principle-prove-it-works
Skill1 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Apply after finishing an analysis, pipeline change, notebook, chart, or model, before reporting a number as done. Verify against the real artifact: a clean re-run by the human, the actual output values in the pasted summary, the rendered chart. Do not rely on a saved output, a self-report, or 'it runs'.
49 other projects use a version of this, 44 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- paramcodes/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tristanphvn/keeledited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- requie/endostacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- creedants/pstack-t3edited, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- painhardcore/pstackedited, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- christofferbergj/agent-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-pstack, poteto-help and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
bnemaSkillsetup-pstack
Configure which Pi models pstack uses per role. Detects available provider/model specs and writes pstack's user configuration. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", or changing pstack model choices.
Also in 25 projects that use this
ianclearySkillpoteto-help
Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.
Also in 14 projects that use this
eryzerzSkillmake-bot-ui
Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.
Also in 19 projects that use this
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 11 projects that use this
JoshueOsunaSkillPoteto Mode
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work. Use for poteto, /poteto-mode, or requests to work in this style.
Also in 3 projects that use this
instructureSkillketchup
Rebuild context after /clear by analyzing uncommitted changes across Canvas LMS and all plugin repositories
Also in 18 projects that use this
Other versions49 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 44
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8k21% same
- jtaroreh/agystack★ 12814% same
- uzairansaruzi/p3-stack★ 12621% same
- dsebban/skills★ 7120% same
- The-AIE/the-gibson★ 4421% same
- creedants/pstack-t3★ 1821% same
- painhardcore/pstack★ 1821% same
- Scino/fstack★ 1813% same
- mariusflorescu/pstack-t3★ 1321% same
- adjohn/pstack★ 921% same
34 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 5
- TheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyone★ 21same name
- requie/endostack★ 4same name
- jaydubya818/MissionControl★ 2same name
- 3metaJun/mstack★ 0same name
- jamesdebatty/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository50 other files it gives its agents.
- analyst-modeSkill
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- astack-helpSkill
- benchmark-checklistSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- catch-upSkill
- correctSkill
- create-formal-verification-skillSkill
- figure-it-outSkill
- howSkill
- interrogateSkill
- in-your-own-wordsSkill
- maintain-formal-verification-skillSkill
- no-commentsSkill
- plain-wordsSkill
- principle-attack-the-premiseSkill
- principle-boundary-disciplineSkill
- principle-build-the-leverSkill
- principle-define-the-questionSkill
- principle-encode-lessons-in-structureSkill
- principle-experience-firstSkill
- principle-explain-the-numberSkill
- principle-fix-root-causesSkill
- principle-foundational-thinkingSkill
- principle-guard-the-context-windowSkill
- principle-laziness-protocolSkill
- principle-make-operations-idempotentSkill
- principle-minimize-reader-loadSkill
- principle-model-the-domainSkill
- principle-name-the-estimandSkill
- principle-never-block-on-the-humanSkill
- principle-reproduce-from-clean-stateSkill
- principle-respect-the-grainSkill
- principle-sequence-verifiable-unitsSkill
- principle-simulate-the-methodSkill
- principle-subtract-before-you-addSkill
- principle-test-behavior-not-implementationSkill
- recallSkill
- reflectSkill
- retail-analyticsSkill
- sharpenSkill
- show-me-your-workSkill
- statechartSkill
- swarmSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- unslopSkill
- whySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 1 is common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
1
Common
Most of the 49 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 8
Verify every output by checking the real thing directly.
- Distinctive: line 14
Check that a job ran by reading the output table's latest date or row count, not the job's status log.
- Distinctive: line 15
Read the actual value, not a cached summary.
- Distinctive: line 16
Look at the rendered chart, not only the code that builds it.
- Distinctive: line 17
When verification fails, suspect the check before the system.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 49 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Prove It Works
Verify every output by checking the real thing directly. Do not infer from proxies, self-reports, saved outputs, or "it ran without errors".
Unverified work has unknown correctness. Indirect checks feel cheaper than direct observation, and acting on a wrong inference costs far more than checking the source.
- The human re-executes from clean state through a run request, and you read the values in the pasted output. A notebook passes when a fresh run produces the numbers, not when the saved outputs look right (see principle-reproduce-from-clean-state).
- Prove the code and the checks on synthetic data first. Run them yourself, and feed each check a known bad input so it fails. A run on real data then tests the data, not your code.
- Check that a job ran by reading the output table's latest date or row count, not the job's status log.
- Read the actual value, not a cached summary. Reconcile a total against an independent source.
- Look at the rendered chart, not only the code that builds it. Render it on synthetic data yourself, and read the real render the human shares. Check each plotted number against the source in the check script.
- When verification fails, suspect the check before the system. A filter in your check query, a stale cache file, or a timezone mismatch in the comparison is the usual cause.
The strongest proof is a deterministic check script that reruns the same comparison, not a one-time look. Write it as a re-runnable uv run script that prints only aggregates and PASS/FAIL lines. Run it on synthetic data, hand the real run to the human, and keep the pasted output as an artifact a reviewer can rerun. Commit the check only for large or complex work where the trail must be auditable later (see show-me-your-work).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

