agentleFS
ldaumeldaume/agentic-engineering-harness/skills/backend/meilisearch/SKILL.md

meilisearch

Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Designs, configures, and debugs Meilisearch indexing, search settings, filters, ranking rules, synonyms, typo tolerance, multi-tenant indexes, and reindex/backfill flows. Use when adding Meilisearch, changing search relevance, debugging missing results, tuning facets, or operating search indexes.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈11

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this for search-backed product features and operational search workflows.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Read existing index definitions, sync/backfill jobs, search clients, auth rules, settings, and tests.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep document IDs stable.

    line 24
  4. Distinctive:

    Avoid indexing secrets, private prompts, tokens, or raw sensitive content.

    line 26
  5. Distinctive:

    Treat settings changes as migrations: apply consistently and verify.

    line 28
  6. Distinctive:

    Use filters/facets for structured constraints.

    line 33
  7. Distinctive:

    Add synonyms only when they reflect real domain language.

    line 34
  8. Distinctive:

    Test typo tolerance against real queries, not only ideal examples.

    line 35
  9. Distinctive:

    Prefer idempotent indexing jobs.

    line 40
  10. Distinctive:

    search results bypass authorization

    line 55
  11. Distinctive:

    delete path missing from sync

    line 59

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Meilisearch

Use this for search-backed product features and operational search workflows.

Project Fit Check

Before changing search:

  1. Read existing index definitions, sync/backfill jobs, search clients, auth rules, settings, and tests.
  2. Identify whether indexes are global, tenant-scoped, user-scoped, or mixed.
  3. Confirm which fields are searchable, filterable, sortable, displayed, and safe to expose.
  4. Preserve existing relevance policy unless the task is to tune it.
  5. Plan reindexing and rollback before changing settings or document shape.

Index Rules

  • Keep document IDs stable.
  • Store only fields needed for search and display.
  • Avoid indexing secrets, private prompts, tokens, or raw sensitive content.
  • Make tenant/user ownership enforceable before query results reach the user.
  • Treat settings changes as migrations: apply consistently and verify.

Relevance Rules

  • Tune searchable attributes before adding complex ranking hacks.
  • Use filters/facets for structured constraints.
  • Add synonyms only when they reflect real domain language.
  • Test typo tolerance against real queries, not only ideal examples.
  • Record meaningful relevance changes in docs or changelog.

Sync And Backfill

  • Prefer idempotent indexing jobs.
  • Track source record id, index name, version, and last indexed timestamp when operations need observability.
  • Handle deletes and permission changes, not only creates/updates.
  • Batch conservatively and retry safely.

Verification

  • fixture search tests for relevance-critical queries
  • permission tests for tenant/user boundaries
  • backfill smoke test on a small sample
  • manual query check for changed facets or ranking rules

Red Flags

  • search results bypass authorization
  • private fields indexed for convenience
  • settings changed without reindex plan
  • relevance tuned from one anecdotal query
  • delete path missing from sync

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.