report-pdf
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user asks for a PDF marketing report, a client-ready deliverable with charts and score gauges, or wants existing audit findings turned into a presentable document.
- Installs packages
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/grounding.md and load any _grounding/ folder it finds.
- Very specific: line 25
Use python3 on macOS/Linux.
- Distinctive: line 48
Rule of thumb: If the report is going to a client or prospect, use PDF.
- Distinctive: line 71
If the user insists on generating a report without prior audits, analyze the provided URL directly and build the data structure from scratch
- Very specific: line 72
Use the analyze_page.py script to gather automated data: python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/analyze_page.py" "<url>" (python instead of …
- Distinctive: line 203
Keep it concise and impactful.
- Very specific: line 260
Use the Write tool to save the assembled data to the exact output_path resolved in Phase 0 for REPORT-DATA (flat under data/).
- Distinctive: line 295
After generation, verify the PDF was created:
- Very specific: line 387
Run /marketkit:audit <url> -- Generates comprehensive audit data
- Very specific: line 388
Run /marketkit:competitors <url> -- Adds competitor comparison data
- Very specific: line 389
Run /marketkit:seo <url> -- Adds detailed SEO findings
- Very specific: line 390
Run /marketkit:landing <url> -- Adds CRO analysis
- Very specific: line 391
Run /marketkit:report-pdf <url> -- Compiles everything into a PDF
- Distinctive: line 406
Always verify the JSON data is complete and accurate before generating.
- Distinctive: line 407
Use the PDF for initial client impressions and sales conversations.
- Distinctive: line 408
Every score should be justifiable.
- Distinctive: line 410
Keep the executive summary tight -- 2-4 sentences maximum.
- Distinctive: line 411
If generating for a prospect (not yet a client), the report serves as a sales tool.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
PDF Marketing Report Generator
Phase 0: Grounding
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/grounding.md and load any _grounding/ folder it finds. Client documentation outranks every default in this skill, and any claim rules it contains bind the output. Name the loaded files at the top of what you produce.
Pass business-appropriate action items into the JSON. The script's built-in fallbacks are deliberately generic and should not reach a client PDF.
Also read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/output-location.md. Normalize the target URL to its exact non-www domain and resolve two paths now:
python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/resolve_audit_output.py" --purpose MARKETING-REPORT --scope <domain> --extension pdf
python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/resolve_audit_output.py" --purpose REPORT-DATA --scope <domain> --extension json --dataUse python3 on macOS/Linux. The first call's output_path is the final PDF; the second's is the flat intermediate JSON under data/. Retain audit_dir — Step 1 below reads prior skill output from it too.
Skill Purpose
Generate a professional, visually polished PDF marketing report using the Python script scripts/generate_pdf_report.py. This skill collects all available audit and analysis data, structures it into the expected JSON format, invokes the script, and produces a branded PDF with score gauges, bar charts, comparison tables, findings, and a prioritized action plan.
When to Use
- User wants a PDF version of the marketing report (not just Markdown)
- User is preparing a deliverable for a client presentation
- User asks for a "polished report", "client-ready report", or "PDF report"
- User wants a visual report with charts and scores
- Triggered by
/marketkit:report-pdfor/marketkit:report-pdf <domain>
When to Use PDF vs Markdown
| Format | Best For | Pros | Cons |
| Client presentations, email attachments, sales collateral | Professional appearance, consistent formatting, visual charts, printable | Harder to edit, requires Python script | |
| Markdown | Internal use, quick reference, iterative editing, version control | Easy to edit, readable in any editor, git-friendly | Less visually polished, no charts |
Rule of thumb: If the report is going to a client or prospect, use PDF. If it is for internal use or further editing, use Markdown.
How to Execute
Step 1: Collect All Available Data
Gather data from all previous skill runs. Check only inside the audit_dir resolved in Phase 0, for the exact same domain scope — never search older audit folders.
Primary data sources (MARKETKIT - <PURPOSE> - <domain>.md unless noted):
MARKETING-AUDIT-- Overall audit resultsLANDING-CRO-- Landing page conversion analysisSEO-AUDIT-- SEO findingsBRAND-VOICE-- Brand voice analysisCOMPETITOR-REPORT-- Competitor comparison dataFUNNEL-ANALYSIS-- Funnel analysisSOCIAL-CALENDAR-- Social media planEMAIL-SEQUENCES-- Email marketing planAD-CAMPAIGNS-- Advertising plan
If no previous data exists:
- Recommend the user run
/marketkit:audit <url>first for the best results - If the user insists on generating a report without prior audits, analyze the provided URL directly and build the data structure from scratch
- Use the analyze_page.py script to gather automated data:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/analyze_page.py" "<url>"(pythoninstead ofpython3on Windows)
Step 2: Build the JSON Data Structure
The scripts/generate_pdf_report.py script expects a JSON file as input with this exact structure:
{
"url": "https://example.com",
"date": "March 1, 2026",
"brand_name": "Example Co",
"report_metadata": {
"prepared_by": "[exact resolver output; omit this entire object when disabled]",
"document_author": "[exact resolver output]",
"toolkit": "Market Context Kit",
"host": "[exact active host]",
"llm_provider": "[exact active provider]",
"llm_model": "[exact active model]",
"generated_at": "[exact resolver output]"
},
"overall_score": 62,
"executive_summary": "A 2-4 sentence summary of the overall marketing health, key opportunities, and estimated revenue impact of implementing recommendations.",
"categories": {
"Content & Messaging": {
"score": 68,
"weight": "25%"
},
"Conversion Optimization": {
"score": 52,
"weight": "20%"
},
"SEO & Discoverability": {
"score": 74,
"weight": "20%"
},
"Competitive Positioning": {
"score": 48,
"weight": "15%"
},
"Brand & Trust": {
"score": 70,
"weight": "10%"
},
"Growth & Strategy": {
"score": 55,
"weight": "10%"
}
},
"findings": [
{
"severity": "Critical",
"finding": "Description of the most important finding"
},
{
"severity": "High",
"finding": "Description of a high-priority finding"
},
{
"severity": "Medium",
"finding": "Description of a medium-priority finding"
},
{
"severity": "Low",
"finding": "Description of a lower-priority finding"
}
],
"quick_wins": [
"First quick win action item",
"Second quick win action item",
"Third quick win action item"
],
"medium_term": [
"First medium-term action item",
"Second medium-term action item",
"Third medium-term action item"
],
"strategic": [
"First strategic action item",
"Second strategic action item",
"Third strategic action item"
],
"competitors": [
{
"name": "Competitor A",
"positioning": "Their market position",
"pricing": "Their pricing model",
"social_proof": "Their trust signals",
"content": "Their content approach"
},
{
"name": "Competitor B",
"positioning": "Their market position",
"pricing": "Their pricing model",
"social_proof": "Their trust signals",
"content": "Their content approach"
}
]
}Step 3: Field-by-Field Data Assembly Guide
url (string, required)
The target website URL. Use the full URL including protocol.
date (string, required)
The report generation date. Format: "Month DD, YYYY" (e.g., "March 1, 2026").
brand_name (string, required)
The company or brand name. Used in competitor comparison table headers.
overall_score (integer, 0-100, required)
The weighted average of all category scores. Calculate as:
overall_score = (content * 0.25) + (conversion * 0.20) + (seo * 0.20) + (competitive * 0.15) + (brand * 0.10) + (growth * 0.10)executive_summary (string, required)
A 2-4 sentence summary covering:
- Current marketing health assessment
- Top 1-2 most impactful findings
- Estimated revenue impact of implementing recommendations
- Recommended first step
Keep it concise and impactful. This appears on the cover page right below the score gauge.
categories (object, required)
Exactly 6 categories with their scores. The categories map to these evaluation areas:
| Category | What It Measures | Scoring Guidance |
| Content & Messaging | Copy quality, value proposition, headline clarity, CTA text, brand voice consistency | 80+: Clear, benefit-driven, specific. 60-79: Adequate but generic. <60: Vague, feature-focused, unclear |
| Conversion Optimization | Social proof, form design, CTA placement, objection handling, urgency | 80+: Multiple proof types, optimized forms, clear CTAs. 60-79: Some elements present. <60: Missing critical elements |
| SEO & Discoverability | Title tags, meta descriptions, headers, schema, internal linking, page speed | 80+: Fully optimized. 60-79: Mostly present with gaps. <60: Major issues or missing elements |
| Competitive Positioning | Differentiation, commercial path clarity, comparison content, market awareness | 80+: Clear positioning, comparison pages or equivalent proof assets exist. 60-79: Some differentiation. <60: No clear positioning |
| Brand & Trust | Design quality, trust badges, security indicators, professional appearance | 80+: Modern design, trust signals throughout. 60-79: Adequate design. <60: Outdated or unprofessional |
| Growth & Strategy | Lead capture, email marketing, content strategy, acquisition channels | 80+: Multi-channel strategy in place. 60-79: Some channels active. <60: No clear growth strategy |
findings (array, required)
An array of finding objects, each with severity and finding fields.
Severity levels:
Critical-- Directly losing revenue or customers. Fix immediately.High-- Significant impact on growth. Fix within 1-2 weeks.Medium-- Meaningful improvement opportunity. Fix within 1 month.Low-- Nice-to-have improvement. Fix when time allows.
Writing effective findings:
- Be specific: "Homepage headline says 'Welcome to Our Platform'" not "Headline needs improvement"
- Quantify impact: "Missing meta descriptions on 8 of 12 landing pages"
- Reference benchmarks: "Page load time is 4.2s (benchmark: under 2s)"
- Include evidence: "No testimonials found on homepage, pricing/RFQ/contact page, or signup/enrollment page"
Aim for 5-10 findings. Order from most to least severe.
quick_wins (array, required)
3-5 action items that can be implemented within one week with minimal effort. Each should be a specific, actionable instruction.
Good quick win: "Rewrite the homepage headline from 'Welcome to Our Platform' to 'Cut Your Reporting Time by 75% -- Automated Analytics for Growth Teams'"
Bad quick win: "Improve the headline" (too vague)
medium_term (array, required)
3-5 action items requiring 1-3 months to implement. These are more involved but have high impact.
strategic (array, required)
3-5 action items requiring 3-6 months. These are foundational changes that require planning and sustained effort.
competitors (array, optional)
Up to 3 competitor objects for the comparison table. If no competitor data is available, omit this field -- the script will skip the competitor section.
Step 4: Write the JSON File
Use the Write tool to save the assembled data to the exact output_path resolved in Phase 0 for REPORT-DATA (flat under data/). The Write tool creates the folder if it doesn't exist yet — do not mkdir separately.
Do not build this file with a shell heredoc or echo redirect. Heredoc quoting differs between shells and breaks on Windows, and JSON containing quotes, $, or backticks gets corrupted. The Write tool behaves identically on every platform. For the same reason, do not use /tmp — it does not exist on Windows.
Step 5: Invoke the PDF Generator Script
Prerequisites check: First, verify that reportlab is installed:
# macOS / Linux
python3 -c "import reportlab" || pip3 install reportlab
# Windows
python -c "import reportlab" || pip install reportlabGenerate the report:
# macOS / Linux
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/generate_pdf_report.py" "<REPORT-DATA output_path>" "<MARKETING-REPORT output_path>"
# Windows
python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/generate_pdf_report.py" "<REPORT-DATA output_path>" "<MARKETING-REPORT output_path>"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} resolves to this plugin's directory on any machine — never hardcode a path. Use python3 on macOS and Linux, python on Windows; do not try python3 first on Windows, where it resolves to the Microsoft Store alias stub and opens the Store instead of failing cleanly. Pass the two exact output_path values resolved in Phase 0 — do not reconstruct them.
Demo mode (no arguments): Running the script without arguments generates a sample report with placeholder data:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/generate_pdf_report.py"
# Creates: MARKETING-REPORT-sample.pdf in the current directoryStep 6: Verify the Output
After generation, verify the PDF was created:
ls -la "<MARKETING-REPORT output_path>"Report the file path and size to the user.
The REPORT-DATA JSON under data/ is a kept intermediate, not a temp file — never delete it. It lets a later report-pdf or report run reuse this run's assembled data.
PDF Report Contents
The generated PDF includes the following pages:
Page 1: Cover Page
- Report title: "Marketing Audit Report"
- Target URL
- Generation date
- Overall score gauge (circular visualization with color coding)
- Grade letter (A+ through F)
- Executive summary paragraph
Page 2: Score Breakdown
- Horizontal bar chart showing all 6 category scores with color coding
- Score table with category names, scores, weights, and status labels
- Color coding: Green (80+), Blue (60-79), Yellow (40-59), Red (<40)
Page 3: Key Findings
- Findings table with severity labels and descriptions
- Color-coded severity indicators (Critical = red, High = orange, Medium = yellow, Low = blue)
- Findings ordered from most to least severe
Page 4: Prioritized Action Plan
- Quick Wins section (This Week)
- Medium-Term section (1-3 Months)
- Strategic section (3-6 Months)
- Numbered action items in each tier
Page 5: Competitive Landscape (if competitor data provided)
- Comparison table with client vs up to 3 competitors
- Rows: Positioning, Pricing, Social Proof, Content
Final Page: Methodology
- Scoring methodology explanation
- Category weights and measurement criteria
- Optional footer: exact toolkit, host, provider, and model from
report_metadata; omit when metadata is disabled
Color Scheme
The PDF uses a professional color palette:
| Element | Color | Hex Code |
| Primary (headers, titles) | Dark Navy | #1B2A4A |
| Accent (links, highlights) | Blue | #2D5BFF |
| Highlight (attention) | Orange | #FF6B35 |
| Success (high scores) | Green | #00C853 |
| Warning (medium scores) | Amber | #FFB300 |
| Danger (low scores, critical) | Red | #FF1744 |
| Light background | Light Gray | #F5F7FA |
| Body text | Dark Gray | #2C3E50 |
| Secondary text | Medium Gray | #7F8C9B |
| Borders | Light Border | #E0E6ED |
Score-to-Color Mapping
- 80-100: Green (#00C853) -- Strong performance
- 60-79: Blue (#2D5BFF) -- Solid with room to improve
- 40-59: Amber (#FFB300) -- Needs attention
- 0-39: Red (#FF1744) -- Critical issues
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Solution |
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'reportlab' | Run pip3 install reportlab |
| Script produces empty PDF | Check that JSON data has all required fields |
| Score gauge not rendering | Ensure overall_score is a number 0-100 |
| Competitor table missing | Ensure competitors array has objects with name, positioning, pricing, social_proof, content fields |
| PDF is only 1 page | Check for JSON parsing errors -- run python3 -c "import json; json.load(open('<REPORT-DATA output_path>'))" |
| Fonts look wrong | The script uses Helvetica (built into reportlab). No custom fonts needed. |
Integration with Other Skills
This skill works best when combined with other audit skills. The recommended workflow:
- Run
/marketkit:audit <url>-- Generates comprehensive audit data - Run
/marketkit:competitors <url>-- Adds competitor comparison data - Run
/marketkit:seo <url>-- Adds detailed SEO findings - Run
/marketkit:landing <url>-- Adds CRO analysis - Run
/marketkit:report-pdf <url>-- Compiles everything into a PDF
The PDF report skill will automatically look for output files from these skills and incorporate their data into the report JSON.
Output: MARKETKIT - MARKETING-REPORT - <domain>.pdf
- File: the exact
output_pathresolved in Phase 0 forMARKETING-REPORT - Location: the active audit folder, resolved per
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/output-location.md(Audit/) - Data:
MARKETKIT - REPORT-DATA - <domain>.json, kept flat underdata/ - Size: Typically 200KB-500KB depending on content volume
- Pages: 5-7 pages depending on whether competitor data and additional sections are included
Key Principles
- The PDF report is the most client-facing deliverable in the toolkit. Quality matters.
- Always verify the JSON data is complete and accurate before generating. Garbage in, garbage out.
- Use the PDF for initial client impressions and sales conversations. Follow up with the more detailed Markdown report if the client engages.
- Every score should be justifiable. If a client asks "why did I get a 52 in Conversion Optimization?", the findings should provide clear evidence.
- Round scores to whole numbers. Decimals imply false precision.
- Keep the executive summary tight -- 2-4 sentences maximum. Clients skim cover pages.
- If generating for a prospect (not yet a client), the report serves as a sales tool. Make the opportunities compelling and the action plan achievable.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

