agentleFS
mthinesmthines/agent-skills/skills/analysis/interview/SKILL.md

interview

Skill20 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub

Aligns on a request's scope before planning — researches the codebase, surfaces unknowns, non-goals, and success criteria, asks batched clarifying questions only when research cannot resolve them, and writes a confirmed `brief.md`. Triggers on "align on scope", "interview me", "clarify the request", "/interview".

94 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use fetch-library-docs, contributor and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Rehan-Ul-HaqSkill

    fetch-library-docs

    Fetches official documentation for external libraries and frameworks (React, Next.js, Prisma, FastAPI, Express, Tailwind, MongoDB, etc.) with 60-90% token savings via content-type filtering. Use this skill when implementing features using library APIs, debugging library-specific errors, troubleshooting configuration issues, installing or setting up frameworks, integrating third-party packages, upgrading between library versions, or looking up correct API patterns and best practices. Triggers automatically during coding work - fetch docs before writing library code to get correct patterns, not after guessing wrong.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • NimbleBrainIncSkill

    contributor

    Get started contributing to NimbleBrain open source — find an integration to build, set up your environment, propose an idea, or check on your work. Use when onboarding as a contributor. Triggers include "I'm a new contributor", "what should I build", "show me open issues", "file an issue".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • mjunaidcaSkill

    browsing-with-playwright

    Browser automation using Playwright MCP. Navigate websites, fill forms, click elements, take screenshots, and extract data. Use when tasks require web browsing, form submission, web scraping, UI testing, or any browser interaction. NOT when only fetching static content (use curl/wget instead).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • qa-amanSkill

    teach-me

    Teach a topic, video, article, codebase change, spec, or transcript until the user demonstrably understands it, using staged instruction, a running checklist doc, and quizzes. Use whenever the user says "teach me", "explain this in detail", "help me understand X", "/teach-me", "walk me through this", "I want to learn X", "understand this deeply", or pastes a YouTube URL, article, paper, PR, or spec and asks to understand it rather than summarize it. Also use when the user wants study notes or raw material from a source they are learning. Do NOT use for a quick factual lookup, a summary request, or when the user just wants the answer.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • trebaudSkill

    find-unknowns

    Workflow for surfacing a task's unknowns before, during, and after implementation — blind spot pass, brainstorm/prototype, interview, references, implementation plan, deviation notes, quiz. Use when starting work in an unfamiliar domain or codebase, when a task feels underspecified, when the user says "find my unknowns", "blindspot pass", "what am I missing", "help me scope this", or when a long task came back wrong.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • donatassimkusSkill

    offer

    Offer design, pricing strategy, and business model architecture. Invoke when asked about making an offer better, pricing a product or service, naming an offer, raising prices, generating fast cash, increasing lifetime value, finding the right customer, qualifying buyers, or designing a business model where customers pay for their own acquisition. Use when someone says their offer isn't converting, they need to charge more, they want to add bonuses or guarantees, or they need a money model for their business.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 80 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If $ARGUMENTS is empty, use the current conversation's active request.

    line 51
  2. Very specific:

    When the request is already crisp and research answers the open questions, it asks nothing, writes a one-line pass note plus the brief, and …

    line 58

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 80 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Interview

Turns an underspecified request into a confirmed, thought-through scope before a single line is planned or written. It restates and diffs the request, researches the code so its questions are specific, surfaces the unknowns and non-goals, interviews the user only where research falls short, and emits a brief.md that planning consumes.

This SKILL.md is a thin index. Phase procedures live in rules/*.md and load on demand. A full worked run lives in references/interview-example.md.

Contents

  • When it runs
  • Workflow
  • Required reading by phase
  • Core principles
  • Anti-patterns
  • Definition of done

When it runs

$ARGUMENTS is the request to align on (free text). If $ARGUMENTS is empty, use the current conversation's active request; if there is none, ask what to scope — never interview against a guessed request.

FlagDefaultMeaning
--non-interactiveoffDo not prompt the user. Surface the questions inside brief.md under Open questions, proceed on stated assumptions, and set the readiness verdict. For headless callers that cannot prompt.

This skill is adaptive. When the request is already crisp and research answers the open questions, it asks nothing, writes a one-line pass note plus the brief, and returns ready. It interrupts only for a genuine, load-bearing unknown — see rules/readiness-gate.md.

Relation to aw and ideate (precedence)

  • Autonomous-implementation asks ("implement X autonomously", "ship this", /aw) are owned by aw, which runs this interview inside its Phase 0 (on demand for Full tier — see rules/aw-integration.md) — do not also fire standalone; let aw drive.
  • Standalone /interview is for the explicit "help me scope this first" moment on non-aw or ambiguous work.
  • For solution options, not scope, use /ideate — it diverges and scores; this skill converges on the one scope.

Workflow

Five phases, each with a gate. Do not advance until the gate passes.

PhaseNameRule fileGate
0Restate & diffrules/research-grounding.mdRequest restated in own words; every delta from the user's words surfaced.
1Research the groundrules/research-grounding.mdAffected areas, prior art, patterns, and constraints located in the code.
2Surface unknowns (gate)rules/readiness-gate.md, rules/consultative-completeness.mdEvery unknown enumerated and classified blocking vs advisory; interview-or-pass decided.
3Interviewrules/question-design.mdBlocking + high-value unknowns asked in ≤ 2 batched rounds, or skipped (adaptive pass).
4Confirm & briefrules/brief-artifact.mdUnderstanding confirmed; brief.md written; readiness verdict set.

Required reading by phase

Load on demand — do not preload.

PhaseFiles
0–1rules/research-grounding.md
2rules/readiness-gate.md, rules/consultative-completeness.md
3rules/question-design.md
4rules/brief-artifact.md
awrules/aw-integration.md — how aw delegates to this skill.

Core principles

  1. Research before asking. A question the codebase already answers is noise. Ground every question in what the code shows so it is specific ("reuse PrStatusCache or add a cache?"), not generic ("what do you want?"). See rules/research-grounding.md.
  2. Interrupt only for load-bearing unknowns. Classify each unknown blocking vs advisory. Ask about blocking ones; proceed on advisory ones and record the assumption. Silence is the correct output for a crisp request. See rules/readiness-gate.md.
  3. Batch the questions. One prioritized round via AskUserQuestion, two at most. Never drip questions one at a time. See rules/question-design.md.
  4. Consultative, not stenographic. Capture intent and pressure-test completeness: non-goals, edge cases, success criteria, constraints. This is the "is it thought-through" half. See rules/consultative-completeness.md.
  5. Converge, don't diverge. This skill pins down the one thing to build. It hands divergent option-generation to /ideate, adversarial plan review to /critical, and readiness scoring to /confidence. Do not duplicate them.
  6. The brief is the deliverable. A confirmed, self-contained brief.md plus a readiness verdict — nothing more. It writes no product code. See rules/brief-artifact.md.

Anti-patterns

  • Asking a question the code answers. Fix: research first (Phase 1).
  • Dripping questions one at a time across turns. Fix: batch into one AskUserQuestion round.
  • Interviewing a request that is already crisp. Fix: honor the adaptive pass — write the brief, return ready, ask nothing.
  • Generating solution options. Fix: that is /ideate; this skill converges on scope.
  • Adversarially red-teaming an implementation plan. Fix: that is /critical; run it after a plan exists.
  • Producing a scored gate verdict. Fix: that is /confidence; this skill elicits the inputs a score needs.
  • Writing product code or a plan. Fix: stop at brief.md; hand off to planning.

Definition of done

  • Request restated in own words; every delta from the user's words surfaced (Phase 0).
  • Affected code areas, prior art, and constraints located (Phase 1).
  • Every unknown enumerated and classified blocking vs advisory (Phase 2).
  • Blocking + high-value unknowns resolved via ≤ 2 batched rounds, or a clean adaptive pass logged (Phase 3).
  • brief.md written to .agent/{branch}/brief.md (re-run updates it in place).
  • Readiness verdict set: ready | ready-with-assumptions | blocked.
  • One-line summary delivered naming the verdict and pointing at the brief.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.