writing-editorial
Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use whenever drafting or revising an email, a Slack message, a decision request, a follow-up, or a summary for a PO, manager, C-level, or customer, in German or English (Mail schreiben, Slack-Nachricht, Zusammenfassung, Executive Summary, Management-Update). Use it even for a two-line mail or ping; it carries the point-context-ask structure, tone rules, and golden examples. Not for marketing copy, product status or roadmaps, PRs, or commits.
In this repository47 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- api-designSkill
- backend-craftSkill
- meilisearchSkill
- design-coreSkill
- design-datavizSkill
- design-flowsSkill
- design-formsSkill
- design-product-uiSkill
- design-researchSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-slidesSkill
- design-systemsSkill
- design-webSkill
- agent-syncSkill
- build-autonomous-agentsSkill
- coding-disciplineSkill
- completion-gateSkill
- deliver-dependency-upgradesSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- grill-harness-with-docsSkill
- learn-agentic-engineeringSkill
- pnpmSkill
- scaffold-harnessSkill
- scaffold-monorepoSkill
- shift-left-securitySkill
- start-gateSkill
- update-harnessSkill
- write-a-skillSkill
- frontend-craftSkill
- ansible-automationSkill
- gitea-actionsSkill
- gitea-teaSkill
- manage-infrastructure-as-codeSkill
- multi-stage-dockerfileSkill
- secure-linux-web-hostingSkill
- integrate-product-complianceSkill
- plain-numbersSkill
- product-craftSkill
- run-product-engineeringSkill
- playwright-best-practicesSkill
- testing-strategiesSkill
- writing-coreSkill
- writing-engineeringSkill
- writing-marketingSkill
- writing-productSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 30
Default order: observation, meaning, implication, recommendation, next step.
- Distinctive: line 45
If the file is missing (this skill was installed alone), check the artifact's checklist in its reference by hand.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Editorial
Move a relationship or a decision forward with the least reading effort. Not
for marketing campaigns or web copy (writing-marketing), product
status or roadmaps (writing-product), or PRs and commits
(writing-engineering), because those formats have different jobs.
Shared contract
Apply writing-core when it is installed; in short: purpose before
prose, one primary reader change, direct and specific language, no defensive
explanation, no invented facts, idiomatic target language (US English by
default, native German, never translated).
Route
- Email (personal, business, request, follow-up, decline, escalation):
read
references/emails.md. - Slack: read
references/slack.md. - PO, management, C-level, or customer summary: read
references/summaries.md.
Communication model
Default order: observation, meaning, implication, recommendation, next step. For sensitive messages keep observation and inference visibly apart, because a reader who feels judged stops reading the facts.
Compression
Cut a detail only when it does not change decision, risk, timing, cost, ownership, customer impact, reversibility, or uncertainty. Executive writing is decision compression, not just a shorter technical text.
Gate
From this skill's directory, run
python3 ../writing-core/scripts/quality_gate.py --artifact <type>
--lang <de|en> FILE with type one of business_email|slack|po_summary|executive_summary.
If the file is missing (this skill was installed alone), check the
artifact's checklist in its reference by hand. Fix every error; judge each
warning, because warnings are heuristics, not rules.
Done when
The reader knows what matters and what happens next, who does it, and by when, without reconstructing it from background.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

