verify
Skill5 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Exercise a change end to end in the running application (hit the route, run the command, click through the page) and report what actually happened. Use after tests pass, when a change needs proving in the real app, or when another skill's build step ends.
188 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Doist/todoist-aitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- udecode/better-convextheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- pytorch/heliontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- amir20/dozzletheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Doist/todoist-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use instinct-export, instinct-import and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-export
Export instincts from project/global scope to a file
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-import
Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope
Also in 3 projects that use this
AviadPSkillrisk-assess
Assess the risk and blast radius of a proposed code change before implementing it. Evaluates CI impact, framework-wide vs localized scope, rollback path, and identifies blindspots. Use when user says "what's the risk", "is this safe", "assess the impact", "risk assess", "blast radius", or before applying framework-wide or CI-affecting changes. Do NOT use for code quality review (use code-quality) or plan validation (use design-validator).
Also in 3 projects that use this
diego-tobalinaSkillbuild-fix
Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.
Also in 6 projects that use this
AaravChadhaSkillsecure
Security review with a confidence gate - a finding exists only with a concrete exploit scenario and a high/medium/low confidence rating; everything else goes to a worth-hardening list, never inflated. Sweeps five surfaces: auth gates, secrets hygiene, injection and unsafe sinks, unsafe deserialization/crypto/transport, and LLM tool-use trust boundaries. Reports only, never fixes. Use when the user asks for a security review or to check vulnerabilities, secrets, or auth.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ArvorCoSkillspecify
Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.
Also in 10 projects that use this
- +1 more from TheKREATORS
Other versions188 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 188
- react/react★ 252ksame name
- facebook/react★ 252ksame name
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- oven-sh/bun★ 97ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services-plugins★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/claude-quickstarts★ 19ksame name
- NVIDIA-NeMo/Speech★ 19ksame name
178 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architecture-satisfactionSkill
- autopilotSkill
- browser-testSkill
- chatter-scoutSkill
- closeoutSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- code-smells-auditSkill
- commitSkill
- dependency-auditSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- fix-ci-failuresSkill
- fix-github-issuesSkill
- fix-nightwatch-issuesSkill
- fix-posthog-issuesSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- harness-toolsSkill
- housekeeperSkill
- implementSkill
- implement-specSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- laravel-herd-worktreesSkill
- panelSkill
- prototypeSkill
- prSkill
- prune-testsSkill
- releaseSkill
- repository-cleanupSkill
- researchSkill
- resolve-review-commentsSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- retroSkill
- run-afterSkill
- scratch-cleanupSkill
- scratch-statusSkill
- setupSkill
- sweepSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triage-github-prSkill
- triageSkill
- ui-designSkill
- upgrade-planSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- which-skillSkill
- wizardSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Verify against local/dev: never run mutating flows against a real environment's data without explicit approval.
- Distinctive: line 24
Leave no residue: throwaway records created during verification get cleaned up, or created under an obviously-fake identity the seeds …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Verify
Tests passing is not the finish line. Exercise the actual flow once, in the running application, and report what you observed: never what should happen.
Process
- Pick the flow the change owns. The route a user would hit, the command an operator would run, the job the system would dispatch, the Filament/Livewire page a back-office user would open. Select a small scenario that can expose the changed behavior: grouped or aggregated UI needs multiple related records with distinct values; interactive state needs the action and its reversal (for example expand, collapse, expand), checking controls and content agree each time. Use existing suitable records or isolated fixtures under the guardrails below. Keep the pass focused on the change, not a broad test suite.
- Run it for real.
- HTTP / UI: load the URL the app is already served at. For a Laravel app on Herd that is the main checkout's
https://<dir>.test, or for a worktree theurlits bootstrap'sherd workspaceprinted (herd workspaces --jsonlists it again). Use the project's browser tooling (agent-browser, Boost'sbrowser-logs) to load the page, perform the action, and screenshot the result. A Pest browser test, including one pointed at127.0.0.1, is a test run, not this step. Ifagent-browserfails withERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALIDafterherd secure, close and reopen the browser session so Chromium reloads the trust store; if a dev toolbar (such as Laravel Debugbar) covers a click target, collapse or disable it rather than forcing the click. - Console: run the artisan command with realistic arguments.
- Jobs / listeners: dispatch through the real path (
dispatchSyncor trigger the event), then check the side effect where it lands, database rows, storage, logs.
- HTTP / UI: load the URL the app is already served at. For a Laravel app on Herd that is the main checkout's
- Check the seams the tests can't see. Before driving the flow, watch them under
Monitorwhere available:tail -f storage/logs/laravel.log | grep --line-buffered -E 'ERROR|CRITICAL|Exception', plusphp artisan queue:workwhen a queued job is involved, so each error arrives tied to the action that caused it. Otherwise read the log tail after each action. Look for browser console errors, the Laravel log (storage/logs/or Boost'sread-log-entries/last-error), a queue that needed a running worker, an unbuilt frontend (a Vite manifest error means runnpm run build, not that the change is broken).- Calculated reports: for one nontrivial record, reconcile detail rows, totals, badges/status, units, and the selected period against an independent worked example or source records. When adjacent values intentionally use different periods or populations, confirm the UI makes that difference explicit. Record the scenario and observed values; an unexplained mismatch fails verification.
- Report faithfully. What you did, what you saw (status codes, redirects, rendered state, rows written), and anything that surprised you: with the evidence. If a step couldn't be exercised (needs credentials, a webhook, a human), say so plainly instead of marking it verified. List each screenshot's path, so a PR opened later can embed it. Start each step's line with ✅ worked as expected, ❌ broke, or ⚠️ surprised you or could not be exercised.
Guardrails
- Verify against local/dev: never run mutating flows against a real environment's data without explicit approval.
- Leave no residue: throwaway records created during verification get cleaned up, or created under an obviously-fake identity the seeds already use.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

