hotfix
Skill8 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Emergency fix workflow that bypasses normal sprint processes with a full audit trail. Creates hotfix branch, tracks approvals, and ensures the fix is backported correctly.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Read the bug description or ID.
- Distinctive: line 17
If severity is S3 or lower, recommend using the normal bug fix workflow instead and stop.
- Very specific: line 53
Ask: "May I write this to production/hotfixes/hotfix-[date]-[short-name].md?"
- Distinctive: line 55
If yes, write the file, creating the directory if needed.
- Distinctive: line 61
If git is initialized, create the hotfix branch:
- Distinctive: line 75
Update the hotfix record with root cause, fix details, and test results.
- Distinctive: line 81
Use the Task tool to request sign-off in parallel:
- Distinctive: line 87
All three must return APPROVE before proceeding.
- Very specific: line 93
After approvals, determine the QA scope required before deploying the hotfix.
- Distinctive: line 98
Ask qa-lead: Is a full smoke check sufficient, or does this fix require a targeted team-qa pass?
- Distinctive: line 105
Do not skip this gate. A hotfix that breaks something else is worse than the original bug.
- Distinctive: line 111
Update the original bug file if one exists:
- Distinctive: line 140
Every hotfix must have a rollback plan documented before deployment
- Distinctive: line 142
All hotfixes require a post-incident review within 48 hours
- Very specific: line 143
If the fix is complex enough to need more than 4 hours, escalate to technical-director
- Very specific: line 149
After deploying, run /bug-report verify [BUG-ID] to confirm the fix resolved the issue in the deployed build.
- Very specific: line 151
If VERIFIED FIXED: run /bug-report close [BUG-ID] to formally close it.
- Distinctive: line 152
If STILL PRESENT: the hotfix failed — immediately re-open, assess rollback, and escalate.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Explicit invocation only: This skill should only run when the user explicitly requests it with
/hotfix. Do not auto-invoke based on context matching.
Phase 1: Assess Severity
Read the bug description or ID. Determine severity:
- S1 (Critical): Game unplayable, data loss, security vulnerability — hotfix immediately
- S2 (Major): Significant feature broken, workaround exists — hotfix within 24 hours
- If severity is S3 or lower, recommend using the normal bug fix workflow instead and stop.
Phase 2: Create Hotfix Record
Draft the hotfix record:
## Hotfix: [Short Description]
Date: [Date]
Severity: [S1/S2]
Reporter: [Who found it]
Status: IN PROGRESS
### Problem
[Clear description of what is broken and the player impact]
### Root Cause
[To be filled during investigation]
### Fix
[To be filled during implementation]
### Testing
[What was tested and how]
### Approvals
- [ ] Fix reviewed by lead-programmer
- [ ] Regression test passed (qa-tester)
- [ ] Release approved (producer)
### Rollback Plan
[How to revert if the fix causes new issues]Ask: "May I write this to production/hotfixes/hotfix-[date]-[short-name].md?"
If yes, write the file, creating the directory if needed.
Phase 3: Create Hotfix Branch
If git is initialized, create the hotfix branch:
git checkout -b hotfix/[short-name] [release-tag-or-main]Phase 4: Investigate and Implement
Focus on the minimal change that resolves the issue. Do NOT refactor, clean up, or add features alongside the hotfix.
Validate the fix by running targeted tests for the affected system. Check for regressions in adjacent systems.
Update the hotfix record with root cause, fix details, and test results.
Phase 5: Collect Approvals
Use the Task tool to request sign-off in parallel:
subagent_type: lead-programmer— Review the fix for correctness and side effectssubagent_type: qa-tester— Run targeted regression tests on the affected systemsubagent_type: producer— Approve deployment timing and communication plan
All three must return APPROVE before proceeding. If any returns CONCERNS or REJECT, do not deploy — surface the issue and resolve it first.
Phase 5b: QA Re-Entry Gate
After approvals, determine the QA scope required before deploying the hotfix. Spawn qa-lead via Task with:
- The hotfix description and affected system
- The regression test results from Phase 5
- A list of all systems that touch the changed files (use Grep to find callers)
Ask qa-lead: Is a full smoke check sufficient, or does this fix require a targeted team-qa pass?
Apply the verdict:
- Smoke check sufficient — run
/smoke-checkagainst the hotfix build. If PASS, proceed to Phase 6. - Targeted QA pass required — run
/team-qa [affected-system]scoped to the changed system only. If QA returns APPROVED or APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS, proceed to Phase 6. - Full QA required — S1 fixes that touch core systems may require a full
/team-qa sprint. This delays deployment but prevents a bad patch.
Do not skip this gate. A hotfix that breaks something else is worse than the original bug.
Phase 6: Update Bug Status and Deploy
Update the original bug file if one exists:
## Fix Record
**Fixed in**: hotfix/[branch-name] — [commit hash or description]
**Fixed date**: [date]
**Status**: Fixed — Pending VerificationSet **Status**: Fixed — Pending Verification in the bug file header.
Output a deployment summary:
## Hotfix Ready to Deploy: [short-name]
**Severity**: [S1/S2]
**Root cause**: [one line]
**Fix**: [one line]
**QA gate**: [Smoke check PASS / Team-QA APPROVED]
**Approvals**: lead-programmer ✓ / qa-tester ✓ / producer ✓
**Rollback plan**: [from Phase 2 record]
Merge to: release branch AND development branch
Next: /bug-report verify [BUG-ID] after deploy to confirm resolutionRules
- Hotfixes must be the MINIMUM change to fix the issue — no cleanup, no refactoring
- Every hotfix must have a rollback plan documented before deployment
- Hotfix branches merge to BOTH the release branch AND the development branch
- All hotfixes require a post-incident review within 48 hours
- If the fix is complex enough to need more than 4 hours, escalate to
technical-director
Phase 7: Post-Deploy Verification
After deploying, run /bug-report verify [BUG-ID] to confirm the fix resolved the issue in the deployed build.
If VERIFIED FIXED: run /bug-report close [BUG-ID] to formally close it.
If STILL PRESENT: the hotfix failed — immediately re-open, assess rollback, and escalate.
Schedule a post-incident review within 48 hours using /retrospective hotfix.
Other versions27 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 93100% same
- dawn840705/claude-code-studios★ 1100% same
Edited · 9
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27k30% same
- tranhieutt/software_development_department★ 7148% same
- CoralGame/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 1973% same
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 1797% same
- hongyuanc/codex-game-studios★ 546% same
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Plugin★ 174% same
- scotidev/GameDevStudio★ 173% same
- Swih/godot-foundry★ 170% same
- venus2099/codex-game-studios★ 130% same
Wrote their own version · 16
- microsoft/roosterjs★ 1.3ksame name
- nudgebee/nudgebee★ 519same name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- Aurealibe/claude-config★ 68same name
- cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio★ 40same name
- CodePhobiia/claude-roblox-game-studio★ 9same name
- edjchapman/claude-code-config★ 8same name
- skullninja/coco-workflow★ 8same name
- florian101010/awesome-agentic-AI-coding-template★ 4same name
- gonimar/claude-web-studio★ 4same name
6 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository76 other files it gives its agents.
- CCGS Skill Testing Framework/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- design/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- src/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adoptSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- art-bibleSkill
- asset-auditSkill
- asset-specSkill
- balance-checkSkill
- brainstormSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- bug-triageSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- content-auditSkill
- create-architectureSkill
- create-control-manifestSkill
- create-epicsSkill
- create-storiesSkill
- day-one-patchSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-storySkill
- estimateSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- helpSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- localizeSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- onboardSkill
- patch-notesSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- playtest-reportSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- propagate-design-changeSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qa-planSkill
- quick-designSkill
- regression-suiteSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- review-all-gddsSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- security-auditSkill
- setup-engineSkill
- skill-improveSkill
- skill-testSkill
- smoke-checkSkill
- soak-testSkill
- sprint-planSkill
- sprint-statusSkill
- startSkill
- story-doneSkill
- story-readinessSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

