Python Architecture Checklist

"A checklist cannot fly a plane, but a pilot cannot fly safely without one." — Atul Gawande

Core Philosophy

Shared across the dotnet / python / php / rust architecture checklists — same values, language-specific checks.

Workflow

Shared skeleton: DETECT → SCAN → REPORT → RECOMMEND.

DETECT     Python version (pyproject.toml / .python-version), framework (FastAPI/Django/Flask),
           layout (src/ vs flat, packages), and whether a test suite exists. Record findings; if a
           version cannot be determined, ask — never assume 3.13.

SCAN       Run the Python Checklist below section by section. Gather evidence with tooling:
             ruff check .         # style + lint + complexity drift
             mypy <pkg>           # type completeness and correctness
             radon cc -s <pkg>    # cyclomatic complexity hot spots
             radon mi <pkg>       # maintainability index
           Every violation becomes a finding with file:line and a severity (critical/high/medium/low).

REPORT     Emit the graded report (Output Template). Grade = function of counted findings.

RECOMMEND  Prioritize: critical → quick wins → modernization. Version-gate every recommendation;
           never suggest an API absent from the detected Python version.

Python Checklist (language-specific)

Tooling config: ruff · mypy. Full section-by-section list + grounding query map: review checklist.

State Block

<arch-checklist-state>
language: python
mode: DETECT | SCAN | REPORT | RECOMMEND | COMPLETE
detected: [python 3.x | framework | layout | tests:yes/no]
issues_found: [critical:N high:N medium:N low:N]
last_action: [what was just done]
next_action: [what should happen next]
</arch-checklist-state>

Output Template

Shared across all four architecture checklists.

## Architecture Checklist: [project] (Python)
**Version**: [3.x] | **Framework**: [FastAPI/Django/Flask/none] | **Tests**: [yes/no]

| Section | Pass | Fail | Warn |
|---------|------|------|------|
| Boundaries / Types / Complexity / Deps / Async / Config / Tests | … | … | … |

### Grade: [A–F]
Grading: **A** 0 crit/0 high/≤3 med · **B** 0 crit/≤2 high · **C** 0 crit, gaps in one area ·
**D** 1+ crit · **F** fundamental problems (no boundaries, secrets in code, untyped public API).

| Severity | Location | Finding | Recommendation |
|----------|----------|---------|----------------|
| CRITICAL | file:line | [pattern] | [version-gated fix] |

**Quick wins**: [low-effort, high-impact] · **Modernization**: [larger items with effort estimate]

AI Discipline Rules

• Detect the Python version first. Recommending match statements or tomllib to a 3.9 project produces invalid findings.
• Evidence or it is not a finding. Run the tools; cite file:line. Never grade on vibes.
• Architecture, not security. Vulnerability findings (injection, deserialization, secrets exposure) belong to python-security-review — note them and route there.
• Do not rewrite during a review. Produce findings + recommendations; the team decides and tdd drives the fix.

Integration with Other Skills

• architecture-review — When the grade is D/F, escalate to the Socratic critic: this checklist finds what is wrong; architecture-review builds why.
• python-security-review — Companion for the security dimension (OWASP, bandit, pip-audit).
• python-feature-slice — Correct-pattern reference when the checklist flags structural violations.
• tdd — Methodology for adding tests the checklist flags as missing, and for driving any refactor.
• dotnet / php / rust-architecture-checklist — Sibling skills sharing this exact Core Values + workflow + output.