speculative-decoding
Skill1 starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub
Accelerate LLM inference using speculative decoding, Medusa multiple heads, and lookahead decoding techniques. Use when optimizing inference speed (1.5-3.6× speedup), reducing latency for real-time applications, or deploying models with limited compute. Covers draft models, tree-based attention, Jacobi iteration, parallel token generation, and production deployment strategies.
- Installs packages
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- OpenLAIR/dr-clawword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- NVIDIA/Model-Optimizertheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- NVIDIA/TensorRT-Model-Optimizertheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- Clay-HHK/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Mar 5, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- OpenLAIR/dr-claw★ 1.2k100% same
- Clay-HHK/claude-skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- NVIDIA/TensorRT-Model-Optimizer★ 5.6ksame name
- NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer★ 5.6ksame name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository97 other files it gives its agents.
- autoresearchSkill
- academic-plottingSkill
- huggingface-accelerateSkill
- evolving-ai-agentsSkill
- audiocraft-audio-generationSkill
- autogpt-agentsSkill
- awq-quantizationSkill
- axolotlSkill
- evaluating-code-modelsSkill
- quantizing-models-bitsandbytesSkill
- blip-2-vision-languageSkill
- brainstorming-research-ideasSkill
- chromaSkill
- clipSkill
- ara-compilerSkill
- constitutional-aiSkill
- evaluating-cosmos-policySkill
- creative-thinking-for-researchSkill
- crewai-multi-agentSkill
- deepspeedSkill
- dspySkill
- faissSkill
- optimizing-attention-flashSkill
- gguf-quantizationSkill
- gptqSkill
- grpo-rl-trainingSkill
- guidanceSkill
- hqq-quantizationSkill
- huggingface-tokenizersSkill
- instructorSkill
- knowledge-distillationSkill
- lambda-labs-gpu-cloudSkill
- langchainSkill
- langsmith-observabilitySkill
- implementing-llms-litgptSkill
- llama-cppSkill
- llama-factorySkill
- llamaguardSkill
- llamaindexSkill
- llavaSkill
- evaluating-llms-harnessSkill
- long-contextSkill
- mamba-architectureSkill
- training-llms-megatronSkill
- miles-rl-trainingSkill
- mlflowSkill
- ml-paper-writingSkill
- ml-training-recipesSkill
- modal-serverless-gpuSkill
- model-mergingSkill
- model-pruningSkill
- moe-trainingSkill
- nanogptSkill
- nemo-curatorSkill
- nemo-evaluator-sdkSkill
- nemo-guardrailsSkill
- nnsight-remote-interpretabilitySkill
- fine-tuning-serving-openpiSkill
- openrlhf-trainingSkill
- fine-tuning-openvla-oftSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use Speculative Decoding when you need to:
- Distinctive: line 147
Idea: Use small draft model to generate candidates, large target model to verify in parallel.
- Distinctive: line 188
Innovation: Add multiple prediction heads to existing model, predict future tokens without separate draft model.
- Distinctive: line 220
No separate draft model needed
- Distinctive: line 242
Verification Branch: Verify promising n-grams
- Distinctive: line 275
No draft model or training needed
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Speculative Decoding: Accelerating LLM Inference
When to Use This Skill
Use Speculative Decoding when you need to:
- Speed up inference by 1.5-3.6× without quality loss
- Reduce latency for real-time applications (chatbots, code generation)
- Optimize throughput for high-volume serving
- Deploy efficiently on limited hardware
- Generate faster without changing model architecture
Key Techniques: Draft model speculative decoding, Medusa (multiple heads), Lookahead Decoding (Jacobi iteration)
Papers: Medusa (arXiv 2401.10774), Lookahead Decoding (ICML 2024), Speculative Decoding Survey (ACL 2024)
Installation
# Standard speculative decoding (transformers)
pip install transformers accelerate
# Medusa (multiple decoding heads)
git clone https://github.com/FasterDecoding/Medusa
cd Medusa
pip install -e .
# Lookahead Decoding
git clone https://github.com/hao-ai-lab/LookaheadDecoding
cd LookaheadDecoding
pip install -e .
# Optional: vLLM with speculative decoding
pip install vllmQuick Start
Basic Speculative Decoding (Draft Model)
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
# Load target model (large, slow)
target_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"meta-llama/Llama-2-70b-hf",
device_map="auto",
torch_dtype=torch.float16
)
# Load draft model (small, fast)
draft_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
device_map="auto",
torch_dtype=torch.float16
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("meta-llama/Llama-2-70b-hf")
# Generate with speculative decoding
prompt = "Explain quantum computing in simple terms:"
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")
# Transformers 4.36+ supports assisted generation
outputs = target_model.generate(
**inputs,
assistant_model=draft_model, # Enable speculative decoding
max_new_tokens=256,
do_sample=True,
temperature=0.7,
)
response = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
print(response)Medusa (Multiple Decoding Heads)
from medusa.model.medusa_model import MedusaModel
# Load Medusa-enhanced model
model = MedusaModel.from_pretrained(
"FasterDecoding/medusa-vicuna-7b-v1.3", # Pre-trained with Medusa heads
torch_dtype=torch.float16,
device_map="auto"
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("FasterDecoding/medusa-vicuna-7b-v1.3")
# Generate with Medusa (2-3× speedup)
prompt = "Write a Python function to calculate fibonacci numbers:"
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")
outputs = model.medusa_generate(
**inputs,
max_new_tokens=256,
temperature=0.7,
posterior_threshold=0.09, # Acceptance threshold
posterior_alpha=0.3, # Tree construction parameter
)
response = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)Lookahead Decoding (Jacobi Iteration)
from lookahead.lookahead_decoding import LookaheadDecoding
# Load model
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
torch_dtype=torch.float16,
device_map="auto"
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf")
# Initialize lookahead decoding
lookahead = LookaheadDecoding(
model=model,
tokenizer=tokenizer,
window_size=15, # Lookahead window (W)
ngram_size=5, # N-gram size (N)
guess_size=5 # Number of parallel guesses
)
# Generate (1.5-2.3× speedup)
prompt = "Implement quicksort in Python:"
output = lookahead.generate(prompt, max_new_tokens=256)
print(output)Core Concepts
1. Speculative Decoding (Draft Model)
Idea: Use small draft model to generate candidates, large target model to verify in parallel.
Algorithm:
- Draft model generates K tokens speculatively
- Target model evaluates all K tokens in parallel (single forward pass)
- Accept tokens where draft and target agree
- Reject first disagreement, continue from there
def speculative_decode(target_model, draft_model, prompt, K=4):
"""Speculative decoding algorithm."""
# 1. Generate K draft tokens
draft_tokens = draft_model.generate(prompt, max_new_tokens=K)
# 2. Target model evaluates all K tokens in one forward pass
target_logits = target_model(draft_tokens) # Parallel!
# 3. Accept/reject based on probability match
accepted = []
for i in range(K):
p_draft = softmax(draft_model.logits[i])
p_target = softmax(target_logits[i])
# Acceptance probability
if random.random() < min(1, p_target[draft_tokens[i]] / p_draft[draft_tokens[i]]):
accepted.append(draft_tokens[i])
else:
break # Reject, resample from target
return acceptedPerformance:
- Speedup: 1.5-2× with good draft model
- Zero quality loss (mathematically equivalent to target model)
- Best when draft model is 5-10× smaller than target
2. Medusa (Multiple Decoding Heads)
Source: arXiv 2401.10774 (2024)
Innovation: Add multiple prediction heads to existing model, predict future tokens without separate draft model.
Architecture:
Input → Base LLM (frozen) → Hidden State
├→ Head 1 (predicts token t+1)
├→ Head 2 (predicts token t+2)
├→ Head 3 (predicts token t+3)
└→ Head 4 (predicts token t+4)Training:
- Medusa-1: Freeze base LLM, train only heads
- 2.2× speedup, lossless
- Medusa-2: Fine-tune base LLM + heads together
- 2.3-3.6× speedup, better quality
Tree-based Attention:
# Medusa constructs tree of candidates
# Example: Predict 2 steps ahead with top-2 per step
# Root
# / \
# T1a T1b (Step 1: 2 candidates)
# / \ / \
# T2a T2b T2c T2d (Step 2: 4 candidates total)
# Single forward pass evaluates entire tree!Advantages:
- No separate draft model needed
- Minimal training (only heads)
- Compatible with any LLM
3. Lookahead Decoding (Jacobi Iteration)
Source: ICML 2024
Core idea: Reformulate autoregressive decoding as solving system of equations, solve in parallel using Jacobi iteration.
Mathematical formulation:
Traditional: y_t = f(x, y_1, ..., y_{t-1}) (sequential)
Jacobi: y_t^{(k+1)} = f(x, y_1^{(k)}, ..., y_{t-1}^{(k)}) (parallel)Two branches:
- Lookahead Branch: Generate n-grams in parallel
- Window size W: How many steps to look ahead
- N-gram size N: How many past tokens to use
- Verification Branch: Verify promising n-grams
- Match n-grams with generated tokens
- Accept if first token matches
class LookaheadDecoding:
def __init__(self, model, window_size=15, ngram_size=5):
self.model = model
self.W = window_size # Lookahead window
self.N = ngram_size # N-gram size
def generate_step(self, tokens):
# Lookahead branch: Generate W × N candidates
candidates = {}
for w in range(1, self.W + 1):
for n in range(1, self.N + 1):
# Generate n-gram starting at position w
ngram = self.generate_ngram(tokens, start=w, length=n)
candidates[(w, n)] = ngram
# Verification branch: Find matching n-grams
verified = []
for ngram in candidates.values():
if ngram[0] == tokens[-1]: # First token matches last input
if self.verify(tokens, ngram):
verified.append(ngram)
# Accept longest verified n-gram
return max(verified, key=len) if verified else [self.model.generate_next(tokens)]Performance:
- Speedup: 1.5-2.3× (up to 3.6× for code generation)
- No draft model or training needed
- Works out-of-the-box with any model
Method Comparison
| Method | Speedup | Training Needed | Draft Model | Quality Loss |
| Draft Model Speculative | 1.5-2× | No | Yes (external) | None |
| Medusa | 2-3.6× | Minimal (heads only) | No (built-in heads) | None |
| Lookahead | 1.5-2.3× | None | No | None |
| Naive Batching | 1.2-1.5× | No | No | None |
Advanced Patterns
Training Medusa Heads
from medusa.model.medusa_model import MedusaModel
from medusa.model.kv_cache import initialize_past_key_values
import torch.nn as nn
# 1. Load base model
base_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"lmsys/vicuna-7b-v1.3",
torch_dtype=torch.float16
)
# 2. Add Medusa heads
num_heads = 4
medusa_heads = nn.ModuleList([
nn.Linear(base_model.config.hidden_size, base_model.config.vocab_size, bias=False)
for _ in range(num_heads)
])
# 3. Training loop (freeze base model for Medusa-1)
for param in base_model.parameters():
param.requires_grad = False # Freeze base
optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(medusa_heads.parameters(), lr=1e-3)
for batch in dataloader:
# Forward pass
hidden_states = base_model(**batch, output_hidden_states=True).hidden_states[-1]
# Predict future tokens with each head
loss = 0
for i, head in enumerate(medusa_heads):
logits = head(hidden_states)
# Target: tokens shifted by (i+1) positions
target = batch['input_ids'][:, i+1:]
loss += F.cross_entropy(logits[:, :-i-1], target)
# Backward
optimizer.zero_grad()
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()Hybrid: Speculative + Medusa
# Use Medusa as draft model for speculative decoding
draft_medusa = MedusaModel.from_pretrained("medusa-vicuna-7b")
target_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("vicuna-33b")
# Draft generates multiple candidates with Medusa
draft_tokens = draft_medusa.medusa_generate(prompt, max_new_tokens=5)
# Target verifies in single forward pass
outputs = target_model.generate(
prompt,
assistant_model=draft_medusa, # Use Medusa as draft
max_new_tokens=256
)
# Combines benefits: Medusa speed + large model qualityOptimal Draft Model Selection
def select_draft_model(target_model_size, target):
"""Select optimal draft model for speculative decoding."""
# Rule: Draft should be 5-10× smaller
if target_model_size == "70B":
return "7B" # 10× smaller
elif target_model_size == "33B":
return "7B" # 5× smaller
elif target_model_size == "13B":
return "1B" # 13× smaller
else:
return None # Target too small, use Medusa/Lookahead instead
# Example
draft = select_draft_model("70B", target_model)
# Returns "7B" → Use Llama-2-7b as draft for Llama-2-70bBest Practices
1. Choose the Right Method
# New deployment → Medusa (best overall speedup, no draft model)
if deploying_new_model:
use_method = "Medusa"
# Existing deployment with small model available → Draft speculative
elif have_small_version_of_model:
use_method = "Draft Model Speculative"
# Want zero training/setup → Lookahead
elif want_plug_and_play:
use_method = "Lookahead Decoding"2. Hyperparameter Tuning
Draft Model Speculative:
# K = number of speculative tokens
K = 4 # Good default
K = 2 # Conservative (higher acceptance)
K = 8 # Aggressive (lower acceptance, but more when accepted)
# Rule: Larger K → more speedup IF draft model is goodMedusa:
# Posterior threshold (acceptance confidence)
posterior_threshold = 0.09 # Standard (from paper)
posterior_threshold = 0.05 # More conservative (slower, higher quality)
posterior_threshold = 0.15 # More aggressive (faster, may degrade quality)
# Tree depth (how many steps ahead)
medusa_choices = [[0], [0, 0], [0, 1], [0, 0, 0]] # Depth 3 (standard)Lookahead:
# Window size W (lookahead distance)
# N-gram size N (context for generation)
# 7B model (more resources)
W, N = 15, 5
# 13B model (moderate)
W, N = 10, 5
# 33B+ model (limited resources)
W, N = 7, 53. Production Deployment
# vLLM with speculative decoding
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
# Initialize with draft model
llm = LLM(
model="meta-llama/Llama-2-70b-hf",
speculative_model="meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf", # Draft model
num_speculative_tokens=5,
use_v2_block_manager=True,
)
# Generate
prompts = ["Tell me about AI:", "Explain quantum physics:"]
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.7, max_tokens=256)
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
for output in outputs:
print(output.outputs[0].text)Resources
- Medusa Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10774
- Medusa GitHub: https://github.com/FasterDecoding/Medusa
- Lookahead Decoding (ICML 2024): https://lmsys.org/blog/2023-11-21-lookahead-decoding/
- Lookahead GitHub: https://github.com/hao-ai-lab/LookaheadDecoding
- Speculative Decoding Survey (ACL 2024): https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.456.pdf
- Comprehensive Survey: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07851
See Also
references/draft_model.md- Draft model selection and trainingreferences/medusa.md- Medusa architecture and trainingreferences/lookahead.md- Lookahead decoding implementation details
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

