agentleFS
kensauruskensaurus/cursor-kenji/skills/audit-performance/SKILL.md

audit-performance

Skill9 starsChanged 42 days agoMITView on GitHub

Audit and fix runtime performance (Core Web Vitals, load priority). Use when "slow page", "LCP/INP/CLS", "fetchpriority", "long tasks", or "bfcache". JS payload → audit-bundle-size. Instant nav → enhance-web-instant-nav. Load limits → test-load.

8 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use marketing-pages, close-spec and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • dzhngSkill

    marketing-pages

    Best-practice rulebook for a marketing site's pages, organized by page class — campaign landers, product pages, programmatic SEO trees, editorial. Use when writing or updating a landing/marketing page, wiring a campaign lander to an attribution identifier, changing site-wide nav/footer links, touching sitemap/robots/agent-readable surfaces, or auditing a public site's indexing, reachability, and conversion setup.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • dzhngSkill

    close-spec

    When a spec under specs/<feature>/ is done shipping (a write-spec build, or any planned task that produced a spec), archive it to specs/done/ and rewrite it from a build-plan into a durable rationale — the why, the principles, the invariants — pointing back to the real code for the how. Use when implementation has landed and the plan no longer matches what shipped, or the user says a feature/spec is finished. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) (the plan this closes) and [review](../review/SKILL.md) (run before closing).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • transitive-bullshitSkill

    compare-screenshots

    Compare screenshots against the intended design, distinguishing approved references from historical baselines. Use for iterative implementation matching, before/after visual review, objective image telemetry, or checking a lone capture for flat, empty, or badly framed content.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • LucasMatuszewskiSkill

    audit-agents

    Audit and maintain agent configuration files (.claude/agents, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, agent-memory). Checks for duplicates, outdated info, naming conflicts, wrong technical facts, and files over 200 lines. Fixes all issues and commits.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • antonio-orionusSkill

    find-state-machines

    Report every implicit state machine in a project, with its states, transitions and flaws.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • rhnfzlSkill

    explore-unknowns

    Walk the user through mapping the unknowns of a task before, during, and after they build it, and hand them a four-quadrant map (settled ground, open decisions, taste, and landmines) they keep. Reach for this eagerly whenever a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the codebase or domain is unfamiliar, the user will "know it when they see it", a reference implementation must be understood before porting, a build-queue or architecture-changing task is about to start, a mid-build deviation needs capturing, or a finished change needs buy-in or verified understanding before merge. Trigger even when the skill is not named: "do a blindspot pass", "find my unknown unknowns", "interview me about this change", "brainstorm the approach for a task I am about to build", "help me scope this", "what am I missing here", "plan this before I build", "I know nothing about X in this codebase". When a territory profile is present it reads memory and the graph first and feeds the map into the build pipeline; without one it degrades to a plain general map. Not for trivial or mechanical tasks with clear acceptance criteria, single-fact lookups, pure debugging of a known symptom, or pure code review, those have their own tools. Do not use it to run the build itself; the map is the deliverable and implementation remains a separate task, whether it has not started or is already underway.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +6 more from dzhng

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before optimizing, measure.

    line 38
  2. Distinctive:

    If Sentry performance monitoring is enabled, fetch real production metrics:

    line 42
  3. Distinctive:

    Check for performance-related issues:

    line 66
  4. Distinctive:

    Check official framework docs via Context7:

    line 314

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Performance Audit Skill

Degree of freedom: MIXED — what to optimize [HIGH freedom]; measure-first Sentry/vitals and EXPLAIN [LOW freedom — run exactly].

Audit-and-fix exception. Measure, then optimize. JS payload → audit-bundle-size. Instant navigations → enhance-web-instant-nav. Breaking point → test-load. Timeouts/retries → audit-resilience. When fixing: change only the measured bottleneck and re-measure it; log other slow paths you notice as follow-ups, not fixes. Edit the existing file in place rather than rewriting it. Add a perf test only where the repo already keeps them or the task asks; scratch measurements stay out of the repo.

How to reason

  1. Observe — quote LCP/INP/CLS, p95, or EXPLAIN / N+1 loop (file:line)
  2. Interpret — is the user waiting on bytes, a query, or main-thread work?
  3. Classify — vital-miss / N+1 / missing-index / bundle / image / re-render
  4. Severity — poor LCP/INP or p95 >> target on a live path = Critical

Worked example

Observe: Sentry p95 /users = 2.3s; handler findAll then per-user Order.findByUserId (app/api/users/route.ts:31). Interpret: N+1; TTFB/LCP suffer on that page. Classify: N+1. Severity: Critical (p95 far over 200ms). Finding: /users | N+1 | eager-load orders | then re-measure

Step 0: Gather Performance Data [LOW freedom — run exactly]

Before optimizing, measure. Collect data from multiple sources.

Production Data (Sentry)

If Sentry performance monitoring is enabled, fetch real production metrics:

sentry:search_events
{
 "organizationSlug": "<ORG_SLUG>",
 "projectSlug": "<PROJECT_SLUG>",
 "regionUrl": "<REGION_URL>",
 "query": "slowest transactions by p95 duration in last 7 days",
 "limit": 20
}
sentry:search_events
{
 "organizationSlug": "<ORG_SLUG>",
 "projectSlug": "<PROJECT_SLUG>",
 "regionUrl": "<REGION_URL>",
 "query": "web vitals LCP INP CLS performance scores in last 7 days",
 "limit": 20
}

Check for performance-related issues:

sentry:search_issues
{
 "organizationSlug": "<ORG_SLUG>",
 "projectSlugOrId": "<PROJECT_SLUG>",
 "regionUrl": "<REGION_URL>",
 "query": "performance issues slow queries N+1 in last 30 days",
 "limit": 20
}

Research Current Benchmarks

Fetch current performance targets:

firecrawl:firecrawl_search
{
 "query": "web vitals thresholds good score <current year>",
 "limit": 3,
 "sources": [{ "type": "web" }]
}

Field Data (source of truth) [LOW freedom — run exactly]

Lab (Lighthouse) is for diagnosis; field decides pass/fail.

  1. CrUX / PageSpeed Insights field tab for the origin and top 5 URLs by traffic — record p75 LCP / INP / CLS (mobile first).
  2. web-vitals/attribution in the app (not the base build): it names the LCP element, the INP interaction target, and the CLS-shifting node.
  3. Lighthouse CI with a budget.json (see references/loading-priority-2026.md §Budgets). Fail the PR on regression, not on absolute score.

Record all three in the report's "Production Metrics" block before touching code.

Verification protocol [LOW freedom — run exactly]

# Field (source of truth): CrUX / PSI field tab → p75 LCP, INP, CLS
# Lab, repeatable, budgeted:
npx @lhci/cli autorun --config=lighthouserc.json
# Early Hints present?
curl -sv https://example.com/ 2>&1 | grep -E "< HTTP/.* 103"
# Speculation: DevTools → Application → Speculative loads
# bfcache:     DevTools → Application → Back/forward cache → Test
# LCP element: web-vitals/attribution → onLCP(({attribution}) => attribution.element)

Performance Targets

Core Web Vitals

MetricGoodNeeds WorkPoor
LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)<2.5s2.5-4s>4s
INP (Interaction to Next Paint)<200ms200-500ms>500ms
CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)<0.10.1-0.25>0.25

Other Key Metrics

  • TTFB: <800ms field p75 (Google threshold); aim <200ms at the edge
  • FCP: <1.8s
  • Long tasks: none >50ms on the critical interaction path (INP driver)
  • LCP resource load delay: <100ms (gap between TTFB and the LCP image request starting — usually "image not discoverable / not preloaded")
  • bfcache: eligible on every content page (DevTools → Application → Back/forward cache)

Frontend Performance Audit [HIGH freedom]

Bundle Size Analysis

npm run build -- --analyze # framework-specific
npx source-map-explorer 'dist/**/*.js'

Checklist:

  • Total bundle <200KB gzipped
  • No single chunk >100KB gzipped
  • Tree shaking working (no unused exports in bundle)
  • Heavy libraries lazy-loaded (charts, editors, maps)
  • No moment.js (use date-fns or dayjs)
  • No lodash full import (use lodash-es or specific imports)

Code Splitting

  • Route-based splitting (each page loads its own chunk)
  • Component-level splitting for heavy components (lazy() / dynamic())
  • Below-fold content deferred

Image Optimization

  • WebP/AVIF format used (not PNG/JPEG for photos)
  • Images sized appropriately (not serving 4K to mobile)
  • loading="lazy" on below-fold images
  • Responsive srcSet for different screen sizes
  • Image CDN used (Cloudinary, imgix, Vercel Image Optimization)

Loading Priority & Speculation [HIGH freedom on which to apply, LOW freedom on the LCP rules]

Deep syntax: references/loading-priority-2026.md. Instant-nav implementation → enhance-web-instant-nav.

LCP element (find it first with web-vitals/attribution or DevTools → Performance → LCP)

  • LCP image is not loading="lazy" — lazy on the LCP image is an automatic Critical finding
  • LCP image has fetchpriority="high" (Next.js: <Image priority />, which also injects the preload)
  • LCP image is discoverable from HTML — not a CSS background-image, not injected by client JS, not behind a hydration boundary
  • <link rel="preload" as="image" imagesrcset imagesizes> when the LCP image is responsive and not already preloaded by the framework
  • Non-critical images: loading="lazy" decoding="async"; <picture> AVIF → WebP → JPEG fallback

Fonts

  • font-display: swap (or optional for non-brand text); fallback metrics set (size-adjust, ascent-override) so swap causes no CLS — next/font does this automatically, verify it's actually used
  • Preload only the above-fold weight(s); subset to used unicode ranges; self-host

Early Hints (103)

  • Origin/CDN sends 103 Early Hints with preconnect for the image/font CDN and preload for the LCP image + critical CSS. Verify: curl -sv https://site/ 2>&1 | grep -i "< HTTP/.* 103"
  • Node: res.writeEarlyHints({ link: [...] }); otherwise configure at the CDN

Speculation Rules (next-navigation speed)

  • <script type="speculationrules"> present with prefetch document rules at moderate eagerness for in-site links
  • prerender only for high-probability next pages (pagination, "next article", product detail); eagerness moderate/conservative
  • Excluded from speculation: logout, cart/checkout, auth, anything with side effects on GET, URLs with ? unless expects_no_vary_search is set
  • Server ignores side-effects when Sec-Purpose: prefetch;prerender is present; analytics/ads guarded by document.prerendering + prerenderingchange
  • Full implementation → enhance-web-instant-nav

bfcache

  • No unload listeners (use pagehide); no Cache-Control: no-store on HTML; no open WebSocket / IndexedDB transaction at pagehide
  • Verified green in DevTools → Application → Back/forward cache → "Test back/forward cache"

Render strategy (Next.js 16 / React 19)

  • Server Components by default; 'use client' only at interactive leaves
  • Slow data wrapped in <Suspense> so the shell streams; static shell + dynamic holes (cacheComponents / 'use cache') instead of blocking the whole route
  • React Compiler enabled (reactCompiler: true) before any manual memo/useMemo/useCallback — manual memo only where Profiler proves the Compiler missed it

INP (responsiveness)

  • No task >50ms on tap/click/keypress paths; break work with scheduler.yield() (fallback setTimeout(0)) or startTransition
  • No synchronous layout reads (offsetHeight, getBoundingClientRect) inside input handlers
  • content-visibility: auto + contain-intrinsic-size on long off-screen sections
  • Third-party scripts: async/defer, Next <Script strategy="lazyOnload"> (or "worker" via Partytown where safe), consent-gated, facades for embeds (lite-youtube, static map image → iframe on click)

CLS

  • Every <img>, <video>, <iframe>, ad slot has width/height or aspect-ratio
  • Late-arriving UI (banners, toasts, cookie bars) reserves space or overlays — never pushes content

React Performance (if applicable)

  • React Compiler on; manual memo only with Profiler evidence (see Loading Priority & Speculation)
  • No unnecessary re-renders (React DevTools Profiler)
  • Long lists virtualized (react-window, @tanstack/react-virtual)
  • No inline object/array creation in JSX props
  • Context providers scoped narrowly (not wrapping entire app for local state)

CSS Performance

  • No layout thrashing (reads before writes)
  • Animations use transform/opacity (GPU-accelerated)
  • No @import chains (bundled instead)
  • Critical CSS inlined for above-fold content
  • Fonts subset and preloaded (<link rel="preload">)

Backend Performance Audit [HIGH freedom]

Database Queries

N+1 Detection:

// BAD: N+1
const users = await User.findAll();
for (const user of users) {
 const orders = await Order.findByUserId(user.id);
}

// GOOD: eager loading
const users = await User.findAll({ include: [Order] });

Checklist:

  • N+1 queries eliminated (eager loading, joins, batch loading)
  • Indexes on frequently queried columns (WHERE, JOIN, ORDER BY)
  • SELECT only needed columns (no SELECT *)
  • Pagination on all list endpoints
  • Connection pooling configured
  • Slow query logging enabled

Index verification: [LOW freedom — run exactly]

EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = '123';

API Response Optimization

  • Response compression enabled (gzip/brotli)
  • Appropriate cache headers (Cache-Control, ETag)
  • No over-fetching (return only what the client needs)
  • Pagination for list endpoints
  • Response time <200ms for p95

Caching Strategy

LayerToolTTLUse For
BrowserCache-Control headersVariesStatic assets, API responses
CDNVercel/CloudFront/Cloudflare1h-1dStatic pages, images
APIRedis/Memcached5m-1hExpensive queries, computed data
ORMQuery cache1m-5mRepeated identical queries

Network Optimization

  • CDN for static assets
  • HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 enabled
  • Preconnect to critical origins (<link rel="preconnect">)
  • DNS prefetch for third-party domains
  • API calls batched where possible (GraphQL, DataLoader)

Research-Driven Optimization [HIGH freedom]

For specific performance bottlenecks, research current solutions:

firecrawl:firecrawl_search
{
 "query": "<framework> <specific bottleneck> performance optimization <current year>",
 "limit": 5,
 "sources": [{ "type": "web" }]
}

Then deep-read the best result:

firecrawl:firecrawl_scrape
{
 "url": "<best-result-url>",
 "formats": ["markdown"],
 "onlyMainContent": true
}

Check official framework docs via Context7:

context7:resolve-library-id
{
 "libraryName": "<framework>",
 "query": "performance optimization"
}

Quick Wins (Highest Impact, Lowest Effort)

IssueSolutionImpact
LCP image lazy / not prioritizedfetchpriority="high" + preload; remove loading="lazy" from LCPHigh (−300 to −800 ms LCP)
Fast first page, slow secondSpeculation Rules prefetch (moderate)High (next-nav TTFB ≈ 0)
Manual memo everywhereEnable React CompilerHigh (INP; delete redundant memo)
Large bundleCode split routes, lazy load heavy libsHigh
Slow imagesWebP + lazy load + responsiveHigh
No cachingAdd Cache-Control headersHigh
N+1 queriesEager load / batchHigh
Missing indexesAdd database indexesHigh
Unoptimized fontsSubset + preload + font-display:swapMedium
No compressionEnable gzip/brotliMedium
Expensive re-rendersReact Compiler first; manual memo only with Profiler evidenceMedium
Layout shiftsSet explicit width/height on images/embedsMedium

Self-critique before applying fixes [LOW freedom — do not skip]

  1. Evidenced — a measured vital, p95, or EXPLAIN, not "this looks slow"
  2. Reproducible — same path still exceeds the target table
  3. Severity justified — Critical = poor vital or live-path p95
  4. Right owner — JS payload → audit-bundle-size; breaking point → test-load; timeouts → audit-resilience
  5. No-false-safety — no memo/useMemo without a measured re-render; measure again after the fix
  6. LCP named — prove which element is LCP before recommending image fixes (no attribution data = guess, not audit)

Output: Performance Audit Report

## Performance Audit: [Project Name]

### Production Metrics (from Sentry)
- LCP: [value] — [good/needs work/poor]
- INP: [value] — [good/needs work/poor]
- CLS: [value] — [good/needs work/poor]
- Slowest transactions: [list with p95 times]

### Critical Issues (fix immediately)
| # | Area | Issue | Impact | Fix |
|---|------|-------|--------|-----|
| 1 | DB | N+1 on /users endpoint | p95 = 2.3s | Eager load orders relation |

### Optimizations (prioritized)
| # | Area | Issue | Impact | Effort | Fix |
|---|------|-------|--------|--------|-----|
| 1 | FE | Bundle 450KB gzipped | High | Low | Code split routes |

### Already Optimized
- [list of performance areas that are well-implemented]

### Monitoring Recommendations
- [what to add to track performance over time]

### Research Sources
- [URL] — [what optimization pattern it provided]

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.