agentleFS
ldaumeldaume/agentic-engineering-harness/skills/backend/api-design/SKILL.md

api-design

Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Designs and reviews REST, GraphQL, and internal APIs with explicit contracts, validation, errors, pagination, versioning, documentation, auth, and compatibility. Use when creating endpoints, changing API contracts, writing OpenAPI docs, reviewing GraphQL schemas, or refactoring service boundaries.

191 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use db-design, everything-claude-code and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • yuexueyuSkill

    db-design

    数据库工程师技能 - Schema设计、索引优化、并发安全、数据库审计。当你涉及数据库表/字段/索引/SQL/迁移/MCP数据库操作、建表改表、写查询时必须使用此技能。即使用户只是说"加个字段"或"查下数据",也应触发。

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • InfopibeSkill

    everything-claude-code

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • mryeastcodeSkill

    everything-claude-code-conventions

    Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • tpavanipradeepSkill

    nextjs-turbopack

    Next.js 16+ and Turbopack — incremental bundling, FS caching, dev speed, and when to use Turbopack vs webpack.

    Also in 15 projects that use this

  • Indium-AI-LabsSkill

    data-pipeline-design

    Design batch or incremental ETL and ELT pipelines and warehouse models: grain, partitioning, idempotent loads, late-arriving data, data quality tests, PII controls, and cost monitoring, before building them. Use when adding or changing a dbt model, warehouse table, scheduled transformation, or ingestion job. Not for transactional schema design (use the database-design skill) or event-sourced stores (use the event-sourcing-architecture skill).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • thejordanleopoldSkill

    third-party-integration

    Use when integrating with external APIs, payment processors (Stripe), webhooks, or third-party services. Use when implementing API clients with authentication and rate limiting, handling webhooks with signature verification and idempotency, writing contract tests for external services, or isolating third-party dependencies behind adapters. Triggers: \"Stripe\", \"payment integration\", \"webhook\", \"third-party API\", \"external service\", \"API client\", \"integrate with\", \"signature verification\", \"idempotency key\".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 165 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 14

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this for API contracts that other code, users, or services depend on.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Before changing an API:

    line 12
  3. Distinctive:

    Read existing routes, schemas, OpenAPI/GraphQL docs, clients, tests, and auth rules.

    line 14
  4. Distinctive:

    Treat compatibility as a product constraint.

    line 20
  5. Distinctive:

    If documentation is missing, add the smallest useful contract near the existing source of truth.

    line 21
  6. Distinctive:

    Read every module the contract touches before drafting it, not after the first draft.

    line 26
  7. Distinctive:

    Use machine-readable error codes plus human-readable messages.

    line 39
  8. Distinctive:

    Keep outcomes distinct when their causes differ.

    line 40
  9. Distinctive:

    Keep auth and ownership checks at the strongest available boundary.

    line 44
  10. Very specific:

    Keep idempotency clear for create/update/retry paths.

    line 46
  11. Distinctive:

    Avoid leaking provider errors or internal stack details.

    line 47
  12. Distinctive:

    Use resources and actions consistently.

    line 51
  13. Distinctive:

    Keep destructive operations explicit.

    line 53
  14. Distinctive:

    Use versioning when breaking changes cannot be coordinated.

    line 55
  15. Distinctive:

    Avoid resolver waterfalls.

    line 61

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 165 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

API Design

Use this for API contracts that other code, users, or services depend on.

Project Fit Check

Before changing an API:

  1. Read existing routes, schemas, OpenAPI/GraphQL docs, clients, tests, and auth rules.
  2. Identify consumers: UI, external users, workers, webhooks, integrations, or internal packages.
  3. Preserve existing naming, error shape, pagination style, and versioning policy unless the task is to change them.
  4. Treat compatibility as a product constraint.
  5. If documentation is missing, add the smallest useful contract near the existing source of truth.

Contract Rules

  • Read every module the contract touches before drafting it, not after the first draft. A draft written from an assumed call graph is wrong about the guards, limits, and auth it has to preserve, and the correction costs more than the reading would have.
  • Validate input at the boundary.
  • A field and its replacement do not change places in one release. While a deploy rolls out, both versions of every consumer are live, and a client that deploys on its own schedule reads the old field for longer than that. Add the replacement, answer both, and remove the old field a release later. Removing a role field in the change that introduced roles hid the administration menu from an installation's own administrator, and every request still answered 200.
  • Make response shape stable and documented.
  • Use machine-readable error codes plus human-readable messages.
  • Keep outcomes distinct when their causes differ. A request the system chose not to attempt is not a request that failed. Recording them as one outcome invents a failure, and downstream logic that suppresses retries on failure then suppresses the retry that would have succeeded.
  • Keep auth and ownership checks at the strongest available boundary.
  • Make pagination, filtering, sorting, and limits explicit.
  • Keep idempotency clear for create/update/retry paths.
  • Avoid leaking provider errors or internal stack details.

REST Rules

  • Use resources and actions consistently.
  • Choose status codes deliberately.
  • Keep destructive operations explicit.
  • Support partial failure only when the client can act on it.
  • Use versioning when breaking changes cannot be coordinated.

GraphQL Rules

  • Design schema around consumer needs, not database tables.
  • Keep nullability meaningful.
  • Avoid resolver waterfalls; batch where needed.
  • Make authorization explicit per object or field where sensitivity differs.
  • Deprecate before removing fields.

Verification

  • schema/typecheck for contracts
  • unit tests for validation and errors
  • integration tests for auth, pagination, and persistence
  • client or e2e tests for user-visible flows

Red Flags

  • silent response shape change
  • unbounded list endpoint
  • inconsistent error format
  • auth only in the frontend
  • endpoint mirrors database internals
  • breaking change without migration or version plan

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.