agentleFS
marcus-at-localhostmarcus-at-localhost/market-context-kit/skills/brand/SKILL.md

brand

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user asks about brand voice, tone of voice, messaging consistency, or wants brand voice guidelines documented from an existing site.

63 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use content, stop-slop and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Rayan55050Skill

    content

    Создание контента: посты, статьи, тексты

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • hardikpandyaSkill

    stop-slop

    Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    image-to-code

    Implement a selected image, screenshot, mockup, or Image Gen reference as a faithful, responsive frontend.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • AnasX7Skill

    brandkit

    Premium brand-kit image generation skill for creating high-end brand-guidelines boards, logo systems, identity decks, and visual-world presentations. Trained for minimalist, cinematic, editorial, dark-tech, luxury, cultural, security, gaming, developer-tool, and consumer-app brand systems. Optimized for intentional logo concepting, refined composition, sparse typography, strong symbolic meaning, premium mockups, art-directed imagery, and flexible grid layouts.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • AnasX7Skill

    minimalist-ui

    Clean editorial-style interfaces. Warm monochrome palette, typographic contrast, flat bento grids, muted pastels. No gradients, no heavy shadows.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • HK-hubSkill

    stitch-design-taste

    Semantic Design System Skill for Google Stitch. Generates agent-friendly DESIGN.md files that enforce premium, anti-generic UI standards — strict typography, calibrated color, asymmetric layouts, perpetual micro-motion, and hardware-accelerated performance.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +1 more from AnasX7

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/grounding.md and load any _grounding/ folder it finds.

    line 13
  2. Very specific:

    Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/output-location.md.

    line 17
  3. Very specific:

    Use python3 on macOS/Linux.

    line 23
  4. Very specific:

    Use browser tools or the analyze_page.py script to access web content.

    line 66
  5. Distinctive:

    Document the brand's messaging from most distilled to most expanded:

    line 292
  6. Distinctive:

    Create the comprehensive Do's and Don'ts guide:

    line 326
  7. Very specific:

    Write the exact output_path resolved in Phase 0 with:

    line 386
  8. Distinctive:

    Always provide EVIDENCE for every assessment.

    line 522
  9. Distinctive:

    If the brand's voice is inconsistent across channels, frame it as an opportunity to strengthen their brand, not as a failure.

    line 526
  10. Very specific:

    If MARKETKIT - COMPETITOR-REPORT - <domain>.md exists in the Phase 0 audit_dir (same exact domain scope), use that data for the competitor …

    line 527

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Brand Voice Analysis and Guidelines Generation

Phase 0: Grounding

Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/grounding.md and load any _grounding/ folder it finds. Client documentation outranks every default in this skill, and any claim rules it contains bind the output. Name the loaded files at the top of what you produce.

Resolve the business type via ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/business-context.md before assigning an archetype — the same voice reads as confident to one audience and unreliable to another.

Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/output-location.md. Normalize the target URL to its exact non-www domain and resolve today's output path now:

python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/resolve_audit_output.py" --purpose BRAND-VOICE --scope <domain> --extension md

Use python3 on macOS/Linux. Retain audit_dir (to check for a same-scope MARKETKIT - COMPETITOR-REPORT - <domain>.md) and the exact output_path for the final write.

Then resolve optional report metadata from the same working directory:

python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/resolve_report_metadata.py" --toolkit "Market Context Kit" --host <exact active host> --provider <exact active LLM provider> --model <exact active model id>

Never guess a runtime value. Handle the three outcomes exactly as ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/output-location.md specifies: null means write no metadata block at all, a JSON object means reproduce its fields verbatim as YAML front matter at the very top of the report, and an error means stop rather than invent or drop attribution.

Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/webfetch-artifacts.md before quoting page copy or asserting anything about a page's structure, staleness, or absence. Page text used as evidence must come from scripts/analyze_page.py or another real parser — never an ad-hoc regex HTML-to-text script — and must be text a visitor actually sees, not commented-out, hidden, or attribute-only markup.


Skill Purpose

Analyze a brand's voice, tone, and messaging across all available channels and generate a comprehensive brand voice guidelines document. This skill examines how a brand communicates, identifies patterns and inconsistencies, and produces actionable guidelines that any writer or marketer can follow to maintain brand consistency.

When to Use

  • User wants to understand or document a brand's voice
  • User needs brand voice guidelines for a team, freelancers, or agency
  • User wants to ensure consistency across marketing channels
  • User is rebranding or refining their brand identity
  • User wants to compare their brand voice to competitors
  • Triggered by /marketkit:brand <url> or /marketkit:brand

How to Execute

Step 1: Gather Source Material

To analyze a brand's voice, examine content from multiple sources. Prioritize in this order:

Primary Sources (must analyze):

  1. Homepage -- The most curated representation of the brand
  2. About page -- How the brand describes itself
  3. Product/service pages -- How they present their offerings

Secondary Sources (analyze if available): 4. Blog posts (at least 3-5 recent posts) 5. Social media profiles (bio, recent posts, engagement style) 6. Email newsletters (welcome email, recent sends) 7. Customer-facing copy (error messages, onboarding flows, help docs)

Tertiary Sources: 8. Job postings -- Reveals internal culture and values 9. Press releases -- Formal communication style 10. Ad copy -- Paid messaging approach 11. Video scripts or podcast transcripts -- Spoken brand voice

Use browser tools or the analyze_page.py script to access web content. For social media, check the website for social links and analyze the linked profiles.

Step 2: Voice Dimension Analysis

Map the brand's voice along four primary dimensions. Each dimension is a spectrum, not a binary.

Dimension 1: Formal <-----> Casual

Where does the brand fall on the formality spectrum?

SignalFormalCasual
ContractionsAvoids them ("do not", "cannot")Uses them freely ("don't", "can't")
Sentence structureComplex, longer sentencesShort, punchy sentences
VocabularyProfessional, industry-standardConversational, everyday words
Greetings"Dear valued customer""Hey there!"
PronounsThird person ("the company", "one")First/second person ("we", "you")
HumorRare or absentFrequent, natural
Slang/colloquialismsNeverOccasionally or frequently

Score: 1 (extremely formal) to 10 (extremely casual)

Evidence required: Quote 3-5 specific examples from the source material that support your rating.

Dimension 2: Serious <-----> Playful

How much levity does the brand inject into its communication?

SignalSeriousPlayful
ToneAuthoritative, measuredLight-hearted, fun
MetaphorsRare, conservativeCreative, unexpected
Exclamation marksRareFrequent
Emoji useNeverSometimes or often
Wordplay/punsNeverEnjoys them
Error messages"An error has occurred""Oops! Something went sideways"
Self-deprecationNeverOccasionally

Score: 1 (extremely serious) to 10 (extremely playful)

Dimension 3: Technical <-----> Simple

How much domain expertise does the brand assume in its audience?

SignalTechnicalSimple
JargonUses industry terms freelyAvoids or explains all jargon
AcronymsUses without definitionSpells out on first use
Detail levelIn-depth explanationsHigh-level overviews
Audience assumptionExpert audienceGeneral audience
Data/statisticsFrequent, detailedOccasional, simplified
ExamplesComplex, domain-specificSimple, relatable analogies

Score: 1 (extremely technical) to 10 (extremely simple)

Dimension 4: Reserved <-----> Bold

How much personality and confidence does the brand project?

SignalReservedBold
ClaimsHedged ("we believe", "may help")Direct ("we guarantee", "the best")
OpinionsNeutral, balancedStrong, opinionated
Competitive referencesAvoids mentioning competitorsDirectly compares
PersonalityProfessional, understatedDistinctive, memorable
PromisesConservativeAmbitious
ControversyAvoidsEmbraces when aligned with values

Score: 1 (extremely reserved) to 10 (extremely bold)

Step 3: Tone Spectrum Mapping

Beyond the four dimensions, map how the brand's tone shifts across different contexts:

ContextTypical ToneExample
Homepage[Confident/Welcoming/Urgent/etc.]"[quote from homepage]"
Product description[Informative/Persuasive/Technical/etc.]"[quote]"
Blog post[Educational/Conversational/Authoritative/etc.]"[quote]"
Social media[Casual/Engaging/Promotional/etc.]"[quote]"
Error/404 page[Apologetic/Humorous/Helpful/etc.]"[quote]"
Email subject lines[Direct/Curious/Urgent/etc.]"[quote]"
CTA buttons[Action-oriented/Benefit-driven/Urgent/etc.]"[quote]"
Customer support[Empathetic/Professional/Friendly/etc.]"[quote]"

Step 4: Brand Personality Framework

Map the brand to one of five core personality archetypes (brands may blend 1-2):

The 5 Archetypes

1. The Authority

  • Characteristics: Expert, trustworthy, data-driven, established
  • Voice: Confident but not arrogant, educational, precise
  • Industries: Finance, healthcare, B2B enterprise, legal, consulting, industrial manufacturing, standards-driven sectors
  • Example brands: McKinsey, IBM, Mayo Clinic; Freudenberg, Trelleborg, Siemens
  • Key phrases: "Research shows...", "Tested to [standard]...", "Our engineers..."

2. The Innovator

  • Characteristics: Forward-thinking, disruptive, visionary, tech-savvy
  • Voice: Exciting, future-focused, sometimes provocative
  • Industries: Tech, SaaS, startups, renewable energy, advanced materials, automation
  • Example brands: Tesla, Stripe, Notion; Festo, Trumpf
  • Key phrases: "Reimagine...", "The future of...", "We're building..."

3. The Friend

  • Characteristics: Warm, approachable, helpful, relatable
  • Voice: Conversational, empathetic, inclusive, encouraging
  • Industries: Consumer products, education, community platforms, local and family-owned businesses
  • Example brands: Mailchimp, Slack, Duolingo
  • Key phrases: "We get it...", "You've got this...", "Here to help..."

4. The Rebel

  • Characteristics: Bold, challenging conventions, irreverent, passionate
  • Voice: Direct, opinionated, sometimes confrontational, memorable
  • Industries: Lifestyle, fitness, creative industries, direct-to-consumer
  • Example brands: Nike, Oatly, Cards Against Humanity
  • Key phrases: "Stop settling for...", "The truth is...", "We're done with..."
  • Rarely viable for regulated, safety-critical or procurement-led businesses — the tone that reads as brave to a consumer reads as unreliable to an auditor

5. The Guide

  • Characteristics: Wise, patient, methodical, trustworthy
  • Voice: Clear, instructional, supportive, knowledgeable
  • Industries: Education, professional development, tools, platforms, technical distribution, training academies
  • Example brands: HubSpot, Khan Academy, Ahrefs; Würth, RS Components
  • Key phrases: "Here's how to...", "Step by step...", "The complete guide to..."

Assessment:

  • Primary archetype: [which one and why]
  • Secondary archetype: [if applicable]
  • Archetype fit: [Strong/Moderate/Weak -- how well does the brand embody this archetype?]

Step 5: Vocabulary Analysis

Identify patterns in the brand's word choices:

Words They Use Frequently

Analyze all source material and identify the 15-20 most characteristic words or phrases. Organize by category:

Action words: (verbs they favor)

  • e.g., "build", "scale", "transform", "streamline"

Descriptive words: (adjectives they use)

  • e.g., "powerful", "simple", "enterprise-grade", "effortless"

Value words: (words that reflect their values)

  • e.g., "transparent", "sustainable", "inclusive", "innovative"

Industry-specific terms:

  • e.g., "workflow", "pipeline", "conversion", "engagement"

Words They Avoid

Identify words that are notably absent or that would feel out of character:

  • Words that are too casual for the brand (if formal)
  • Words that are too technical for the brand (if simple)
  • Competitor terminology they deliberately avoid
  • Industry cliches they seem to sidestep

Signature Phrases

Does the brand have any recurring phrases, taglines, or linguistic patterns?

  • Tagline: [if they have one]
  • Recurring phrases: [patterns you notice]
  • Linguistic patterns: [e.g., always starts sentences with verbs, uses dashes frequently, favors short paragraphs]

Step 6: Competitor Voice Comparison

Compare the brand's voice to 2-3 key competitors:

Voice Comparison Matrix:

Dimension[Brand]Competitor 1Competitor 2Competitor 3
Formal <> CasualX/10X/10X/10X/10
Serious <> PlayfulX/10X/10X/10X/10
Technical <> SimpleX/10X/10X/10X/10
Reserved <> BoldX/10X/10X/10X/10
Primary Archetype[type][type][type][type]

Differentiation Assessment:

  • How distinct is the brand's voice from competitors?
  • Where do voices overlap? (potential differentiation opportunity)
  • What voice territory is unoccupied in the competitive landscape?
  • Specific recommendations for vocal differentiation

Step 7: Consistency Audit

Assess voice consistency across all analyzed channels:

ChannelVoice ConsistencyNotes
HomepageConsistent/Mostly/Inconsistent[specific observations]
About pageConsistent/Mostly/Inconsistent[notes]
BlogConsistent/Mostly/Inconsistent[notes]
Social mediaConsistent/Mostly/Inconsistent[notes]
EmailConsistent/Mostly/Inconsistent[notes]
Product pagesConsistent/Mostly/Inconsistent[notes]

Common Consistency Issues:

  • Different writers creating noticeably different tones
  • Social media voice drastically different from website
  • Formal website copy but casual email newsletters
  • Blog content written in a completely different voice than product pages
  • Error messages or microcopy that feels off-brand
  • Old pages that haven't been updated to match current brand voice

Overall Consistency Score: X/10

Step 8: Brand Messaging Hierarchy

Document the brand's messaging from most distilled to most expanded:

Level 1: Tagline (under 10 words)

The most compressed form of the brand message.

  • Current: "[existing tagline or suggested one]"
  • Assessment: Does it capture the core value proposition?

Level 2: Value Propositions (1 sentence each)

3-5 core value propositions that support the brand promise.

  1. "[Value prop 1]"
  2. "[Value prop 2]"
  3. "[Value prop 3]"

Level 3: Elevator Pitch (30 seconds / 75 words)

A conversational explanation of what the brand does and why it matters. "[Draft elevator pitch based on analyzed content]"

Level 4: Boilerplate (100-150 words)

The standard "about us" paragraph used in press releases, email signatures, and speaker bios. "[Draft boilerplate based on analyzed content]"

Level 5: Full Brand Story (300-500 words)

The complete narrative of who the brand is, what they stand for, and why they exist.

  • Current status: [Exists/Partial/Missing]
  • Recommendations for improvement

Step 9: Generate Brand Voice Documentation

Create the comprehensive Do's and Don'ts guide:

Voice Chart

OUR VOICE IS:                    OUR VOICE IS NOT:
--------------------------------------------------
[Characteristic 1]              [Anti-characteristic 1]
e.g., "Confident"               e.g., "Arrogant"

[Characteristic 2]              [Anti-characteristic 2]
e.g., "Helpful"                 e.g., "Condescending"

[Characteristic 3]              [Anti-characteristic 3]
e.g., "Clear"                   e.g., "Dumbed down"

[Characteristic 4]              [Anti-characteristic 4]
e.g., "Bold"                    e.g., "Aggressive"

Writing Do's and Don'ts

DO:

  • [Specific writing instruction based on analysis]
  • [Example: "Use contractions to sound natural (we're, you'll, it's)"]
  • [Example: "Lead with the benefit, not the feature"]
  • [Example: "Use active voice in all headlines and CTAs"]
  • [Example: "Address the reader directly with 'you' and 'your'"]

DON'T:

  • [Specific anti-patterns based on analysis]
  • [Example: "Don't use jargon without explaining it"]
  • [Example: "Don't use passive voice in calls-to-action"]
  • [Example: "Don't use exclamation marks more than once per paragraph"]
  • [Example: "Don't start sentences with 'We' -- focus on the customer"]

Step 10: Copy Samples in Identified Voice

Provide 5-8 sample copy pieces written in the identified brand voice so the team has concrete examples to reference:

1. Homepage Headline: "[Sample headline in the brand voice]"

2. Product Description Paragraph: "[Sample product description in the brand voice]"

3. Blog Post Opening: "[Sample blog intro in the brand voice]"

4. Social Media Post: "[Sample social post in the brand voice]"

5. Email Subject Line: "[Sample subject line in the brand voice]"

6. CTA Button Text: "[Sample CTA text in the brand voice]"

7. Error Message: "[Sample error message in the brand voice]"

8. Customer Thank You Message: "[Sample thank you message in the brand voice]"

Output Format: MARKETKIT - BRAND-VOICE - <domain>.md

Write the exact output_path resolved in Phase 0 with:

[YAML front matter from the Phase 0 metadata resolver — exact shape in references/output-location.md. Omit the whole block when the resolver returned null.]

# Brand Voice Guidelines

## [Brand Name]

### Analysis Date: [Date]

---

## Voice Summary

[2-3 sentence summary of the brand voice, personality, and key characteristics]

---

## Voice Dimensions

### Formal <-----> Casual: [X/10]

[Evidence and explanation]

### Serious <-----> Playful: [X/10]

[Evidence and explanation]

### Technical <-----> Simple: [X/10]

[Evidence and explanation]

### Reserved <-----> Bold: [X/10]

[Evidence and explanation]

### Visual Voice Map

Formal Casual |----[X]----------------------------------| Serious Playful |--------[X]------------------------------| Technical Simple |------------------[X]--------------------| Reserved Bold |------------[X]--------------------------|


---

## Brand Personality
- Primary Archetype: [Archetype]
- Secondary Archetype: [Archetype]
- [Explanation and evidence]

---

## Tone by Context
| Context | Tone | Example |
|---|---|---|
| [context] | [tone] | "[example]" |

---

## Vocabulary

### Words We Use
[Organized word lists]

### Words We Avoid
[Words that don't fit the brand]

### Signature Phrases
[Recurring patterns and phrases]

---

## Voice Chart
| Our Voice IS | Our Voice IS NOT |
|---|---|
| [trait] | [anti-trait] |

---

## Writing Guidelines

### Do's
- [specific guidelines]

### Don'ts
- [specific anti-patterns]

---

## Brand Messaging Hierarchy

### Tagline
[tagline]

### Value Propositions
1. [value prop]

### Elevator Pitch
[pitch]

### Boilerplate
[boilerplate]

---

## Copy Samples
[8 examples of copy in the brand voice]

---

## Competitor Voice Comparison
[Comparison matrix and differentiation analysis]

---

## Consistency Audit
[Channel-by-channel assessment]
- Overall Consistency Score: [X/10]

---

## Recommendations
### Immediate Actions
1. [recommendation]

### Voice Evolution Opportunities
1. [recommendation]

### Consistency Improvements
1. [recommendation]

Key Principles

  • Brand voice analysis requires reading like a detective. Every word choice, punctuation decision, and sentence structure reveals something about how the brand wants to be perceived.
  • Always provide EVIDENCE for every assessment. Don't just say "the brand is casual" -- quote specific examples that prove it.
  • The brand voice guide should be usable by someone who has never worked with the brand before. A new copywriter should be able to read this document and write on-brand content.
  • Copy samples are the most valuable part of the deliverable. People learn voice by example, not by description. Make the samples diverse (headlines, body copy, social, email, error messages) so writers have references for every context.
  • Voice and tone are different. Voice is the consistent personality. Tone shifts based on context (a customer complaint response is different from a product launch announcement, but both should be in the same voice).
  • If the brand's voice is inconsistent across channels, frame it as an opportunity to strengthen their brand, not as a failure. Consistency issues are common and fixable.
  • If MARKETKIT - COMPETITOR-REPORT - <domain>.md exists in the Phase 0 audit_dir (same exact domain scope), use that data for the competitor voice comparison section. Never search older audit folders.
  • The voice dimensions should be plotted visually (text-based spectrum) so stakeholders can quickly understand the positioning at a glance.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.