skill-creator
Skill1 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Generate new agent skills from a workflow description: SKILL.md with frontmatter, workflow, examples, and eval cases. Use when creating from a description. Do NOT use for modifying existing skills.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 183 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 48
Ask the user for a description of the workflow.
- Very specific: line 79
Use the template in templates/skill-template.md.
- Very specific: line 85
Keep total ≤250 lines. If content exceeds, move detail to references/
- Very specific: line 89
Create 7 eval cases in evals/:
- Very specific: line 97
All cases must validate against scripts/eval/schema.json.
- Distinctive: line 113
Run these checks and report results to the user:
- Very specific: line 122
All must pass before presenting the result.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 183 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill Creator
Generate production-ready skills from descriptions.
→ See guides/WORKFLOW-GUIDE.md for the complete input-to-output workflow.
→ See guides/EVAL-CASES-GUIDE.md for eval case format and quality criteria.
Creates a complete skill directory with SKILL.md, eval cases, and progressive disclosure structure. The generated skill is always tier draft — human review required before promotion to action-allowed.
When to Use
- Need a new skill and don't want to write SKILL.md from scratch
- Have a clear description of the workflow the skill should execute
- Want a skill with eval cases included from the start
- Rapid prototyping of new capabilities
Output Contract
| Artifact | Format | Location | Quality Criteria |
| New skill directory | SKILL.md (Markdown) + eval cases (JSONL) + optional references | skills/<skill-name>/ | Description passes all 6 Check 15 criteria (verb-led, triggers front-loaded, anti-trigger, ≤200 chars, 3+ triggers, no jargon), SKILL.md ≤250 lines, 7 eval cases (3 trigger + 2 golden + 2 adversarial), all pass skill-lint and eval runners, tier = draft |
When NOT to Use
- Modifying an existing skill (use
skill-improver) - One-off tasks that won't be reused as skills
- Creating skills for trivial workflows (better to write manually)
Workflow
Step 1: Collect Description
Ask the user for a description of the workflow. Collect:
- What the skill does (one sentence, verb-led, ≤200 chars)
- Trigger keywords (must appear in first 60 chars of description)
- Non-triggers (must produce a "Do NOT use for..." anti-trigger clause)
- Trigger scenarios (2-3 concrete examples of when to use)
- Workflow steps (3-5 ordered steps)
- Audience (all-engineers, frontend, backend, etc.)
- Allowed tools (Read, Bash, Write, Edit)
The generated description MUST pass all 6 quality criteria (Check 15):
- ✅ Verb-led opening (Build, Fix, Design, etc.)
- ✅ Trigger keywords in first 60 chars
- ✅ Anti-trigger clause (Do NOT use for...)
- ✅ ≤200 chars
- ✅ 3+ distinct trigger keywords
- ✅ No internal jargon (no references to other skills)
Step 2: Generate Skill Name
Derive name from the description:
| Description | Generated Name |
| "Review Docker security configs" | docker-security-review |
| "Generate commit messages from diffs" | commit-message-generator |
| "Check API responses for schema compliance" | api-schema-validator |
Rules: kebab-case, gerund form preferred, no vendor prefixes, no generic names.
Step 3: Generate SKILL.md
Use the template in templates/skill-template.md. Fill in:
- Frontmatter YAML (name, description, version 1.0.0, license MIT, compatibility all, allowed-tools from input, tier draft)
- Description must pass all 6 criteria: verb-led, trigger keywords front-loaded, anti-trigger clause, ≤200 chars, 3+ distinct triggers, no internal jargon
- Body: When to Use, When NOT to Use, Workflow, Examples, Output Format
- Keep total ≤250 lines. If content exceeds, move detail to
references/
Step 4: Generate Eval Cases
Create 7 eval cases in evals/:
| File | Cases | Purpose |
trigger.jsonl | 2 positive, 1 negative | Verify correct activation |
golden.jsonl | 2 with rubric | Verify output quality |
adversarial.jsonl | 1 rephrase, 1 boundary | Verify trigger robustness |
All cases must validate against scripts/eval/schema.json.
Step 5: Create Directory Structure
skills/<skill-name>/
├── SKILL.md
├── evals/
│ ├── trigger.jsonl
│ ├── golden.jsonl
│ └── adversarial.jsonl
└── references/ (optional — add if SKILL.md > 200 lines)Step 6: Verify
Run these checks and report results to the user:
bash scripts/skill-lint.sh
bash scripts/eval/run-evals.sh --skill <name>
bash scripts/eval/run-golden.sh --skill <name>
bash scripts/eval/run-adversarial.sh --skill <name>All must pass before presenting the result. skill-lint.sh includes Check 15 (description quality) — if the generated description fails any of the 6 criteria, fix it before proceeding.
Step 7: Present to User
Output summary:
✅ Created skill: <name>
Path: skills/<name>/
Lines: <N> (≤250 ✅)
Evals: 3 trigger + 2 golden + 2 adversarial
Status: DRAFT — review before action-allowed
→ Ready for review. Need changes?Examples
Input: "A skill that reviews Docker Compose files for security issues. It should check exposed ports, privileged mode, and env variables."
Generated structure:
skills/docker-compose-security/
├── SKILL.md
└── evals/
├── trigger.jsonl
├── golden.jsonl
└── adversarial.jsonltrigger.jsonl:
{"case_id":"trigger_pos_001","type":"trigger_positive","input":"Check this docker-compose.yml for security issues","expected_skill":"docker-compose-security"}
{"case_id":"trigger_pos_002","type":"trigger_positive","input":"Review the Docker Compose security configuration","expected_skill":"docker-compose-security"}
{"case_id":"trigger_neg_001","type":"trigger_negative","input":"Build the Docker image","expected_skill":"docker-compose-security"}Anti-Patterns
- Generating skills without eval cases → "a skill without a test is a hope"
- Using tier action-allowed by default → always start at draft
- Adding vendor prefixes to skill names (claude-, gemini-) → violates Rule 0k
- Creating skills that duplicate existing ones → check skills/ directory first
- Generating SKILL.md > 250 lines → move content to references/
References
skills/skill-creator/templates/skill-template.md— base template for generated skillsscripts/eval/schema.json— eval case schema for validationscripts/skill-lint.sh— linter for generated skillsdocs/EVAL-GUIDE.md— complete eval system documentation (format, tiers, coverage)- Existing skills in
skills/— reference implementations
Other versions188 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 188
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394ksame name
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- steipete/clawdis★ 394ksame name
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394ksame name
- steipete/warelay★ 392ksame name
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 392ksame name
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391ksame name
- anthropics/skills★ 186ksame name
- openai/codex★ 133ksame name
- google-gemini/gemini-cli★ 109ksame name
178 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use taskflow-inbox-triage, community-led-growth and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AtomicBot-aiSkilltaskflow-inbox-triage
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
seedprodSkillsession-logs
Search and analyze your own session logs (older/parent conversations) using jq.
Also in 18 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillacademy-guide
Stop and check this skill before finishing any reply to a question about how to use Claude or a Claude product — it recommends matching courses, tutorials, and use cases from Claude Academy (academy.claude.com), Anthropic's learning hub. Trigger on: "how do I", "how can I", "getting started with", "what can Claude do", "teach me", "learn to use"; questions about artifacts, projects, skills, plugins, connectors, MCP; requests about rolling Claude out to a team, class, or organization; and any ask for training materials, onboarding content, or learning resources. Use it when the user is learning how to use a feature or product — not when they are mid-task and just want the task done. This skill composes with other skills: after consulting product documentation to answer how a Claude feature works, also check here for a matching course or tutorial — a docs-grounded answer and an Academy recommendation belong together. Only recommend on a strong match; never invent Academy content.
Also in 5 projects that use this
ArogyaReddySkillskill-share
A skill that creates new Claude skills and automatically shares them on Slack using Rube for seamless team collaboration and skill discovery.
Also in 23 projects that use this
- +3 more from nicepkg
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- templates/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adapt-skillSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- architecture-analysisSkill
- audit-skillSkill
- backend-api-masterySkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- clarify-skillSkill
- cli-toolsSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- critique-skillSkill
- customize-opencodeSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- debugging-three-strikesSkill
- delight-skillSkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- dev-environment-auditSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- engineering-fundamentalsSkill
- frontend-desktopSkill
- frontend-mobileSkill
- frontend-pwaSkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- frontend-webSkill
- fullstack-shippingSkill
- gateSkill
- git-init-and-versioningSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- hard-skillSkill
- idea-refineSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- industrial-brutalist-uiSkill
- interview-meSkill
- minimalist-uiSkill
- multi-agent-orchestrationSkill
- observability-and-instrumentationSkill
- optimize-skillSkill
- output-skillSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- polish-skillSkill
- project-health-checkSkill
- project-metricsSkill
- redesign-skillSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- self-improvementSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- skill-improverSkill
- soft-premium-uiSkill
- source-driven-developmentSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- typeset-skillSkill
- user-onboardingSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

