codeconductor
CLAUDE.md0 starsChanged 25 days agoMITView on GitHub
These guidelines reduce common LLM coding mistakes. They bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment. Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs. Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative. Ask: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify. Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess. The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request. Define success criteria. Loop until verified. Transform tasks into verifiable goals: For…
In this repository219 other files it gives its agents.
- .agents/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/behavioral-discipline.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/context-budget.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/orchestration.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/yagni-stdlib.mdcCursor rule
- androidSkill
- android-ui-designSkill
- api-versioningSkill
- astroSkill
- auth-token-inspectorSkill
- backlogSkill
- cc-api-contractSkill
- cc-db-migrationSkill
- cc-featureSkill
- cc-fixSkill
- cc-pagespeedSkill
- cc-refactorSkill
- cc-reviewSkill
- cc-spec-mutationSkill
- cc-tdd-cycleSkill
- cc-test-planSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commitSkill
- conductor-setupSkill
- councilSkill
- database-migrationsSkill
- django-ormSkill
- django-testingSkill
- django-uvSkill
- drizzle-schema-architectSkill
- evaluationSkill
- fastapi-pydantic-strictSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- jpa-nplusone-detectorSkill
- jpa-postgresSkill
- laravel-specialistSkill
- livewire-alpine-bridgeSkill
- multi-agent-orchestrationSkill
- nextjs-typescriptSkill
- openspecSkill
- pagespeed-insightsSkill
- pagespeed-perfSkill
- php-proSkill
- python-django-stackSkill
- python-fastapi-stackSkill
- pythonSkill
- rust-asyncSkill
- rust-engineeringSkill
- rust-sqlxSkill
- security-ai-llmSkill
- security-blue-teamSkill
- security-cloudSkill
- security-cryptoSkill
- security-exploit-devSkill
- security-grcSkill
- security-incident-responseSkill
- security-log-analysisSkill
- security-malware-analysisSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
27 rules. About 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈19
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
If multiple interpretations exist, present them — don't pick silently.
- Distinctive: line 14
If a simpler approach exists, say so.
- Distinctive: line 15
If something is unclear, stop.
- Distinctive: line 21
No features beyond what was asked.
- Distinctive: line 22
No abstractions for single-use code.
- Distinctive: line 24
No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- Distinctive: line 25
If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
- Distinctive: line 27
Ask: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
- Distinctive: line 33
Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Distinctive: line 34
Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Distinctive: line 36
If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it — don't delete it.
- Very specific: line 37
Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Distinctive: line 38
Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
- Distinctive: line 63
Do not build features, abstractions, or "flexibility" that is not explicitly requested.
- Very specific: line 70
Prefer the language's standard library over third-party packages.
- Distinctive: line 79
Prefer editing over rewriting whole files.
- Distinctive: line 80
Do not re-read files you have already read unless the file may have changed.
- Distinctive: line 82
Test your code before declaring done.
- Distinctive: line 83
No sycophantic openers or closing fluff.
- Distinctive: line 84
Keep solutions simple and direct.
- Distinctive: line 89
If the task type differs from the previous one, execute "/clear" before starting.
- Very specific: line 95
Do NOT use npx cc-codeconductor for local testing.
- Very specific: line 119
Use graphify path "<A>" "<B>" for relationships.
- Very specific: line 120
Use graphify explain "<concept>" for focused concepts.
- Very specific: line 121
If graphify-out/wiki/index.md exists, use it for broad navigation.
- Very specific: line 122
Read graphify-out/GRAPH_REPORT.md only for broad architecture review.
- Very specific: line 123
After modifying code, run graphify update .
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CodeConductor — Agent Configuration
Behavioral Discipline
These guidelines reduce common LLM coding mistakes. They bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them — don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it — don't delete it.
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It)
Do not build features, abstractions, or "flexibility" that is not explicitly requested. If the user asks for a function, write a function — not a class hierarchy. If they ask for a string, return a string — not a Result type with 15 error codes. Every line you write must solve a problem that exists now.
Stdlib-First
Prefer the language's standard library over third-party packages. Before adding
a dependency, ask: "Does node:fs, node:path, node:crypto, or a built-in
module solve this?" If yes, use it. Every external dependency introduces
maintenance burden, supply-chain risk, and version conflicts.
Approach
- Think before acting. Read existing files before writing code.
- Be concise in output but thorough in reasoning.
- Prefer editing over rewriting whole files.
- Do not re-read files you have already read unless the file may have changed.
- Skip files over 100KB unless explicitly required.
- Test your code before declaring done.
- No sycophantic openers or closing fluff.
- Keep solutions simple and direct.
- User instructions always override this file.
Context Budget
- If the task type differs from the previous one, execute "/clear" before starting.
- Delegate verbose operations to sub-agents.
Local Development Execution Rule
Do NOT use npx cc-codeconductor for local testing. Use bun run dev instead
to test all current flow before publishing version v1.0.0 to npm.
Production (npx) | Local development (bun run dev) |
npx cc-codeconductor seo audit --url … | bun run dev seo audit --url … |
npx cc-codeconductor goal "…" | bun run dev goal "…" |
npx cc-codeconductor ccep parse … | bun run dev ccep parse … |
Skills
Authorized security work uses /cc-security plus the matching
.claude/skills/security-* skill (for example .claude/skills/security-web/SKILL.md).
The OWASP application-security skill remains .claude/skills/security/SKILL.md.
graphify
This project has a knowledge graph at graphify-out/ with god nodes, community structure, and cross-file relationships.
Rules:
- For codebase questions, first run
graphify query "<question>"when graphify-out/graph.json exists. - Use
graphify path "<A>" "<B>"for relationships. - Use
graphify explain "<concept>"for focused concepts. - If graphify-out/wiki/index.md exists, use it for broad navigation.
- Read graphify-out/GRAPH_REPORT.md only for broad architecture review.
- After modifying code, run
graphify update .to keep the graph current.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

