qraspi-questions
Skill3 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
QRASPI Questions phase -- surface what is unknown about a NEW system before any research, architecture, or skeleton begins. Use for "/qraspi-questions <project>", "new project from scratch", "greenfield X", "questions for a brand-new system". Do NOT use for QRSPI (an EXISTING codebase / adding a feature) -- that routes to qrspi-questions. Do NOT use for the deprecated RPI workflow.
In this repository86 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- project-templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- project-templates/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- alembic-migration-managerSkill
- architecture-journalSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- automated-code-reviewSkill
- axum-scaffolderSkill
- capture-consolidateSkill
- cargo-package-scaffoldSkill
- code-review-coachSkill
- confluence-guide-writerSkill
- dependency-mapperSkill
- doc-syncSkill
- dotnet-architecture-checklistSkill
- dotnet-controller-api-scaffolderSkill
- dotnet-security-reviewSkill
- dotnet-vertical-sliceSkill
- ef-migration-managerSkill
- email-captureSkill
- environment-healthSkill
- evaluate-testsSkill
- fastapi-scaffolderSkill
- fitness-functionsSkill
- jira-comment-writerSkill
- legacy-migration-analyzerSkill
- minimal-api-scaffolderSkill
- nuget-package-scaffoldSkill
- oss-vettingSkill
- pattern-tradeoff-analyzerSkill
- php-api-scaffolderSkill
- php-architecture-checklistSkill
- php-feature-sliceSkill
- php-migration-managerSkill
- php-package-scaffoldSkill
- php-security-reviewSkill
- pr-feedback-writerSkill
- pypi-package-scaffoldSkill
- python-architecture-checklistSkill
- python-feature-sliceSkill
- python-modernization-analyzerSkill
- python-security-reviewSkill
- qraspi-architectureSkill
- qraspi-graduateSkill
- qraspi-implementSkill
- qraspi-planSkill
- qraspi-researchSkill
- qraspi-skeletonSkill
- qrspi-implementSkill
- qrspi-planSkill
- qrspi-questionsSkill
- qrspi-researchSkill
- qrspi-specSkill
- react-app-scaffolderSkill
- react-architecture-checklistSkill
- react-component-scaffolderSkill
- react-feature-sliceSkill
- react-modernization-analyzerSkill
- react-security-reviewSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 29
ASK, never answer -- this phase produces questions, not solutions, research, or architecture
- Very specific: line 33
STOP after writing questions.md -- the human answers inline before Research begins
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
QRASPI Questions
"If you do not know how to ask the right question, you discover nothing." -- W. Edwards Deming
Core Philosophy
The Questions phase is the first alignment gate of QRASPI's greenfield (V0/V1) path. Before any
domain research, architecture, or skeleton, the agent surfaces every unknown about the new system
as a targeted question and STOPS for the human to answer. Greenfield has no codebase to constrain
the answers, so the danger is a narrow question set that silently commits the design to one
shape. This phase defends against that with a fixed six-category checklist: it enumerates a
question for every greenfield concern whether or not the user named it. A skipped category becomes
an unexamined assumption that cascades into the ADRs; surfacing it here costs one edit in
questions.md, not an architecture rewrite later.
Non-Negotiable Constraints:
- ASK, never answer -- this phase produces questions, not solutions, research, or architecture
- Cover ALL SIX greenfield categories -- functional scope · quality attributes (the -ilities) · integration / external systems · compliance / regulatory · deployment / runtime target · data & domain model -- enumerate a question for every category, named by the user or not
- STOP after writing
questions.md-- the human answers inline before Research begins - One project folder per project -- every QRASPI artifact co-locates there
- CONTEXT BUDGET: keep utilization under 40%. At 60%, write
questions.mdwith progress and tell the user to start a fresh session.
Workflow
PRE-FLIGHT
[ ] Determine the project slug (kebab-case) and today's date
[ ] Project folder = thoughts/shared/qraspi/YYYY-MM-DD-{slug}/ (create if absent)
[ ] If an ANSWERED questions.md already exists here, this phase is DONE -> route to /qraspi-research
SURFACE
Walk the SIX greenfield categories in order; for EACH, write at least one specific,
answerable question -- never a vague prompt, never skip a category:
functional scope · quality attributes (-ilities) · integration / external systems ·
compliance / regulatory · deployment / runtime target · data & domain model
Mark any question that BLOCKS architecture as [BLOCKING]
WRITE
Create thoughts/shared/qraspi/YYYY-MM-DD-{slug}/questions.md
Use references/questions-template.md
Set status: awaiting-answers
STOP
Tell the user: answer the questions inline in questions.md, then start a NEW session
and run /qraspi-research. Do NOT proceed to Research yourself.Exit criteria: questions.md written with status awaiting-answers; all six greenfield
categories carry at least one question with blocking items flagged; user told to answer inline and
start a fresh Research session.
State Block
<qraspi-questions-state>
phase: PRE-FLIGHT | SURFACE | WRITE | STOP | COMPLETE
project_slug: [kebab-slug]
project_folder: thoughts/shared/qraspi/YYYY-MM-DD-{slug}/
areas_covered: [functional | quality-attributes | integration | compliance | deployment | domain]
# all six MUST be present before WRITE
question_count: [count]
blocking_count: [count]
context_budget: under-40 | approaching-60 | checkpoint-now
status: awaiting-answers | complete
</qraspi-questions-state>Output Template
See references/questions-template.md for the full questions.md structure and frontmatter.
Integration with Other Skills
| Skill | Relationship |
qraspi-research | Next phase. Consumes the ANSWERED questions.md to scope the landscape map. |
qraspi-architecture | Downstream. Every ADR's decision traces back to an answer captured here. |
qrspi-questions | Brownfield sibling. Use it instead when the system already EXISTS and you are adding a feature. |
spec-coach | Use instead when you want an interactive design conversation, not a one-shot question dump. |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

