agentleFS
milad-ahmdmilad-ahmd/agent-skills/skills/launch-post-writer/SKILL.md

launch-post-writer

Skill5 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub

Writes launch content for an open-source project or feature, including an X/Twitter thread, LinkedIn post, Show HN post, Reddit post, Product Hunt tagline, and dev.to article outline, based on the actual repo. Use when the user asks to announce, launch, promote, or write a post or thread about a repo, release, or feature.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the README, the main features, the install command, recent releases or the changelog, and the demo assets (GIFs, screenshots).

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Ask for anything missing: links, demo media, the author's handle, launch date.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Reddit: write for the subreddit's culture and rules (check whether self-promotion is allowed).

    line 28
  4. Distinctive:

    Only real claims: No invented stars, users, benchmarks or testimonials.

    line 36
  5. Distinctive:

    Use specifics, not hype: "cuts review comments from 40 to 8" beats "revolutionary AI".

    line 37

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Launch Post Writer

Turn a repo into launch posts people actually click, without the cringe.

1. Research the repo

Read the README, the main features, the install command, recent releases or the changelog, and the demo assets (GIFs, screenshots). Identify: the pain, the "aha" moment (a before/after), who it's for and how to try it in under 60 seconds. Ask for anything missing: links, demo media, the author's handle, launch date.

2. Write every format (each tailored to its platform)

X / Twitter thread (5–8 posts)

  1. Hook: the pain or a surprising result, plus the demo GIF. No links in post 1. 2–5. One feature per post, each with a concrete example.
  2. How to install (one line).
  3. Link to the repo, plus "⭐ if useful" and an invitation to give feedback.

LinkedIn: a story format. Start with the problem you hit, then what you built, what you learned, and the link. Short paragraphs, 3–5 hashtags.

Show HN: the title is Show HN: <Name> – <what it does in plain words>. The body is a modest first-person explanation: why you built it, how it works technically, its limitations, and a request for feedback. No marketing language at all.

Reddit: write for the subreddit's culture and rules (check whether self-promotion is allowed). Lead with value, and disclose that you're the author.

Product Hunt: a tagline of 60 characters or fewer, a description of 260 characters or fewer, and a maker's first comment.

dev.to / blog: a title plus an outline of a tutorial-style article built around solving the problem.

Rules

  • Only real claims. No invented stars, users, benchmarks or testimonials.
  • Use specifics, not hype: "cuts review comments from 40 to 8" beats "revolutionary AI".
  • Emoji in moderation (fine on X, minimal on HN).
  • Include alt text suggestions for images.
  • End with a launch checklist: post times (Tue–Thu morning US time), reply to every comment within the first 2 hours, cross-link the posts, and pin the repo on your profile.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.