agentleFS
jdanigojdanigo/hydraia/skills/api-design/SKILL.md

api-design

Skill8 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when designing or reviewing an API surface — REST, GraphQL, or gRPC. Contract-first methodology: the contract artifact (OpenAPI 3.1, SDL, proto3) is written and reviewed BEFORE implementation, lives in the repo, and Phase 6 verifies implementation matches it.

191 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use db-design, everything-claude-code and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • yuexueyuSkill

    db-design

    数据库工程师技能 - Schema设计、索引优化、并发安全、数据库审计。当你涉及数据库表/字段/索引/SQL/迁移/MCP数据库操作、建表改表、写查询时必须使用此技能。即使用户只是说"加个字段"或"查下数据",也应触发。

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • InfopibeSkill

    everything-claude-code

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • mryeastcodeSkill

    everything-claude-code-conventions

    Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • tpavanipradeepSkill

    nextjs-turbopack

    Next.js 16+ and Turbopack — incremental bundling, FS caching, dev speed, and when to use Turbopack vs webpack.

    Also in 15 projects that use this

  • Indium-AI-LabsSkill

    data-pipeline-design

    Design batch or incremental ETL and ELT pipelines and warehouse models: grain, partitioning, idempotent loads, late-arriving data, data quality tests, PII controls, and cost monitoring, before building them. Use when adding or changing a dbt model, warehouse table, scheduled transformation, or ingestion job. Not for transactional schema design (use the database-design skill) or event-sourced stores (use the event-sourcing-architecture skill).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • thejordanleopoldSkill

    third-party-integration

    Use when integrating with external APIs, payment processors (Stripe), webhooks, or third-party services. Use when implementing API clients with authentication and rate limiting, handling webhooks with signature verification and idempotency, writing contract tests for external services, or isolating third-party dependencies behind adapters. Triggers: \"Stripe\", \"payment integration\", \"webhook\", \"third-party API\", \"external service\", \"API client\", \"integrate with\", \"signature verification\", \"idempotency key\".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Files
SKILL.md

API Design — the contract IS the spec

Contract-first: write the machine-readable contract, review it like code, implement to it. Never code-first with docs generated after.

Style selection (decision table — pick ONE, record an ADR)

Use caseStyle
Public/partner API, resource-shaped, broad client baseREST + OpenAPI 3.1
Product frontend with many views over the same graph, client-driven field selectionGraphQL + SDL
Internal service-to-service, low latency, strong typing across languagesgRPC + proto3

Ambiguous → one question to the human with the trade-off, never two styles at once without justification.

REST rules (OpenAPI 3.1)

  • Contract file in-repo: api/openapi.yaml (or the repo's existing convention). Reviewed in the same PR discipline as code.
  • Resources are plural nouns; no verbs in paths (POST /orders, not /createOrder). Consistent casing (pick kebab or snake for paths, camel for JSON; record it).
  • Methods carry semantics: GET safe, PUT/DELETE idempotent, POST for creation/actions. Idempotency keys for payment-shaped POSTs.
  • Errors: RFC 9457 application/problem+json — every operation lists its error responses in the contract. No bare 500s as design.
  • Pagination: cursor-based by default; offset only with a written justification (deep-page cost). Filtering/sorting as documented query params.
  • Versioning: choose URL prefix (/v1) or header once, record the ADR, never mix.
  • AuthN/authZ in the contract: securitySchemes + per-operation scopes/roles. An operation without a declared auth requirement is a finding, not an oversight.

GraphQL rules (SDL)

  • Schema file in-repo. Nullability is design: non-null by intent, not by default.
  • Typed errors (union results or errors interface) over throwing strings.
  • Pagination: Relay-style connections. N+1: name the dataloader plan at design time.
  • Depth/complexity limits stated in the contract docs (abuse surface).

gRPC rules (proto3)

  • Proto files versioned in-repo; packages versioned (v1).
  • Field numbers are forever: reserve removed numbers, never reuse.
  • Deadlines/timeouts and idempotency noted per RPC; streaming only with a stated reason.

Verification hook (Phase 6)

The implementation must match the contract: routes/fields/status codes vs the contract file (drift check — route list diff, schema validation of real responses where the test suite allows). Contract drift found in verify = the run is not done.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.