execution
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the specialist that requested a T3 operation or COMMAND_SET is resumed after the user granted it
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jircdev/crew-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ceeinbeta/pm-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- CrowdStrike/fusion-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- mcveloria/pm-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- nuncaeslupus/literary-critictheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- dynos-fit/dynos-worktheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- Towow-ai/Flowness★ 107same name
- CrowdStrike/fusion-skills★ 29same name
- ceeinbeta/pm-skills★ 3same name
- mcveloria/pm-skills★ 3same name
- dynos-fit/dynos-work★ 2same name
- SoFarSoGoodya/mathmodel-weave★ 2same name
- jircdev/crew-plugin★ 1same name
- luisabwk/kraken★ 1same name
- Leostruka/devin-bundle★ 0same name
- nuncaeslupus/literary-critic★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-contract-handoffSkill
- agent-creationSkill
- agent-protocolSkill
- agent-responseSkill
- blog-writingSkill
- brief-specSkill
- cli-loginSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- code-standardsSkill
- command-executionSkill
- deck-builderSkill
- dispatchSkill
- fast-queriesSkill
- gaia-auditSkill
- gaia-checkSkill
- gaia-patternsSkill
- gaia-plannerSkill
- gaia-releaseSkill
- gaia-researchSkill
- gaia-verifySkill
- ghostwritingSkill
- git-conventionsSkill
- gmail-policySkill
- gmail-triageSkill
- gws-setupSkill
- human-registerSkill
- investigationSkill
- memorySkill
- orchestrator-present-approvalSkill
- pending-approvalsSkill
- remindersSkill
- security-tiersSkill
- session-channelsSkill
- session-reflectionSkill
- skill-creationSkill
- subagent-request-approvalSkill
- technical-explanationSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- ticket-writingSkill
- verification-oracleSkill
- verification-rubricSkill
- visual-verifySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 20
Read the approval with gaia approvals show <approval_id>: its state, its commands in order, their directory, and how much of the grant's …
- Very specific: line 23
Run exactly one command per tool call using command-execution, byte for byte as requested, in its sealed directory.
- Distinctive: line 33
After every result, checkpoint the exact command, index and exit status.
- Distinctive: line 53
After successful mutations, verify desired state with separate read-only checks.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Approved Execution
The approved work runs in the specialist that requested it, resumed by the orchestrator; the signature belongs to that agent and session. Approval does not turn the orchestrator into an executor and does not broaden scope.
Source boundary
For Gaia components, edit only the canonical gaia/ source tree. Never write,
copy, generate, or stage anything under .claude/; installation propagates
source changes. The same prohibition applies to fixtures and bulk operations.
Ordered execution
- Read the approval with
gaia approvals show <approval_id>: its state, its commands in order, their directory, and how much of the grant's window is left. - Run exactly one command per tool call using
command-execution, byte for byte as requested, in its sealed directory. When that directory is not the one your Bash runs in, run exactlycd <sealed directory> && <sealed command>, the only compound accepted. Never join commands otherwise, skip an index, substitute an equivalent spelling, or add an unapproved command. A still-pending approval is not a reason to stop: attempt the command. If Gaia refuses it because the user has not answered yet, end the turn withAPPROVAL_REQUESTand the same approval id; the orchestrator asks the user and resumes you after the answer. This is the same in Claude Code and OpenCode, and nothing is asked in your session. - After every result, checkpoint the exact command, index and exit status.
- A command that exits with a code its request declared with
--expect-exithas succeeded for the set: continue with the next index. Only a declaration made when the set was requested counts; you cannot declare one now. Any other failure stops the set; applycommand-execution's COMMAND_SET fail-fast rule, then useagent-protocolto reconcile the result for its consumer. An unsigned step of the set (gaia approvals showmarks it"signed": false) runs in its position like any other command of yours: it holds no index, so it neither spends nor advances the signature. - A call the host refused before running it (Claude Code's
Permission to use Bash ... has been denied) spends nothing: the item keeps its index and the single-command signature stays usable. Retry the same sealed bytes once, as a new call; if the host refuses again, stop and report the refusal with the approval id instead of requesting anew. A call that never reports back is recorded as no result, not as a failure, and does not advance the set. Read its state before deciding anything, and request anything still needed as a new request. A single-command signature whose command exited non-zero is given back once, while its window lasts: retry the same sealed bytes from the same directory, and after a second failure investigate and request anew. - After successful mutations, verify desired state with separate read-only checks. Success exit codes alone are insufficient.
- Checkpoint verification and emit
NEEDS_VERIFICATIONfor a plan-task-bound producer; only an eligible unbound turn/verifier may reachCOMPLETE.
This skill sequences the approved work; it does not duplicate the failure rule or the consumer reconciliation owned by those two skills.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

