evaluating-code-models
Skill1 starsChanged 55 days agoMITView on GitHub
Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.
- Installs packages
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- OpenLAIR/dr-clawword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Clay-HHK/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Mar 5, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- OpenLAIR/dr-claw★ 1.2k100% same
- Clay-HHK/claude-skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository97 other files it gives its agents.
- autoresearchSkill
- academic-plottingSkill
- huggingface-accelerateSkill
- evolving-ai-agentsSkill
- audiocraft-audio-generationSkill
- autogpt-agentsSkill
- awq-quantizationSkill
- axolotlSkill
- quantizing-models-bitsandbytesSkill
- blip-2-vision-languageSkill
- brainstorming-research-ideasSkill
- chromaSkill
- clipSkill
- ara-compilerSkill
- constitutional-aiSkill
- evaluating-cosmos-policySkill
- creative-thinking-for-researchSkill
- crewai-multi-agentSkill
- deepspeedSkill
- dspySkill
- faissSkill
- optimizing-attention-flashSkill
- gguf-quantizationSkill
- gptqSkill
- grpo-rl-trainingSkill
- guidanceSkill
- hqq-quantizationSkill
- huggingface-tokenizersSkill
- instructorSkill
- knowledge-distillationSkill
- lambda-labs-gpu-cloudSkill
- langchainSkill
- langsmith-observabilitySkill
- implementing-llms-litgptSkill
- llama-cppSkill
- llama-factorySkill
- llamaguardSkill
- llamaindexSkill
- llavaSkill
- evaluating-llms-harnessSkill
- long-contextSkill
- mamba-architectureSkill
- training-llms-megatronSkill
- miles-rl-trainingSkill
- mlflowSkill
- ml-paper-writingSkill
- ml-training-recipesSkill
- modal-serverless-gpuSkill
- model-mergingSkill
- model-pruningSkill
- moe-trainingSkill
- nanogptSkill
- nemo-curatorSkill
- nemo-evaluator-sdkSkill
- nemo-guardrailsSkill
- nnsight-remote-interpretabilitySkill
- fine-tuning-serving-openpiSkill
- openrlhf-trainingSkill
- fine-tuning-openvla-oftSkill
- outlinesSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 344
Use Docker for safe execution:
- Distinctive: line 355
Ensure proper instruction formatting:
- Distinctive: line 366
Use the dedicated Docker image:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
BigCode Evaluation Harness - Code Model Benchmarking
Quick Start
BigCode Evaluation Harness evaluates code generation models across 15+ benchmarks including HumanEval, MBPP, and MultiPL-E (18 languages).
Installation:
git clone https://github.com/bigcode-project/bigcode-evaluation-harness.git
cd bigcode-evaluation-harness
pip install -e .
accelerate configEvaluate on HumanEval:
accelerate launch main.py \
--model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
--tasks humaneval \
--max_length_generation 512 \
--temperature 0.2 \
--n_samples 20 \
--batch_size 10 \
--allow_code_execution \
--save_generationsView available tasks:
python -c "from bigcode_eval.tasks import ALL_TASKS; print(ALL_TASKS)"Common Workflows
Workflow 1: Standard Code Benchmark Evaluation
Evaluate model on core code benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP, HumanEval+).
Checklist:
Code Benchmark Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Choose benchmark suite
- [ ] Step 2: Configure model and generation
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation with code execution
- [ ] Step 4: Analyze pass@k resultsStep 1: Choose benchmark suite
Python code generation (most common):
- HumanEval: 164 handwritten problems, function completion
- HumanEval+: Same 164 problems with 80× more tests (stricter)
- MBPP: 500 crowd-sourced problems, entry-level difficulty
- MBPP+: 399 curated problems with 35× more tests
Multi-language (18 languages):
- MultiPL-E: HumanEval/MBPP translated to C++, Java, JavaScript, Go, Rust, etc.
Advanced:
- APPS: 10,000 problems (introductory/interview/competition)
- DS-1000: 1,000 data science problems across 7 libraries
Step 2: Configure model and generation
# Standard HuggingFace model
accelerate launch main.py \
--model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
--tasks humaneval \
--max_length_generation 512 \
--temperature 0.2 \
--do_sample True \
--n_samples 200 \
--batch_size 50 \
--allow_code_execution
# Quantized model (4-bit)
accelerate launch main.py \
--model codellama/CodeLlama-34b-hf \
--tasks humaneval \
--load_in_4bit \
--max_length_generation 512 \
--allow_code_execution
# Custom/private model
accelerate launch main.py \
--model /path/to/my-code-model \
--tasks humaneval \
--trust_remote_code \
--use_auth_token \
--allow_code_executionStep 3: Run evaluation
# Full evaluation with pass@k estimation (k=1,10,100)
accelerate launch main.py \
--model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
--tasks humaneval \
--temperature 0.8 \
--n_samples 200 \
--batch_size 50 \
--allow_code_execution \
--save_generations \
--metric_output_path results/starcoder2-humaneval.jsonStep 4: Analyze results
Results in results/starcoder2-humaneval.json:
{
"humaneval": {
"pass@1": 0.354,
"pass@10": 0.521,
"pass@100": 0.689
},
"config": {
"model": "bigcode/starcoder2-7b",
"temperature": 0.8,
"n_samples": 200
}
}Workflow 2: Multi-Language Evaluation (MultiPL-E)
Evaluate code generation across 18 programming languages.
Checklist:
Multi-Language Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Generate solutions (host machine)
- [ ] Step 2: Run evaluation in Docker (safe execution)
- [ ] Step 3: Compare across languagesStep 1: Generate solutions on host
# Generate without execution (safe)
accelerate launch main.py \
--model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
--tasks multiple-py,multiple-js,multiple-java,multiple-cpp \
--max_length_generation 650 \
--temperature 0.8 \
--n_samples 50 \
--batch_size 50 \
--generation_only \
--save_generations \
--save_generations_path generations_multi.jsonStep 2: Evaluate in Docker container
# Pull the MultiPL-E Docker image
docker pull ghcr.io/bigcode-project/evaluation-harness-multiple
# Run evaluation inside container
docker run -v $(pwd)/generations_multi.json:/app/generations.json:ro \
-it evaluation-harness-multiple python3 main.py \
--model bigcode/starcoder2-7b \
--tasks multiple-py,multiple-js,multiple-java,multiple-cpp \
--load_generations_path /app/generations.json \
--allow_code_execution \
--n_samples 50Supported languages: Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, TypeScript, C#, PHP, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, Scala, Perl, Julia, Lua, R, Racket
Workflow 3: Instruction-Tuned Model Evaluation
Evaluate chat/instruction models with proper formatting.
Checklist:
Instruction Model Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Use instruction-tuned tasks
- [ ] Step 2: Configure instruction tokens
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluationStep 1: Choose instruction tasks
- instruct-humaneval: HumanEval with instruction prompts
- humanevalsynthesize-{lang}: HumanEvalPack synthesis tasks
Step 2: Configure instruction tokens
# For models with chat templates (e.g., CodeLlama-Instruct)
accelerate launch main.py \
--model codellama/CodeLlama-7b-Instruct-hf \
--tasks instruct-humaneval \
--instruction_tokens "<s>[INST],</s>,[/INST]" \
--max_length_generation 512 \
--allow_code_executionStep 3: HumanEvalPack for instruction models
# Test code synthesis across 6 languages
accelerate launch main.py \
--model codellama/CodeLlama-7b-Instruct-hf \
--tasks humanevalsynthesize-python,humanevalsynthesize-js \
--prompt instruct \
--max_length_generation 512 \
--allow_code_executionWorkflow 4: Compare Multiple Models
Benchmark suite for model comparison.
Step 1: Create evaluation script
#!/bin/bash
# eval_models.sh
MODELS=(
"bigcode/starcoder2-7b"
"codellama/CodeLlama-7b-hf"
"deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder-6.7b-base"
)
TASKS="humaneval,mbpp"
for model in "${MODELS[@]}"; do
model_name=$(echo $model | tr '/' '-')
echo "Evaluating $model"
accelerate launch main.py \
--model $model \
--tasks $TASKS \
--temperature 0.2 \
--n_samples 20 \
--batch_size 20 \
--allow_code_execution \
--metric_output_path results/${model_name}.json
doneStep 2: Generate comparison table
import json
import pandas as pd
models = ["bigcode-starcoder2-7b", "codellama-CodeLlama-7b-hf", "deepseek-ai-deepseek-coder-6.7b-base"]
results = []
for model in models:
with open(f"results/{model}.json") as f:
data = json.load(f)
results.append({
"Model": model,
"HumanEval pass@1": f"{data['humaneval']['pass@1']:.3f}",
"MBPP pass@1": f"{data['mbpp']['pass@1']:.3f}"
})
df = pd.DataFrame(results)
print(df.to_markdown(index=False))When to Use vs Alternatives
Use BigCode Evaluation Harness when:
- Evaluating code generation models specifically
- Need multi-language evaluation (18 languages via MultiPL-E)
- Testing functional correctness with unit tests (pass@k)
- Benchmarking for BigCode/HuggingFace leaderboards
- Evaluating fill-in-the-middle (FIM) capabilities
Use alternatives instead:
- lm-evaluation-harness: General LLM benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HellaSwag)
- EvalPlus: Stricter HumanEval+/MBPP+ with more test cases
- SWE-bench: Real-world GitHub issue resolution
- LiveCodeBench: Contamination-free, continuously updated problems
- CodeXGLUE: Code understanding tasks (clone detection, defect prediction)
Supported Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Problems | Languages | Metric | Use Case |
| HumanEval | 164 | Python | pass@k | Standard code completion |
| HumanEval+ | 164 | Python | pass@k | Stricter evaluation (80× tests) |
| MBPP | 500 | Python | pass@k | Entry-level problems |
| MBPP+ | 399 | Python | pass@k | Stricter evaluation (35× tests) |
| MultiPL-E | 164×18 | 18 languages | pass@k | Multi-language evaluation |
| APPS | 10,000 | Python | pass@k | Competition-level |
| DS-1000 | 1,000 | Python | pass@k | Data science (pandas, numpy, etc.) |
| HumanEvalPack | 164×3×6 | 6 languages | pass@k | Synthesis/fix/explain |
| Mercury | 1,889 | Python | Efficiency | Computational efficiency |
Common Issues
Issue: Different results than reported in papers
Check these factors:
# 1. Verify n_samples (need 200 for accurate pass@k)
--n_samples 200
# 2. Check temperature (0.2 for greedy-ish, 0.8 for sampling)
--temperature 0.8
# 3. Verify task name matches exactly
--tasks humaneval # Not "human_eval" or "HumanEval"
# 4. Check max_length_generation
--max_length_generation 512 # Increase for longer problemsIssue: CUDA out of memory
# Use quantization
--load_in_8bit
# OR
--load_in_4bit
# Reduce batch size
--batch_size 1
# Set memory limit
--max_memory_per_gpu "20GiB"Issue: Code execution hangs or times out
Use Docker for safe execution:
# Generate on host (no execution)
--generation_only --save_generations
# Evaluate in Docker
docker run ... --allow_code_execution --load_generations_path ...Issue: Low scores on instruction models
Ensure proper instruction formatting:
# Use instruction-specific tasks
--tasks instruct-humaneval
# Set instruction tokens for your model
--instruction_tokens "<s>[INST],</s>,[/INST]"Issue: MultiPL-E language failures
Use the dedicated Docker image:
docker pull ghcr.io/bigcode-project/evaluation-harness-multipleCommand Reference
| Argument | Default | Description |
--model | - | HuggingFace model ID or local path |
--tasks | - | Comma-separated task names |
--n_samples | 1 | Samples per problem (200 for pass@k) |
--temperature | 0.2 | Sampling temperature |
--max_length_generation | 512 | Max tokens (prompt + generation) |
--batch_size | 1 | Batch size per GPU |
--allow_code_execution | False | Enable code execution (required) |
--generation_only | False | Generate without evaluation |
--load_generations_path | - | Load pre-generated solutions |
--save_generations | False | Save generated code |
--metric_output_path | results.json | Output file for metrics |
--load_in_8bit | False | 8-bit quantization |
--load_in_4bit | False | 4-bit quantization |
--trust_remote_code | False | Allow custom model code |
--precision | fp32 | Model precision (fp32/fp16/bf16) |
Hardware Requirements
| Model Size | VRAM (fp16) | VRAM (4-bit) | Time (HumanEval, n=200) |
| 7B | 14GB | 6GB | ~30 min (A100) |
| 13B | 26GB | 10GB | ~1 hour (A100) |
| 34B | 68GB | 20GB | ~2 hours (A100) |
Resources
- GitHub: https://github.com/bigcode-project/bigcode-evaluation-harness
- Documentation: https://github.com/bigcode-project/bigcode-evaluation-harness/tree/main/docs
- BigCode Leaderboard: https://huggingface.co/spaces/bigcode/bigcode-models-leaderboard
- HumanEval Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/openai/openai_humaneval
- MultiPL-E: https://github.com/nuprl/MultiPL-E
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

