agentleFS
lgzarturolgzarturo/codeconductor/.agents/skills/security-exploit-dev/SKILL.md

security-exploit-dev

Skill0 starsChanged 25 days agoMITView on GitHub

Understand how a confirmed vulnerability in an owned system is triggered so you can patch and test it. This is not exploit development for offense. No payloads, malware, or attack procedures.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill only with explicit written authorization for a named scope (systems, environments, and time window).

    line 11
  2. Distinctive:

    Write a regression test that fails before the fix and passes after

    line 21
  3. Distinctive:

    Prefer sanitizers, type systems, and least-privilege patches

    line 22
  4. Distinctive:

    Stop and refuse if the user asks for a working exploit, PoC payload, or bypass kit

    line 23
  5. Distinctive:

    Write exploits, exploit PoCs, shellcode, or weaponized requests

    line 27
  6. Distinctive:

    Document step-by-step attack procedures against any system

    line 28
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not produce exploit payloads, malware, or attack procedures.

    line 31

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Defensive Exploit Analysis (Authorized)

Authorization

Use this skill only with explicit written authorization for a named scope (systems, environments, and time window). If authorization is missing, expired, or the request is for someone else's systems, stop.

This skill is defensive and owner-authorized. It does not authorize offensive cyber operations.

Do

  • Describe the bug class (e.g. missing authz) at a design level
  • Write a regression test that fails before the fix and passes after
  • Prefer sanitizers, type systems, and least-privilege patches
  • Stop and refuse if the user asks for a working exploit, PoC payload, or bypass kit

Do not

  • Write exploits, exploit PoCs, shellcode, or weaponized requests
  • Document step-by-step attack procedures against any system
  • Help with CTF flags, cracking, or unauthorized access
  • Do not produce exploit payloads, malware, or attack procedures.

How to Use

Load this skill from /cc-security when the Task Card domain is security-exploit-dev. Example prompts:

  • We confirmed IDOR on /invoices/:id in our app. Help design the authz check and a RED test — no exploit.
  • Turn this crash report from our fuzzer into a defensive patch and a regression test.

Integration

  • Workflow: /cc-security (CCEP command security)
  • Existing OWASP application-security skill remains security (not this id)
  • High-risk changes still require security-reviewer

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.