dotnet-vertical-slice
Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Scaffold vertical slice architecture with CQRS + FreeMediator, including optional Telerik Blazor UI generation. Use when creating feature-based .NET projects with command/query separation and pipeline behaviors. Do NOT use when the project uses layer-based (N-tier) architecture — this skill enforces feature folder structure and will conflict with existing layer conventions.
In this repository86 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- project-templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- project-templates/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- alembic-migration-managerSkill
- architecture-journalSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- automated-code-reviewSkill
- axum-scaffolderSkill
- capture-consolidateSkill
- cargo-package-scaffoldSkill
- code-review-coachSkill
- confluence-guide-writerSkill
- dependency-mapperSkill
- doc-syncSkill
- dotnet-architecture-checklistSkill
- dotnet-controller-api-scaffolderSkill
- dotnet-security-reviewSkill
- ef-migration-managerSkill
- email-captureSkill
- environment-healthSkill
- evaluate-testsSkill
- fastapi-scaffolderSkill
- fitness-functionsSkill
- jira-comment-writerSkill
- legacy-migration-analyzerSkill
- minimal-api-scaffolderSkill
- nuget-package-scaffoldSkill
- oss-vettingSkill
- pattern-tradeoff-analyzerSkill
- php-api-scaffolderSkill
- php-architecture-checklistSkill
- php-feature-sliceSkill
- php-migration-managerSkill
- php-package-scaffoldSkill
- php-security-reviewSkill
- pr-feedback-writerSkill
- pypi-package-scaffoldSkill
- python-architecture-checklistSkill
- python-feature-sliceSkill
- python-modernization-analyzerSkill
- python-security-reviewSkill
- qraspi-architectureSkill
- qraspi-graduateSkill
- qraspi-implementSkill
- qraspi-planSkill
- qraspi-questionsSkill
- qraspi-researchSkill
- qraspi-skeletonSkill
- qrspi-implementSkill
- qrspi-planSkill
- qrspi-questionsSkill
- qrspi-researchSkill
- qrspi-specSkill
- react-app-scaffolderSkill
- react-architecture-checklistSkill
- react-component-scaffolderSkill
- react-feature-sliceSkill
- react-modernization-analyzerSkill
- react-security-reviewSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 55
Search before scaffolding each new component type.
- Very specific: line 120
When the project uses Telerik UI for Blazor, generate Blazor pages alongside the backend slice.
- Very specific: line 150
Verify the handler implements IRequestHandler<TRequest, TResponse>
- Distinctive: line 151
Verify FreeMediator registration scans the correct assembly
- Distinctive: line 152
Verify the handler is public, non-abstract, non-static
- Distinctive: line 153
Check that the request type matches what is being sent
- Very specific: line 157
Verify ValidationBehavior<,> is registered as a pipeline behavior
- Very specific: line 158
Verify the validator implements AbstractValidator<TRequest>
- Distinctive: line 160
Verify behavior order: validation must run before the handler
- Distinctive: line 165
If handler coordinates multiple steps, consider domain events
- Distinctive: line 171
Use domain events for communication
- Distinctive: line 172
If truly interdependent, they are likely one feature incorrectly split
- Very specific: line 178
Verify each behavior calls next() and does not swallow exceptions
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Vertical Slice Architecture with CQRS + FreeMediator
"The whole idea is that the abstraction we use to reason about the system should be the feature, not the layer." -- Jimmy Bogard
Core Philosophy
This skill scaffolds and maintains vertical slice architecture in .NET projects using FreeMediator for CQRS and pipeline behaviors. Every feature is a self-contained unit. Layers are an implementation detail inside the slice, not a project-level organizing principle.
Non-Negotiable Constraints:
- Feature Isolation — Each feature lives in its own folder. No feature may reach into another feature's folder for types or logic.
- No Shared Base Handlers — Abstract base handlers and handler inheritance defeat the purpose of vertical slices. Each handler is independent.
- Handler-Per-Feature — Every command, query, or notification gets its own handler class. A single handler must never process multiple unrelated operations.
- Cross-Cutting via Pipeline — Validation, logging, transactions, and caching are pipeline behaviors, not base class methods.
- CQRS Separation Is Structural — Commands mutate state; queries return data. A single handler must never both read and write.
Domain Principles Table
| # | Principle | Description | Priority |
| 1 | Feature Isolation | Feature folder is self-contained. No imports between feature folders. Shared code lives in Common/ or Infrastructure/. | Critical |
| 2 | Handler Autonomy | Each handler owns its dependencies and logic. Duplication between handlers is acceptable and preferred over coupling. | Critical |
| 3 | Minimal Abstractions | Introduce abstractions only when three or more features demonstrate an identical, stable pattern. | High |
| 4 | Pipeline Composition | Cross-cutting concerns are composed via FreeMediator pipeline behaviors, not handler inheritance. | Critical |
| 5 | CQRS Boundary | Commands return at most an identifier or status. Queries return data and must not mutate state. | Critical |
| 6 | Request/Response Immutability | Request and response types are C# records — immutable value objects. | High |
| 7 | Explicit Dependencies | Handlers declare dependencies via constructor injection. No service locator or static helpers. | High |
| 8 | Validator Co-Location | FluentValidation validator lives in the same feature folder as its request and handler. | High |
| 9 | Endpoint Thinness | Endpoints only deserialize, mediate, and serialize. No business logic. | High |
| 10 | Test Proximity | Tests mirror the feature folder structure and test handler, validator, and endpoint as a unit. | Medium |
Knowledge Base Lookups
| Query | When to Call |
search_knowledge("vertical slice architecture CQRS feature folder .NET") | At session start |
search_knowledge("FreeMediator IRequest handler pipeline behavior .NET") | When scaffolding handlers or pipeline behaviors |
search_knowledge("FluentValidation IValidator async rule .NET") | When scaffolding validators |
search_knowledge("ASP.NET Core Minimal API TypedResults endpoint group") | When scaffolding endpoints |
search_knowledge("EF Core DbContext dependency injection scoped lifetime") | When scaffolding DbContext |
search_knowledge("C# record immutable request response DTO") | When defining request/response types |
Search before scaffolding each new component type. Cite the source path in generated code comments.
Workflow
Scaffold proceeds in phases: SCAFFOLD (create folder and stub files) → COMMAND or QUERY (implement handler) → PIPELINE (wire behaviors) → VALIDATE (run tests, verify isolation). Use a notification (INotification) when an event must fan out to multiple handlers. When a feature both reads and writes, split it: extract the write as a command and the read as a separate query. Pipeline behaviors (validation, logging, transactions, caching) belong in Infrastructure/Behaviors/ and are registered once in DI — they must never contain feature-specific conditional logic.
Pre-Flight Checklist
- Feature has a clear, single responsibility
- Feature name describes the action, not the layer (e.g.,
CreateOrder, notOrderService) - FreeMediator is registered in
Program.cs - FluentValidation is registered
- Pipeline behaviors registered in correct order
Features/directory exists in the project
State Block Format
<vslice-state>
step: [SCAFFOLD | COMMAND | QUERY | NOTIFICATION | PIPELINE | VALIDATE]
feature: [description]
pattern: [command | query | notification]
folder_path: [path to feature folder]
last_action: [what was just done]
next_action: [what should happen next]
blockers: [any issues]
</vslice-state>Example:
<vslice-state>
step: SCAFFOLD
feature: CreateOrder - creates a new order from a cart
pattern: command
folder_path: src/MyApp/Features/Orders/CreateOrder/
last_action: Created feature folder structure
next_action: Define CreateOrderCommand record and CreateOrderResponse record
blockers: none
</vslice-state>Output Templates
## Vertical Slice Session: [Feature Name]
**Pattern**: [Command | Query | Notification] | **Folder**: `Features/[Domain]/[FeatureName]/`
**Files created**: Request, Response, Handler, Validator, Endpoint
**State**: [current vslice-state block]
**Next**: [action]AI Discipline Rules
Never create shared base handlers. Each handler is a standalone class implementing IRequestHandler<TRequest, TResponse>. If two handlers look similar, that duplication is intentional — shared abstractions between handlers re-introduce the horizontal layering that vertical slices eliminate.
One feature per folder. A feature folder contains exactly one request type, one handler, one validator (if applicable), one endpoint, and one response type. Two handlers in one folder means split it.
No cross-feature imports. Handlers must not import types from another feature folder or dispatch to another feature's handler. Use domain events (INotification) or shared infrastructure services for inter-feature communication.
Pipeline behaviors are infrastructure. A behavior with conditional logic per feature type is a design error. Use marker interfaces on the request type (e.g., ICachedQuery) to vary behavior without adding feature knowledge to the behavior class. Behaviors live in Infrastructure/Behaviors/, never inside a feature folder.
Telerik Blazor UI Generation (Conditional)
When the project uses Telerik UI for Blazor, generate Blazor pages alongside the backend slice. Pages live in the feature folder under Pages/ and dispatch commands/queries via FreeMediator. Only generate when the project has Telerik Blazor dependencies.
Extended feature folder structure:
Features/{FeatureName}/
├── Commands/Create{Entity}/, Update{Entity}/, Delete{Entity}/
├── Queries/Get{Entity}ById/, Get{Entity}List/
├── DTOs/{Entity}Dto.cs, {Entity}ListDto.cs
├── Pages/{Entity}List.razor, {Entity}Edit.razor
├── Mapping/{Entity}MappingConfig.cs (Mapster)
└── Tests/Anti-Patterns Table
| Anti-Pattern | Why It's Wrong | Correct Approach |
| Generic CRUD handler | Couples all features; base class changes ripple everywhere. | Each handler is standalone. Accept duplication. |
| Shared response types | Forces features to conform to one shape; blocks independent evolution. | Each feature defines its own response record. |
| Fat endpoint with business logic | Logic in HTTP layer can't be unit-tested without HTTP infrastructure. | Endpoints only deserialize, mediate, serialize. |
| Handler calling another handler | Hidden runtime coupling; breaks feature isolation. | Use INotification events or shared infrastructure services. |
| Organizing by technical layer | Developers touch multiple folders for one feature. | Organize by feature; each folder contains all layers for that slice. |
| Validation in the handler | Mixes cross-cutting logic with business logic; not reusable. | FluentValidation validator + pipeline validation behavior. |
| Pipeline behaviors in feature folders | Behaviors are shared infrastructure, not feature-specific. | Behaviors live in Infrastructure/Behaviors/. |
Error Recovery
Handler Not Found at Runtime
InvalidOperationException — No handler registered for [RequestType]
- Verify the handler implements
IRequestHandler<TRequest, TResponse> - Verify FreeMediator registration scans the correct assembly
- Verify the handler is public, non-abstract, non-static
- Check that the request type matches what is being sent
Validator Not Running Before Handler
Handler executes with invalid data, no ValidationException thrown
- Verify
ValidationBehavior<,>is registered as a pipeline behavior - Verify the validator implements
AbstractValidator<TRequest> - Verify
services.AddValidatorsFromAssemblyContaining<Program>() - Verify behavior order: validation must run before the handler
Feature Folder Growing Too Large
A feature folder has more than 6–8 files; handler has 200+ lines
- Split into smaller features — separate command and query
- If handler coordinates multiple steps, consider domain events
- Move non-feature-specific domain logic to
Common/
Circular Dependency Between Features
Feature A imports from Feature B, Feature B imports from Feature A
- Extract shared types to
Common/Models/or the domain layer - Use domain events for communication
- If truly interdependent, they are likely one feature incorrectly split
Pipeline Behavior Order Causing Side Effects
Transaction commits before validation; logging misses exceptions
- Correct order: Logging → Validation → Transaction → (Handler)
- Behaviors execute in registration order (outermost first)
- Verify each behavior calls
next()and does not swallow exceptions
Integration with Other Skills
ef-migration-manager— When a slice requires schema changes, plan the migration alongside the feature. Define the entity first, then create the migration.tdd— Each slice is an ideal TDD unit. Write a failing handler test (RED), implement minimally (GREEN), refactor. Handler isolation makes testing straightforward without mocking half the application.tdd-agent— For autonomous vertical slice development: scaffold the folder, write handler tests RED, implement GREEN, refactor.
Reference Files
- Feature Folder Patterns — Folder layouts, request/response records, handler classes, validators, FreeMediator registration
- Pipeline Behaviors — Behavior implementations for validation, logging, transactions, caching
- Vertical Slice Testing — Testing patterns for handlers, validators, endpoints using xUnit and FluentAssertions
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

