agentleFS
lynchypinlynchypin/project-onboard/skills/implement/SKILL.md

implement

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Implement one ticket with TDD at seams, type checking, tests, code-review, then commit. Called by wayfinder for each implementation ticket. The per-ticket quality gate replaces the old final review pass.

191 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, ask-matt and 6 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 43 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    ask-matt

    Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

    Also in 91 projects that use this

  • RoentekSkill

    loop-me

    Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

    Also in 50 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    to-questionnaire

    Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.

    Also in 88 projects that use this

  • ryotaroh180105Skill

    claude-handoff

    Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.

    Also in 42 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-beats

    Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.

    Also in 47 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Red: Write a failing test at a pre-agreed seam (public interface).

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Green: Write the smallest honest implementation that makes the test pass.

    line 20
  3. Distinctive:

    Red before green: No implementation before its test exists and fails for the right reason.

    line 46
  4. Distinctive:

    Green means smallest honest implementation: No stubbing the behavior under test.

    line 48
  5. Distinctive:

    Never skip tests at agreed seams.

    line 69
  6. Distinctive:

    Never commit without the full test sweep passing.

    line 70
  7. Distinctive:

    Never skip code review before committing.

    line 71
  8. Distinctive:

    Never write a test that can't actually fail.

    line 72

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Implement

Implement one ticket. This is the per-ticket implementation cycle, called by wayfinder for each ticket in the breakdown.

Process

  1. Confirm the ticket is unblocked — its dependencies (if tracked) are done. If not, report back to wayfinder to pick a different one.
  2. Red. Write a failing test at a pre-agreed seam (public interface). Confirm it fails for the expected reason, not an unrelated error.
  3. Green. Write the smallest honest implementation that makes the test pass. No hardcoding expected output.
  4. Type check regularly throughout implementation.
  5. Run tests — the specific test file as you work, then a full test sweep at the end. Evidence gate: the ticket is not done until you paste the actual green test/command output. Asserting "tests pass" without the output does not advance the ticket.
  6. Invoke skills/code-review/SKILL.md to review the work.
  7. Commit the work to the current branch. One commit per completed ticket with a message describing what it delivers.
  8. Update tracking — mark the ticket as done in the configured tracker.

TDD discipline

Uses /codebase-design vocabulary for seam placement: accept dependencies don't create them; place seams at volatile boundaries; the interface is the test surface.

  • Tests verify behavior through seams — pre-agreed public interfaces and boundaries. Never test implementation internals.
  • Red before green. No implementation before its test exists and fails for the right reason.
  • Green means smallest honest implementation. No stubbing the behavior under test.

Reference: skills/tdd/SKILL.md for the full TDD discipline (red→green, anti-patterns).

Anti-patterns (never do these)

  • Implementation-coupled tests (testing private methods, internal state).
  • Tautological assertions (mock wired to be called, then asserted).
  • Horizontal slicing within a ticket.
  • Skipping the code-review step.

Bundled skill references

  • skills/tdd/SKILL.md — TDD discipline reference
  • skills/codebase-design/SKILL.md — vocabulary for seam placement and interface depth

What this skill must never do

  • Never skip tests at agreed seams.
  • Never commit without the full test sweep passing.
  • Never skip code review before committing.
  • Never write a test that can't actually fail.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.