shipping-and-launch
Skill1 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Prepare production launches with checklists, monitoring, staged rollout, and rollback strategies. Use before any significant deployment. Do NOT use for local development.
- Commits and pushes
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 2 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
2
Common
Most of the 56 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 79
Rules: Every flag has an owner and expiration.
- Common: line 126
Every deployment needs one before it happens:
- Distinctive: line 147
Rule: If you can't verify against the real world, say so.
- Common: line 161
No monitoring or error reporting in production
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 56 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Shipping and Launch
Ship with confidence. Deploy safely: monitoring in place, rollback plan ready, clear success criteria. Every launch should be reversible, observable, and incremental.
When to Use
- Deploying a feature to production for the first time
- Releasing a significant change to users
- Migrating data or infrastructure
- Any deployment that carries risk (all of them)
When NOT to Use
- Local development or prototyping
- Pre-production CI/CD setup (use
ci-cd-and-automation)
Output Contract
| Artifact | Format | Location | Quality Criteria |
| Launch plan + monitoring + rollback | Markdown checklist + monitoring dashboard config + rollback procedure doc | Project docs + monitoring/ or dashboard | Pre-launch checklist complete (code quality, security, performance, infrastructure), feature flags with owner and expiration, staged rollout with canary/gradual steps, rollout thresholds defined (error rate ≤2x baseline, P95 within 50% of baseline), monitoring covers Four Golden Signals (latency, traffic, errors, saturation), rollback plan with trigger/steps/timing, post-launch verification completed, TOOL_GAP reported if production unreachable |
→ See guides/CHECKLIST-GUIDE.md for the complete launch checklist.
→ See guides/ROLLBACK-GUIDE.md for rollback procedures and decision matrix.
Pre-Launch Checklist
Code Quality
- All tests pass (unit, integration, e2e)
- Build succeeds with no warnings
- Lint and type checking pass
- Code reviewed and approved
- Error handling covers expected failure modes
Security
- No secrets in code or version control
- Input validation on all user-facing endpoints
- Auth and authorization checks in place
- Security headers configured (CSP, HSTS, etc.)
- CORS configured to specific origins (not wildcard)
Performance
- Core Web Vitals within "Good" thresholds
- No N+1 queries in critical paths
- Bundle size within budget
- Caching configured for static assets
Infrastructure
- Environment variables set in production
- Database migrations applied
- Logging and error reporting configured
- Health check endpoint exists and responds
Feature Flags
Ship behind feature flags to decouple deployment from release:
1. DEPLOY with flag OFF → Code in production but inactive
2. ENABLE for team/beta → Internal testing in production
3. GRADUAL ROLLOUT → 5% → 25% → 50% → 100%
4. MONITOR at each stage → Watch error rates, performance
5. CLEAN UP → Remove flag after full rolloutRules: Every flag has an owner and expiration. Don't nest flags. Test both states in CI.
Staged Rollout
1. DEPLOY to staging → full test suite + manual smoke test
2. DEPLOY to production (flag OFF) → verify health check
3. ENABLE for team → 24-hour monitoring window
4. CANARY (5%) → compare metrics vs baseline, 24-48h
5. GRADUAL (25% → 50% → 100%) → same monitoring each step
6. FULL rollout → monitor 1 week → clean up flagRollout Thresholds
| Metric | Advance | Hold | Roll back |
| Error rate | Within 10% of baseline | 10-100% above | >2x baseline |
| P95 latency | Within 20% of baseline | 20-50% above | >50% above |
| Client JS errors | No new types | New at <0.1% sessions | New at >0.1% sessions |
When to Roll Back
Roll back immediately if: error rate >2x baseline, P95 latency >50% increase, user-reported spikes, data integrity issues, or security vulnerability discovered.
Monitoring
Per Google SRE Four Golden Signals, monitor these dimensions:
Latency: response time (p50/p95/p99), health check endpoint
Traffic: request volume, active users, concurrent sessions
Errors: error rate (HTTP 5xx, client JS errors), failed requests
Saturation: CPU/memory utilization, DB connection pool, disk, networkPost-Launch Verification (First Hour)
- Health endpoint returns 200
- Error monitoring: no new error types
- Latency dashboard: no regression
- Critical user flow works manually
- Logs flowing and readable
- Rollback mechanism ready
Rollback Plan
Every deployment needs one before it happens:
- Trigger: Error rate >2x, P95 >[X]ms, user reports, data issues
- Steps: Disable flag OR
git revert <commit> && git push→ verify → notify team - Timing: Flag <1min, redeploy <5min, DB rollback <15min
TOOL_GAP: When You Can't Verify Deployment
Inspired by Sub-Zero Skill. After deployment, verification requires real-world access:
| Verdict | Meaning | Action |
| ✅ PASS | Health check 200, metrics normal | Proceed to next stage |
| ❌ FAIL | Health check fails, errors spike | Roll back per plan |
| ⚠️ TOOL_GAP | Can't reach production (no access, no network) | STOP. Report "deploy status unknown." Never fake a win. |
Examples:
- "Deploy succeeded" but can't reach health endpoint → TOOL_GAP
- "Metrics look good" but monitoring dashboard unavailable → TOOL_GAP
- "Users can access" but no real-user monitoring → TOOL_GAP
Rule: If you can't verify against the real world, say so. The absence of errors is not evidence of success.
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
| "It works in staging, it'll work in production" | Production has different data, traffic, edge cases. Monitor. |
| "We don't need feature flags" | Every feature benefits from a kill switch. |
| "Monitoring is overhead" | Not having it means discovering problems from user complaints. |
| "Rolling back is admitting failure" | Shipping broken features is the failure. |
Red Flags
- Deploying without a rollback plan
- No monitoring or error reporting in production
- Big-bang releases (no staging, no canary)
- Feature flags with no expiration or owner
- "It's Friday afternoon, let's ship it"
Verification
Before deploying:
- Pre-launch checklist completed
- Rollback plan documented
- Monitoring dashboards set up
After deploying:
- Health check returns 200
- Error rate is normal
- Critical user flow works
- TOOL_GAP check: can you actually verify the real world?
Other versions63 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 45
- addyosmani/agent-skills★ 112k14% same
- ollaya-dev/ollaya★ 1.4k14% same
- rizqinrr/viserys-agent★ 55614% same
- shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp★ 17417% same
- sampleXbro/agentsmesh★ 2417% same
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 2217% same
- HK-hub/AgentSkills★ 617% same
- lza6/claw-code-tingfeng★ 518% same
- Marvellbrazil/my-agentic-skills★ 414% same
- PenceZHR/stagepass★ 417% same
35 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 18
- vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh★ 46same name
- jmxt3/gitscape.ai★ 33same name
- ddddjaak/ae-skills★ 4same name
- dzevs/zynk★ 4same name
- oleg494/coding-kit★ 3same name
- bnalwalid/walidforge-skills★ 2same name
- codexskills/agent-forge★ 2same name
- GuillemRoca/agent-skills-android★ 2same name
- NashEQify/forge★ 2same name
- Aleksandr-Litvinenko/agent-skills-ru★ 1same name
8 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use constraint-driven-development, prioritize-assumptions and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MrCipherSmithSkillconstraint-driven-development
Use when a project needs a persistent, measurable quality bar — starting a project without documented standards, 'set up constraints', or when coverage/perf/a11y thresholds get re-debated per-PR. Produces CONSTRAINTS.md with enforceable numbers, ratchets, and a guard against silent weakening. NOT for throwaway prototypes or a one-off CI setup.
Also in 13 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillprioritize-assumptions
Prioritize assumptions using an Impact × Risk matrix and suggest experiments for each. Use when triaging a list of assumptions, deciding what to test first, or applying the assumption prioritization canvas.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-experiments-new
Design lean startup experiments (pretotypes) for a new product. Creates XYZ hypotheses and suggests low-effort validation methods like landing pages, explainer videos, and pre-orders. Use when validating a new product idea, creating pretotypes, or testing market demand.
Also in 4 projects that use this
launchapp-devSkillinterview-script
Create a structured user interview script with warm-up, core exploration, and wrap-up sections. Use when preparing for user research interviews to ensure consistent, insightful conversations.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +2 more from skytiger6724
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- templates/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adapt-skillSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- architecture-analysisSkill
- audit-skillSkill
- backend-api-masterySkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- clarify-skillSkill
- cli-toolsSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- critique-skillSkill
- customize-opencodeSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- debugging-three-strikesSkill
- delight-skillSkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- dev-environment-auditSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- engineering-fundamentalsSkill
- frontend-desktopSkill
- frontend-mobileSkill
- frontend-pwaSkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- frontend-webSkill
- fullstack-shippingSkill
- gateSkill
- git-init-and-versioningSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- hard-skillSkill
- idea-refineSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- industrial-brutalist-uiSkill
- interview-meSkill
- minimalist-uiSkill
- multi-agent-orchestrationSkill
- observability-and-instrumentationSkill
- optimize-skillSkill
- output-skillSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- polish-skillSkill
- project-health-checkSkill
- project-metricsSkill
- redesign-skillSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- self-improvementSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-improverSkill
- soft-premium-uiSkill
- source-driven-developmentSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- typeset-skillSkill
- user-onboardingSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

