agentleFS
leekleek/agent-skills/skills/wizard/SKILL.md

wizard

Skill5 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Generate an interactive bash wizard that walks a human through steps only they can perform. Use when provisioning infrastructure, creating credentials or CI secrets in a third-party dashboard, or running a one-off migration or cutover. For steps the agent can perform itself, perform them.

  • Reads credentials

170 other projects use a version of this, 145 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, writing-beats and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 42 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-beats

    Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.

    Also in 56 projects that use this

  • RoentekSkill

    loop-me

    Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

    Also in 49 projects that use this

  • ryotaroh180105Skill

    claude-handoff

    Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.

    Also in 41 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-shape

    Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.

    Also in 54 projects that use this

  • simo97Skill

    migrate-to-shoehorn

    Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace `as` in tests, or needs partial test data.

    Also in 47 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Lesani

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 1 is common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 1

    Common

    Most of the 154 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Done when: every stage traces to concrete instructions a stranger could follow.

    line 34
  2. Very specific:

    Done when: every value from step 1 has an ask (carrying its default, where step 1 found one), a write_env, and (where CI needs it) a …

    line 42

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 154 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Wizard

A wizard is a bash script that walks a human, stage by stage, through a manual procedure that is tedious to do by hand and tedious to re-explain to an agent every time. It opens each URL, says exactly what to click and copy, captures the values, writes them where they belong (.env, GitHub secrets), confirms at every stage, and shows how many stages remain. It might configure third-party services, run a one-off migration, or move the project from one state to another.

The UX is already solved by template.sh: stage-by-stage progress, confirmation gates, cross-platform URL opening (including WSL), hidden secret entry, idempotent, atomic .env upserts (quoted so dotenv readers and source read back the exact value, the file kept owner-only, a line it cannot read back left as is), gh secret / gh variable writes, and a closing summary. Your job is only to scope the procedure and author its stages. The library above the STAGES marker is identical in every wizard; that consistency is the point: never hand-edit it.

A wizard is ephemeral by default: built for one run, saved under .scratch/ or scripts/, deleted when the job is done. Commit it only when the user wants a repeatable setup path that lives in the repo.

Process

1. Scope the procedure

Work out every manual step the human must take and every value captured along the way. Read the repo first, don't ask cold:

  • For setup: .env, .env.example, .env.*, README, docker-compose*, framework config (in Laravel, every env('X') call under config/ is a value the wizard may need to produce), and .github/workflows/* (every secrets.* / vars.* reference is a value the wizard must produce).
  • For a migration or transition: the current state, the target state, and the irreversible actions between them.

For each non-secret value, also look for what you already know or can derive: the repo name from git remote, the app name or URL from config, a region or project ID from infra files, a non-placeholder value in .env.example, a value the user said earlier in the conversation, or a conventional default (us-east-1, main). That becomes the value's default, so the human confirms it with Enter instead of retyping it.

Then show the user the ordered list of stages and the values each produces, with any defaults, and confirm: they may add, drop, or reorder.

Done when: every stage is named in order, and for each captured value you know (a) where the human gets it, (b) where it is written (.env, a GitHub secret, both, or nowhere; some stages are pure actions), (c) whether it is secret (hidden entry) or public, and (d) its default, if you know or can derive one.

2. Map each stage's journey

For each stage, write the precise path a human follows: which URL to open, what to do there, where a value is shown, which variable it fills: e.g. "Dashboard → Developers → API keys → Reveal test key → copy". Where you do not know the current UI or the exact command, say so and ask the user or check the docs (the research skill, where available). A step you are not sure exists is a question, not a stage.

Done when: every stage traces to concrete instructions a stranger could follow.

3. Author the wizard

Copy template.sh to the target path. Replace the example stage with one stage per step, in dependency order. Use the library helpers: stage, say/step, open_url, ask/ask_secret, write_env, set_secret/set_var, pause/confirm. Set TOTAL_STAGES to the number of stages you wrote. Keep every stage inside run_wizard and leave the file's last line as is, so bash parses the whole script before the first prompt.

Hold the bar the template sets: pass every known default as ask's third argument (ask APP_URL "App URL:" "https://staging.example.com"), open the URL before asking for its value, ask_secret for anything secret, write_env every persisted value, set_secret only the values CI actually needs, and confirm before any irreversible action. Never put a secret in the script as a default: ask_secret takes none, and re-runs already offer the saved .env value. Each stage clears the screen so only the current step is visible: keep a stage to one focused task so nothing the human needs scrolls away. The library above the marker stays untouched.

Done when: every value from step 1 has an ask (carrying its default, where step 1 found one), a write_env, and (where CI needs it) a set_secret whose name exactly matches a secrets.* reference in a workflow.

4. Verify and hand off

  • bash -n <script>; run shellcheck if available.
  • chmod +x <script>.
  • Trace it statically rather than running it: it opens browsers and blocks on human input. Check the step 3 criterion line by line.
  • Tell the user how to run it. If it is a repeatable setup path, commit it and link it from the README so the next person runs the script instead of asking an agent.

Done when: the script parses, is executable, and the user has the one command that starts it.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.