blast-radius
Skill4 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Find non-local breakage from a change and prove the decisive safety invariant with executable evidence. Use for blast radius, what could this break, or a suspicious small diff.
111 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- marmot-protocol/mdktheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphustheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Loner1024/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- imranbarbhuiya/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- caidanw/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ketchup-video, principle-never-block-on-the-human and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 14 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillprinciple-never-block-on-the-human
Apply when safe reversible implementation details can proceed inside scope.
Also in 44 projects that use this
ianclearySkillprinciple-explain-the-number
Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.
Also in 29 projects that use this
eryzerzSkillmake-bot-ui
Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.
Also in 20 projects that use this
bnemaSkillsetup-pstack
Configure which Pi models pstack uses per role. Detects available provider/model specs and writes pstack's user configuration. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", or changing pstack model choices.
Also in 25 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillprinciple-make-operations-idempotent
Apply when an operation must tolerate retries after partial completion.
Also in 46 projects that use this
- +6 more from jaydubya818
Other versions111 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 111
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8ksame name
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow★ 1.7ksame name
- pixeltable/pixeltable★ 1.7ksame name
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 667same name
- savannahfeder/agentbox★ 376same name
- jtaroreh/agystack★ 128same name
- uzairansaruzi/p3-stack★ 126same name
- Dimon94/dverity★ 107same name
101 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository117 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- accessibilitySkill
- agent-watchdogSkill
- aipSkill
- animateSkill
- animation-performanceSkill
- animation-vocabularySkill
- ask-benSkill
- ask-sonnerSkill
- bazelSkill
- bend-lawsSkill
- brain-dumpSkill
- break-uiSkill
- ci-fixesSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- codex-compatSkill
- codexSkill
- commit-push-prSkill
- connect-querySkill
- create-verification-skillSkill
- demoSkill
- development-lifecycleSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- docsSkill
- dogfoodSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- e2e-testingSkill
- effect-tsSkill
- effect-v3-to-v4Skill
- efficient-frontierSkill
- eli5Skill
- excalidraw-diagramSkill
- extend-harnessSkill
- frontend-invariantsSkill
- frontend-starter-kitSkill
- full-sendSkill
- gesturesSkill
- golang-reviewSkill
- golangSkill
- goSkill
- grillingSkill
- handoffSkill
- hook-auditSkill
- implement-specSkill
- improve-animationsSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- improveSkill
- launchdarklySkill
- lie-detectorSkill
- maintain-verification-skillSkill
- make-pr-easy-to-reviewSkill
- mobile-nativeSkill
- plan-arbiterSkill
- plow-aheadSkill
- postgresqlSkill
- primeSkill
- productSkill
- protobufSkill
- prototypeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 106 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 6
When proving changed behavior or maintaining verification, read the Poteto adaptation.
- Distinctive: line 24
Read the complete change, changed symbols, call sites, producers, consumers, schemas, and public surfaces.
- Distinctive: line 26
Look where symbol search stops: serialized data, database columns, feature flags, another language, library source at the pinned version, …
- Very specific: line 29
If the running user path is available, exercise it through /dogfood.
- Distinctive: line 39
Keep risks evidence-backed and bounded.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 106 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
When proving changed behavior or maintaining verification, read the Poteto adaptation.
Blast radius
Find what a change can break beyond its diff. Listing callers is reconnaissance, not the result. The result is the one fact the change is safe because of, proven as directly as practical.
Contract
- Fixed point: review the requested base through current working state unless the caller supplies another point.
- Fence: inspect non-local contracts and run verification; do not edit product code.
- Question: what hidden consumer, lifecycle, wire shape, shared state, or external contract can turn this change into a defect?
Proof ladder
Move each safety fact down this ladder as cheaply as possible: source line -> walked counterexample -> executable script or test -> real running entrypoint. A claim below executable proof is unproven, not safe by confidence.
Pass
- Read the complete change, changed symbols, call sites, producers, consumers, schemas, and public surfaces. State what behavior differs, including implicit timing and lifecycle changes.
- Name the decisive safety invariant. Prefer one fact that clears several speculative risks, such as "the operation only removes expired entries and is otherwise inert."
- Look where symbol search stops: serialized data, database columns, feature flags, another language, library source at the pinned version, teardown order, retries, concurrency, and callers reached through configuration.
- Build the smallest credible failure path. Separate confirmed risks from checked-and-cleared paths. Cite exact evidence; a search that finds nothing is evidence only when the searched scope is complete.
- Prove the invariant through the real code. Add a disposable script or focused public-contract test when that is the cheapest executable check. Do not keep a test that only repeats source text.
- If the running user path is available, exercise it through
/dogfood. Record where each fact stopped on the proof ladder.
Output
- Change: observable semantic difference.
- Safety invariant: exact fact, proof rung, command, and observation; otherwise
unproven. - Risks: failure path, likelihood, impact, evidence, and cheapest check.
- Cleared: paths checked and the evidence that clears them.
- Before merge: smallest command or reproduction that fails if the invariant is false.
Keep risks evidence-backed and bounded. Do not inflate a list of possibilities after the decisive invariant has been proven.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

