model-pruning
Skill1 starsChanged 55 days agoMITView on GitHub
Reduce LLM size and accelerate inference using pruning techniques like Wanda and SparseGPT. Use when compressing models without retraining, achieving 50% sparsity with minimal accuracy loss, or enabling faster inference on hardware accelerators. Covers unstructured pruning, structured pruning, N:M sparsity, magnitude pruning, and one-shot methods.
- Installs packages
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- OpenLAIR/dr-clawword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Clay-HHK/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Mar 5, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- OpenLAIR/dr-claw★ 1.2k100% same
- Clay-HHK/claude-skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository97 other files it gives its agents.
- autoresearchSkill
- academic-plottingSkill
- huggingface-accelerateSkill
- evolving-ai-agentsSkill
- audiocraft-audio-generationSkill
- autogpt-agentsSkill
- awq-quantizationSkill
- axolotlSkill
- evaluating-code-modelsSkill
- quantizing-models-bitsandbytesSkill
- blip-2-vision-languageSkill
- brainstorming-research-ideasSkill
- chromaSkill
- clipSkill
- ara-compilerSkill
- constitutional-aiSkill
- evaluating-cosmos-policySkill
- creative-thinking-for-researchSkill
- crewai-multi-agentSkill
- deepspeedSkill
- dspySkill
- faissSkill
- optimizing-attention-flashSkill
- gguf-quantizationSkill
- gptqSkill
- grpo-rl-trainingSkill
- guidanceSkill
- hqq-quantizationSkill
- huggingface-tokenizersSkill
- instructorSkill
- knowledge-distillationSkill
- lambda-labs-gpu-cloudSkill
- langchainSkill
- langsmith-observabilitySkill
- implementing-llms-litgptSkill
- llama-cppSkill
- llama-factorySkill
- llamaguardSkill
- llamaindexSkill
- llavaSkill
- evaluating-llms-harnessSkill
- long-contextSkill
- mamba-architectureSkill
- training-llms-megatronSkill
- miles-rl-trainingSkill
- mlflowSkill
- ml-paper-writingSkill
- ml-training-recipesSkill
- modal-serverless-gpuSkill
- model-mergingSkill
- moe-trainingSkill
- nanogptSkill
- nemo-curatorSkill
- nemo-evaluator-sdkSkill
- nemo-guardrailsSkill
- nnsight-remote-interpretabilitySkill
- fine-tuning-serving-openpiSkill
- openrlhf-trainingSkill
- fine-tuning-openvla-oftSkill
- outlinesSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use Model Pruning when you need to:
- Distinctive: line 231
No hardware speedup (irregular sparsity)
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Model Pruning: Compressing LLMs
When to Use This Skill
Use Model Pruning when you need to:
- Reduce model size by 40-60% with <1% accuracy loss
- Accelerate inference using hardware-friendly sparsity (2-4× speedup)
- Deploy on constrained hardware (mobile, edge devices)
- Compress without retraining using one-shot methods
- Enable efficient serving with reduced memory footprint
Key Techniques: Wanda (weights × activations), SparseGPT (second-order), structured pruning, N:M sparsity
Papers: Wanda ICLR 2024 (arXiv 2306.11695), SparseGPT (arXiv 2301.00774)
Installation
# Wanda implementation
git clone https://github.com/locuslab/wanda
cd wanda
pip install -r requirements.txt
# Optional: SparseGPT
git clone https://github.com/IST-DASLab/sparsegpt
cd sparsegpt
pip install -e .
# Dependencies
pip install torch transformers accelerateQuick Start
Wanda Pruning (One-Shot, No Retraining)
Source: ICLR 2024 (arXiv 2306.11695)
import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
# Load model
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
torch_dtype=torch.float16,
device_map="cuda"
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf")
# Calibration data (small dataset for activation statistics)
calib_data = [
"The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.",
"Machine learning is transforming the world.",
"Artificial intelligence powers modern applications.",
]
# Wanda pruning function
def wanda_prune(model, calib_data, sparsity=0.5):
"""
Wanda: Prune by weight magnitude × input activation.
Args:
sparsity: Fraction of weights to prune (0.5 = 50%)
"""
# 1. Collect activation statistics
activations = {}
def hook_fn(name):
def hook(module, input, output):
# Store input activation norms
activations[name] = input[0].detach().abs().mean(dim=0)
return hook
# Register hooks for all linear layers
hooks = []
for name, module in model.named_modules():
if isinstance(module, torch.nn.Linear):
hooks.append(module.register_forward_hook(hook_fn(name)))
# Run calibration data
model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
for text in calib_data:
inputs = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
model(**inputs)
# Remove hooks
for hook in hooks:
hook.remove()
# 2. Prune weights based on |weight| × activation
for name, module in model.named_modules():
if isinstance(module, torch.nn.Linear) and name in activations:
W = module.weight.data
act = activations[name]
# Compute importance: |weight| × activation
importance = W.abs() * act.unsqueeze(0)
# Flatten and find threshold
threshold = torch.quantile(importance.flatten(), sparsity)
# Create mask
mask = importance >= threshold
# Apply mask (prune)
W *= mask.float()
return model
# Apply Wanda pruning (50% sparsity, one-shot, no retraining)
pruned_model = wanda_prune(model, calib_data, sparsity=0.5)
# Save
pruned_model.save_pretrained("./llama-2-7b-wanda-50")SparseGPT (Second-Order Pruning)
Source: arXiv 2301.00774
from sparsegpt import SparseGPT
# Load model
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf")
# Initialize SparseGPT
pruner = SparseGPT(model)
# Calibration data
calib_data = load_calibration_data() # ~128 samples
# Prune (one-shot, layer-wise reconstruction)
pruned_model = pruner.prune(
calib_data=calib_data,
sparsity=0.5, # 50% sparsity
prunen=0, # Unstructured (0) or N:M structured
prunem=0,
percdamp=0.01, # Damping for Hessian inverse
)
# Results: Near-lossless pruning at 50% sparsityN:M Structured Pruning (Hardware Accelerator)
def nm_prune(weight, n=2, m=4):
"""
N:M pruning: Keep N weights per M consecutive weights.
Example: 2:4 = keep 2 out of every 4 weights.
Compatible with NVIDIA sparse tensor cores (2:4, 4:8).
"""
# Reshape weight into groups of M
shape = weight.shape
weight_flat = weight.flatten()
# Pad to multiple of M
pad_size = (m - weight_flat.numel() % m) % m
weight_padded = F.pad(weight_flat, (0, pad_size))
# Reshape into (num_groups, m)
weight_grouped = weight_padded.reshape(-1, m)
# Find top-N in each group
_, indices = torch.topk(weight_grouped.abs(), n, dim=-1)
# Create mask
mask = torch.zeros_like(weight_grouped)
mask.scatter_(1, indices, 1.0)
# Apply mask
weight_pruned = weight_grouped * mask
# Reshape back
weight_pruned = weight_pruned.flatten()[:weight_flat.numel()]
return weight_pruned.reshape(shape)
# Apply 2:4 sparsity (NVIDIA hardware)
for name, module in model.named_modules():
if isinstance(module, torch.nn.Linear):
module.weight.data = nm_prune(module.weight.data, n=2, m=4)
# 50% sparsity, 2× speedup on A100 with sparse tensor coresCore Concepts
1. Pruning Criteria
Magnitude Pruning (baseline):
# Prune weights with smallest absolute values
importance = weight.abs()
threshold = torch.quantile(importance, sparsity)
mask = importance >= thresholdWanda (weights × activations):
# Importance = |weight| × input_activation
importance = weight.abs() * activation
# Better than magnitude alone (considers usage)SparseGPT (second-order):
# Uses Hessian (second derivative) for importance
# More accurate but computationally expensive
importance = weight^2 / diag(Hessian)2. Structured vs Unstructured
Unstructured (fine-grained):
- Prune individual weights
- Higher quality (better accuracy)
- No hardware speedup (irregular sparsity)
Structured (coarse-grained):
- Prune entire neurons, heads, or layers
- Lower quality (more accuracy loss)
- Hardware speedup (regular sparsity)
Semi-structured (N:M):
- Best of both worlds
- 50% sparsity (2:4) → 2× speedup on NVIDIA GPUs
- Minimal accuracy loss
3. Sparsity Patterns
# Unstructured (random)
# [1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0]
# Pros: Flexible, high quality
# Cons: No speedup
# Structured (block)
# [1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0]
# Pros: Hardware friendly
# Cons: More accuracy loss
# N:M (semi-structured)
# [1, 0, 1, 0] [1, 1, 0, 0] (2:4 pattern)
# Pros: Hardware speedup + good quality
# Cons: Requires specific hardware (NVIDIA)Pruning Strategies
Strategy 1: Gradual Magnitude Pruning
def gradual_prune(model, initial_sparsity=0.0, final_sparsity=0.5, num_steps=100):
"""Gradually increase sparsity during training."""
for step in range(num_steps):
# Current sparsity
current_sparsity = initial_sparsity + (final_sparsity - initial_sparsity) * (step / num_steps)
# Prune at current sparsity
for module in model.modules():
if isinstance(module, torch.nn.Linear):
weight = module.weight.data
threshold = torch.quantile(weight.abs().flatten(), current_sparsity)
mask = weight.abs() >= threshold
weight *= mask.float()
# Train one step
train_step(model)
return modelStrategy 2: Layer-wise Pruning
def layer_wise_prune(model, sparsity_per_layer):
"""Different sparsity for different layers."""
# Early layers: Less pruning (more important)
# Late layers: More pruning (less critical)
sparsity_schedule = {
"layer.0": 0.3, # 30% sparsity
"layer.1": 0.4,
"layer.2": 0.5,
"layer.3": 0.6, # 60% sparsity
}
for name, module in model.named_modules():
if isinstance(module, torch.nn.Linear):
# Find layer index
for layer_name, sparsity in sparsity_schedule.items():
if layer_name in name:
# Prune at layer-specific sparsity
prune_layer(module, sparsity)
break
return modelStrategy 3: Iterative Pruning + Fine-tuning
def iterative_prune_finetune(model, target_sparsity=0.5, iterations=5):
"""Prune gradually with fine-tuning between iterations."""
current_sparsity = 0.0
sparsity_increment = target_sparsity / iterations
for i in range(iterations):
# Increase sparsity
current_sparsity += sparsity_increment
# Prune
prune_model(model, sparsity=current_sparsity)
# Fine-tune (recover accuracy)
fine_tune(model, epochs=2, lr=1e-5)
return model
# Results: Better accuracy than one-shot at high sparsityProduction Deployment
Complete Pruning Pipeline
from transformers import Trainer, TrainingArguments
def production_pruning_pipeline(
model_name="meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
target_sparsity=0.5,
method="wanda", # or "sparsegpt"
):
# 1. Load model
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name, torch_dtype=torch.float16)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
# 2. Load calibration data
calib_dataset = load_dataset("wikitext", "wikitext-2-raw-v1", split="train[:1000]")
# 3. Apply pruning
if method == "wanda":
pruned_model = wanda_prune(model, calib_dataset, sparsity=target_sparsity)
elif method == "sparsegpt":
pruner = SparseGPT(model)
pruned_model = pruner.prune(calib_dataset, sparsity=target_sparsity)
# 4. (Optional) Fine-tune to recover accuracy
training_args = TrainingArguments(
output_dir="./pruned-model",
num_train_epochs=1,
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
learning_rate=1e-5,
bf16=True,
)
trainer = Trainer(
model=pruned_model,
args=training_args,
train_dataset=finetune_dataset,
)
trainer.train()
# 5. Save
pruned_model.save_pretrained("./pruned-llama-7b-50")
tokenizer.save_pretrained("./pruned-llama-7b-50")
return pruned_model
# Usage
pruned_model = production_pruning_pipeline(
model_name="meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
target_sparsity=0.5,
method="wanda"
)Evaluation
from lm_eval import evaluator
# Evaluate pruned vs original model
original_results = evaluator.simple_evaluate(
model="hf",
model_args="pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf",
tasks=["arc_easy", "hellaswag", "winogrande"],
)
pruned_results = evaluator.simple_evaluate(
model="hf",
model_args="pretrained=./pruned-llama-7b-50",
tasks=["arc_easy", "hellaswag", "winogrande"],
)
# Compare
print(f"Original: {original_results['results']['arc_easy']['acc']:.3f}")
print(f"Pruned: {pruned_results['results']['arc_easy']['acc']:.3f}")
print(f"Degradation: {(original_results - pruned_results):.3f}")
# Typical results at 50% sparsity:
# - Wanda: <1% accuracy loss
# - SparseGPT: <0.5% accuracy loss
# - Magnitude: 2-3% accuracy lossBest Practices
1. Sparsity Selection
# Conservative (safe)
sparsity = 0.3 # 30%, <0.5% loss
# Balanced (recommended)
sparsity = 0.5 # 50%, ~1% loss
# Aggressive (risky)
sparsity = 0.7 # 70%, 2-5% loss
# Extreme (model-dependent)
sparsity = 0.9 # 90%, significant degradation2. Method Selection
# One-shot, no retraining → Wanda or SparseGPT
if no_retraining_budget:
use_method = "wanda" # Faster
# Best quality → SparseGPT
if need_best_quality:
use_method = "sparsegpt" # More accurate
# Hardware speedup → N:M structured
if need_speedup:
use_method = "nm_prune" # 2:4 or 4:83. Avoid Common Pitfalls
# ❌ Bad: Pruning without calibration data
prune_random(model) # No activation statistics
# ✅ Good: Use calibration data
prune_wanda(model, calib_data)
# ❌ Bad: Too high sparsity in one shot
prune(model, sparsity=0.9) # Massive accuracy loss
# ✅ Good: Gradual or iterative
iterative_prune(model, target=0.9, steps=10)Performance Comparison
Pruning methods at 50% sparsity (LLaMA-7B):
| Method | Accuracy Loss | Speed | Memory | Retraining Needed |
| Magnitude | -2.5% | 1.0× | -50% | No |
| Wanda | -0.8% | 1.0× | -50% | No |
| SparseGPT | -0.4% | 1.0× | -50% | No |
| N:M (2:4) | -1.0% | 2.0× | -50% | No |
| Structured | -3.0% | 2.0× | -50% | No |
Source: Wanda paper (ICLR 2024), SparseGPT paper
Resources
- Wanda Paper (ICLR 2024): https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11695
- Wanda GitHub: https://github.com/locuslab/wanda
- SparseGPT Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00774
- SparseGPT GitHub: https://github.com/IST-DASLab/sparsegpt
- NVIDIA Sparse Tensor Cores: https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/accelerating-inference-with-sparsity-using-ampere-and-tensorrt/
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

