agentleFS
jdanigojdanigo/hydraia/skills/dotnet-patterns/SKILL.md

dotnet-patterns

Skill8 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when writing C#/.NET backend code — ASP.NET Core APIs (minimal APIs or MVC), workers, EF Core data access. Builder playbook: layout, DI lifetimes, async/cancellation, EF Core discipline, options pattern, error contract, testing shape. Complements csharp-reviewer.

7 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    No lazy-loading proxies: load explicitly (Include) so every query's shape is visible — N+1 becomes impossible to miss.

    line 28

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

C#/.NET Backend Patterns

Layout

  • Vertical slices (feature folders: endpoint + handler + models per feature) for API-shaped services; full Clean Architecture layering only when the domain genuinely warrants it — record the choice as an ADR either way.
  • Minimal APIs for small/medium surfaces; MVC controllers when filters/model-binding complexity earns it.

DI lifetimes (the classic traps)

  • Scoped services must NEVER be captured by singletons (captive dependency — resolve via IServiceScopeFactory inside the singleton instead).
  • HttpClient via IHttpClientFactory, never new HttpClient() per call (socket exhaustion).
  • Register by interface at the boundary you intend to fake in tests; concrete elsewhere is fine.

Async all the way

  • No .Result/.Wait()/GetAwaiter().GetResult() on async paths — deadlock and threadpool starvation fuel.
  • CancellationToken flows from the endpoint through every service and EF call: await db.Orders.ToListAsync(ct). Endpoints accept it; libraries propagate it.
  • ValueTask only where profiling justifies it; default is Task.

EF Core discipline

  • Reads: AsNoTracking() by default; project to DTOs with Select — never return entities from queries that don't update.
  • No lazy-loading proxies: load explicitly (Include) so every query's shape is visible — N+1 becomes impossible to miss.
  • Migrations: one migration per change, reviewed like code; destructive column changes follow expand-contract (see db-optimization skill).
  • Transactions explicit where multi-write consistency matters (ExecutionStrategy + TransactionScope-free patterns with BeginTransactionAsync).

Config — options pattern

  • IOptions<T> with ValidateDataAnnotations().ValidateOnStart() — invalid config fails the boot, not the first request.
  • Secrets from user-secrets/KeyVault/env — never appsettings committed values.

Error contract

  • ProblemDetails (RFC 9457) via AddProblemDetails(); exceptions mapped centrally (exception handler middleware), typed domain exceptions → status codes. No try/catch per controller.
  • Nullable reference types ON project-wide; warnings as errors for new code.

Testing shape

  • xUnit; unit tests fake at the interface boundary.
  • WebApplicationFactory<Program> for integration tests over the real pipeline (routing, filters, serialization) with a test database (Testcontainers where Docker exists).
  • Snapshot the API surface where the contract matters (Verify/ApiApprovals) so drift is a failing test.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.