agentleFS
mojopolymojopoly/three-loops/skills/tdd/SKILL.md

tdd

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Red-green-refactor loop for logic-heavy code. Use for date/time math, state machines, policy and pricing functions, parsers, and anything where a wrong answer is silent — not for glue code or UI layout.

194 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use capture-learning-tools, design-frontend-dev and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • The-Vibe-CompanySkill

    capture-learning-tools

    Turn technical conversations, bugs, CI failures, review comments,

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • The-Vibe-CompanySkill

    design-frontend-dev

    Clean Impeccable frontend design skill. Use when the user wants to

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • tristanphvnSkill

    ketchup-video

    Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • jaydubya818Skill

    figure-it-out

    Use when novel or multi-phase work needs an auditable workflow and no narrower playbook fits.

    Also in 54 projects that use this

  • jaydubya818Skill

    principle-laziness-protocol

    Apply when a refactor is adding wrappers or abstractions instead of simplifying.

    Also in 45 projects that use this

  • +2 more from The-Vibe-Company
  • +5 more from jaydubya818

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 186 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Never weaken an assertion to make it pass.

    line 53

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 186 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

TDD

Generated tests that arrive with generated code prove only that the code matches the generator's understanding — which is exactly what is in question. Writing the test first, and watching it fail, is what turns a test into evidence.

Where it earns its cost

  • Date/time and timezone math (DST transitions, "next business day")
  • State machines and status transitions (who may move what, when)
  • Policy functions: pricing, quotas, rate limits, permissions, scoring
  • Parsers, serializers, and anything with an inverse to round-trip
  • Concurrency decisions expressed as pure functions (poll intervals, staleness cutoffs, retry budgets)

Where it doesn't

Glue, wiring, UI layout, one-line delegations. Testing those is ceremony; /verify-live covers them.

The loop

  1. Red — write one test for one behavior. Run it. Watch it fail, and read the failure: a test that fails for the wrong reason (import error, wrong fixture) is not yet a test. State what the failure proves.
  2. Green — the minimal change that passes. Resist bundling the next behavior in.
  3. Refactor — with everything green, remove the duplication you just created. Tests must not change meaning during refactor.
  4. Repeat, one behavior per cycle. Commit at green boundaries (test: + feat: pairs, or one commit per cycle).

Design rules the loop enforces

  • Injectable clock and randomness — any function that reads "now" takes it as a parameter (or a clock interface). Untestable time is where the worst silent bugs live; pin fixtures to hostile dates (DST boundaries, leap days, year ends, month-length edges).
  • No network, no database, no filesystem in unit tests. If the logic can't be exercised without infrastructure, extract the decision into a pure function and test that; the wiring gets covered live.
  • Boundary-first cases: empty, one, maximum, one-past-maximum, and the hostile middle (the 2:30 AM that doesn't exist on spring-forward day).

Honesty rules

  • Never weaken an assertion to make it pass. If the test was wrong, say so and rewrite it; if the code is wrong, fix the code.
  • Report results as they are: "12 pass, 1 fail" with the failure, not "mostly passing".
  • A behavior discovered during /diagnose gets its regression test through this loop — red first, on the real reproduction.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.