agentleFS
loremaster-ailoremaster-ai/loremaster/skills/sprint-retro/SKILL.md

sprint-retro

Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Invoked at sprint end (explicit /sprint-retro only) to gather progress, decisions, completions, and blockers from the lore vault into a retro draft in the PM role — request-driven; **scope ends at generating the retro draft — it draws no conclusions**; this channel = this project only.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Only what has evidence in the lore vault: Never invent events or numbers.

    line 49

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Sprint Retro (PM)

Gathers the data and sets the table for the retro. Does no evaluating, judging, or concluding (that is the team's job, in the meeting).

Sources to read (this sprint's scope)

  • Connections and patterns first via graphify (structure): treat the god-nodes (highly connected core concepts) and surprising connections (unexpected cross-links) in graphify-out/GRAPH_REPORT.md as retro-material candidates. For delayed or blocked items, use graphify explain "<concept>" and graphify path "<A>" "<B>" to trace structurally what the item depends on or connects to that caused the blockage (e.g., "login delay" is connected to the "switch-to-Google decision" and "store review"). Do not read everything wholesale; read only the sources the graph points to.
  • Jira backlog: done/in-progress/blockers + plan vs. actual (completion rate, carry-over) + (if recorded) estimated vs. actual time. Progress checklists are not in the lore vault (they live in each team member's dev repo), so treat Jira as the source of truth for progress and time.
  • wiki/ (concepts, decision history): decisions and reversals made during the sprint (only what graphify points to)
  • conflicts/: conflicts that occurred and were resolved

Retro draft structure

  1. Plan vs. actual — completion rate, carry-over (as far as the data goes).
  2. Estimated vs. actual time feedback — if Jira has estimate/actual times, lay them side by side per item to surface estimation accuracy (e.g., "login estimated 2d / actual 5d — 2.5x over"). If there is no data, mark "no time data" and gently remind the team to record estimates and actuals in Jira. This is for calibrating estimates, not for evaluation.
  3. What went well / what got stuck — based on blocker and conflict patterns.
  4. Decision retro — reasons behind reversed decisions (from decisions).
  5. Discussion questions — phrase improvements as questions (never force conclusions).

Provide the minutes form + polish

  • Along with the retro draft, present an empty meeting-minutes form in Slack so a human can easily fill it into raw/:
    # Sprint Retro — <sprint>/<date>
    ## Attendees
    ## What went well
    ## What got stuck / causes
    ## Estimated vs. actual (estimate calibration)
    ## Action items (owner / due date)
  • Once a human fills in this form and records it in raw/ (e.g., raw/meetings/retro_<date>.md), polish that meeting note on invocation — typo fixes, structure cleanup, and item ordering only. No content invention, no added conclusions (blanks stay blank). The polished result is also applied only after human confirmation.

Rules (invariants)

  • No evaluation, no blame, no judgment. ("A was slow" ✕ → "task X delayed N days, cause needs discussion" ○)
  • Only what has evidence in the lore vault. Never invent events or numbers. If there is no data, mark "no data".
  • Retro outcomes (actions) are recorded by a human as meeting notes in raw/ → fed back through the normal pipeline. This skill does not finalize decisions or actions.
  • This channel = this project only. No mentioning or referencing other projects.

Output

  • Post the retro draft to Slack (sections 1–5 + evidence sources) + the empty minutes form. No automatic minutes writing (scope ends at providing the form and polishing).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.