agentleFS
impactbrusselsimpactbrussels/FounderOS/skills/positioning-and-gtm/SKILL.md

positioning-and-gtm

Skill2 starsChanged 5 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when a founder is ready to take a product to market and needs to say what it is, who it's for, and why it wins - when they say "how do I describe this", "what's my positioning", "what's our messaging", "which channels should I use", "how do I get to market", "nobody gets what we do", or are about to spray budget across every channel at once. Produces a one-line positioning statement, a messaging hierarchy, and a focused 1-2 channel go-to-market motion. Pair with launch-plan and find-first-customers.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use the April Dunford structure (template in references): for [ICP] who [PROBLEM], [STARTUP_NAME] is a [market category] that, unlike …

    line 40

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Positioning and Go-To-Market

A first-time founder's instinct is to describe the product by its features and then try every channel at once. Both fail. Weak positioning makes customers do the work of figuring out why they should care - most won't. Spreading across ten channels means doing all of them badly. This skill forces the two decisions that matter most before launch: what you are in the customer's mind, and the one or two places you'll go to find them.

The method

Built on the Founder OS scaffold (High tier). Full frameworks in references/positioning.md.

Step 1 - Pin the ICP and the alternative they use today

Positioning is relative. You are not positioning in a vacuum - you're positioning against what [ICP] does right now to solve [PROBLEM]. Name the competitive alternatives honestly: a rival product, a manual workaround, a spreadsheet, a hire, or doing nothing. If you don't know the real alternative, you can't claim to be better - research it first (the founder supplies the domain; you supply the rigour).

Step 2 - Find the unique value, not the feature list

List your attributes (what's true about the product), then translate each into value (what it lets the customer do or avoid). Keep only the attributes that competitive alternatives can't easily claim. The intersection of "true about us" and "rivals can't say this" and "[ICP] cares" is your differentiated value. Everything else is table stakes - mention it, don't lead with it.

Step 3 - Write the one-line positioning statement

Use the April Dunford structure (template in references): for [ICP] who [PROBLEM], [STARTUP_NAME] is a [market category] that, unlike [alternatives], delivers [unique value]. The market category is a strategic choice - it sets the customer's expectations and the comparison set. Pick the frame that makes your strengths obvious. Draft three; pick one. A draft is not a decision - test the line on a real [ICP] before you commit.

Step 4 - Build the messaging hierarchy

One headline (the positioning statement in human words), three supporting value pillars, and the proof under each (metric, demo, testimonial, or logo). This is the source of truth every landing page, pitch, and ad inherits from. Lead with value and outcome, never with features.

Step 5 - Pick 1-2 channels and one GTM motion

Match [CHANNEL] to where [ICP] already is, not where it's easy to post. Use the channel menu + fit signals in references; pick at most two and commit. Then pick the motion - self-serve, sales-led, community-led, or content-led - that fits your price point, deal size, and [CONSTRAINT]. Batch the channel experiments, then decide based on [METRIC], not vibes.

Output

  • Positioning statement (one line, Dunford structure) + the two runner-up framings and why you rejected them.
  • Messaging hierarchy: headline, 3 value pillars, proof under each.
  • Channel choice: 1-2 channels with the fit signal that justifies each, and the ones you're deliberately not doing.
  • GTM motion with a one-line rationale tied to price/deal-size/[CONSTRAINT].
  • First experiment: what you'll test on which channel, the [METRIC], and the bar to continue vs. cut.

Constraints

  • Position against the real alternative, including "do nothing" - not against an imaginary competitor.
  • Lead with value and outcome, never a feature dump. Features go in the proof layer.
  • Pick at most two channels. "Be everywhere" is a budget for failing everywhere.
  • The market category is a deliberate choice, not the literal name of your tech.
  • Stay theme-agnostic; the founder supplies the domain, you supply the structure.

Copy-paste version

Act as a sharp B2B/B2C positioning and go-to-market strategist for a first-time founder.
My product: [ONE_LINER]. Who it's for: [ICP]. The problem it solves: [PROBLEM].
My constraints (budget/time/team): [CONSTRAINT].
Help me:
1. Name the REAL alternatives my [ICP] uses today (including spreadsheets, workarounds, and doing nothing).
2. Turn my features into VALUE, and keep only the value that rivals can't easily claim and my [ICP] actually cares about.
3. Write 3 one-line positioning statements in this shape: "For [ICP] who [PROBLEM], [STARTUP_NAME] is a [market category] that, unlike [alternatives], delivers [unique value]." Then recommend one and tell me why.
4. Give me a messaging hierarchy: 1 headline, 3 value pillars, and the proof I'd need under each.
5. Recommend the 1-2 channels where my [ICP] already hangs out, and ONE go-to-market motion (self-serve / sales-led / community / content) that fits my price and constraints. Tell me what NOT to do.
Don't let me lead with features, and don't let me pick more than two channels.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.