipeline.md | User saw before / after summary and approved |
| 4 | Rewrite INDEX | rules/consolidate-pipeline.md | INDEX reflects new state; AUDIT.log appended |
forget
| Phase | Name | Rule | Gate |
| 0 | Resolve target | rules/forget-pipeline.md | Memory id, slug, or query resolves to exactly one entry set |
| 1 | Show + confirm | rules/forget-pipeline.md | User saw the entries and explicitly confirmed |
| 2 | Delete or redact | rules/forget-pipeline.md | Entries removed (or redacted); INDEX + AUDIT.log updated |
list
Walk every storage tier the user has enabled, print every scope with entry counts and last-updated timestamps. No writes.
Integration With Other Skills
This skill is model-invocable (disable-model-invocation: false)
so host workflows can call it programmatically. Two ways to invoke it:
- Explicit — the user types
/persistent-memory write parentingor/persistent-memory read parenting. - Runtime, from a host skill — the host skill's
SKILL.mdcontains a one-line pointer block that callsSkill("persistent-memory", "read <scope>")when the host runs.
The second form is the canonical integration. Runtime Skill() calls
require disable-model-invocation: false — without it the Skill tool
refuses the call at the harness layer (you'd see
Skill X cannot be used with Skill tool due to disable-model-invocation).
See
rules/integration-with-skills.md
for the full contract and the literal snippet at
templates/pointer-snippet.md.
| Pattern | Token cost | Magic | Best for |
| Pointer | INDEX only, on skill load | None | The default. Explicit, debuggable, no hook. |
| Hook | INDEX every session | High | Always-on scopes (e.g. a personal assistant). |
For the parenting example: add one block to parenting/SKILL.md:
> **Persistent memory:** Before responding, run
> `Skill("persistent-memory", "read parenting")` to load accumulated
> context for this scope.Scaling Tiers (full guidance in rules/scaling-tiers.md)
| Tier | Backend | Use when |
| 1 | Plain markdown (this skill, default) | ≤ ~500 entries per scope, single user, no semantic search needed |
| 2 | Markdown + SQLite FTS index (this skill, opt-in) | Up to ~5k entries per scope, keyword search beats full-INDEX scan |
| 3 | Markdown blobs + local vector DB (Chroma, Qdrant) | Semantic recall ("what did we discuss about X") matters |
| 4 | Managed memory layer (Mem0, Letta, Zep) | Multi-user, multi-tenant, > 10k entries, graph relationships, hosted SLA |
Graduate one tier at a time. The skill ships a migration recipe in
rules/scaling-tiers.md for moving from
markdown to SQLite, and from SQLite to a vector DB, without losing
entries.
Core Principles
- Plain text, local-first. Memory is markdown the user can read, edit, grep, and delete with standard tools. No proprietary format.
- Progressive disclosure. INDEX is small and always loaded; detail entries load on demand. Modeled on Claude Code's MEMORY.md.
- Two-phase write. Extract candidates first, then resolve each against existing entries with ADD / UPDATE / DELETE / NOOP. Modeled on Mem0's extraction + update pipeline.
- Consent before persistence. Every write shows the user a diff
preview unless
--autois passed; secrets and PII on the never-store list are refused outright. - Forgetting is a feature. A clear
forgetoperation is part of the surface, not an afterthought. Required for privacy and for pruning entrenched mistakes (see Reflexion entrenchment warning). - One scope, one purpose. Resist mega-scopes ("life"). Split into
parenting,health,worketc. so the INDEX stays under 200 lines. - Markdown until it hurts. Stay on Tier 1 until a concrete signal (search latency, INDEX bloat, multi-user) forces a graduation.
Anti-patterns (one-liner — full list in rules/anti-patterns.md)
- Writing to memory without showing the user the diff first.
- Storing secrets, credentials, or government IDs (refuse outright).
- Mega-scopes that swell the INDEX past 200 lines.
- Letting the model auto-write without scope confirmation.
- Re-recording the same fact instead of UPDATE-ing the existing entry.
- Deleting an entry without an AUDIT.log line.
- Skipping consolidation forever — the INDEX rots and recall degrades.
- Committing
~/.agent-memory/to a public repo.
Definition of Done
A write run is done when:
- Scope and storage tier explicitly resolved (no defaults assumed silently).
- Privacy pre-flight passed (no never-store items in candidates).
- Candidate list shown to the user with ADD / UPDATE / DELETE / NOOP tags.
- User approved (or
--autoflag was explicit). - Entry files written; INDEX updated; AUDIT.log line appended.
- One-line summary delivered: "Saved N memories to
<scope>(<tier>)."
A read run is done when:
- Scope resolved; if no INDEX exists, user is told the scope is empty.
- INDEX content is now in the conversation context.
- Detail entries are fetched only when the INDEX references them.
A consolidate run is done when:
- Before / after summary shown (entry count delta, INDEX line delta).
- User explicitly approved.
- AUDIT.log line appended with operation, timestamp, and counts.
A forget run is done when:
- Target entries shown verbatim before deletion.
- User confirmed (typed "yes" or
--confirmflag). - Entries removed (or redacted); INDEX updated; AUDIT.log line appended.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

