research
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture findings as a markdown file in the repo. Spins up a background agent so the main conversation keeps working while it reads.
189 other projects use a version of this, 53 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dialog-db/dialog-dbtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- howells/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- xiaoxiaosrm/dsh-mattpocock-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Suge8/friedbuntheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- wowyuarm/dsh-agent-teamedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Contexera/dsh-agent-teamedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
LambenthanSkilldaily-arxiv
每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新
Also in 5 projects that use this
LambenthanSkillexp-eval
实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges
Also in 5 projects that use this
truongtv22SkillProblem-Solving Techniques
Apply systematic problem-solving techniques for complexity spirals (simplification cascades), innovation blocks (collision-zone thinking), recurring patterns (meta-pattern recognition), assumption constraints (inversion exercise), scale uncertainty (scale game), and dispatch when stuck. Techniques derived from Microsoft Amplifier project patterns adapted for immediate application.
Also in 5 projects that use this
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 43 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-eval
Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-run
Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +5 more from Lambenthan
- +1 more from skyllwt
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 53
- mattpocock/skills★ 309k30% same
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40k32% same
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40k32% same
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3k32% same
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9k32% same
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1k32% same
- CelestoAI/SmolVM★ 1.2k32% same
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 66732% same
- aws/graph-explorer★ 49032% same
- biersoeckli/QuickStack★ 36532% same
43 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 136
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- udecode/plate★ 17ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- docker/docs★ 4.7ksame name
- thinking-machines-lab/tinker-cookbook★ 4.2ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
126 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- document-directorySkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- prototypeSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- scope-lockSkill
- setupSkill
- start-sessionSkill
- tddSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- wayfinderSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 169 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Write findings to a single markdown file, citing each claim's source.
- Distinctive: line 24
When the research agent completes, summarize key findings back to the caller (wayfinder or the user).
- Distinctive: line 37
Never cite secondary sources as the authority — trace back to primary.
- Distinctive: line 38
Never guess when the answer is findable.
- Distinctive: line 39
Never block the main conversation — always use a background agent.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 169 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Research
Investigate a question against primary sources — official docs, source code, specs, first-party APIs — not secondary write-ups. Follow every claim back to the source that owns it.
Process
- Spin up a background agent so the main conversation keeps working while it reads.
- The background agent's job:
- Investigate the question against primary sources only.
- Write findings to a single markdown file, citing each claim's source.
- Save where the repo already keeps such notes; if no convention
exists, use
docs/research/.
- When the research agent completes, summarize key findings back to the caller (wayfinder or the user).
What counts as a primary source
- Official documentation (not blog posts about the docs)
- Source code of the library/tool in question
- Published specifications (RFCs, W3C specs, language specs)
- First-party API references
- The project's own code and git history
What this skill must never do
- Never cite secondary sources as the authority — trace back to primary.
- Never guess when the answer is findable.
- Never block the main conversation — always use a background agent.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

