no-comments
Skill1 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Spawn the comment-critic agent on a data repo's code, notebooks, or SQL, act on its accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints. Use for /astack:no-comments or when cleaning up comments in a diff.
68 other projects use a version of this, 51 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- remotion-dev/remotiontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- paramcodes/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- endqwerty/endstackedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tristanphvn/keeledited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- therealmarzouq/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- salasebas/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use poteto-help, setup-pstack and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ianclearySkillpoteto-help
Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.
Also in 13 projects that use this
bnemaSkillsetup-pstack
Configure which Pi models pstack uses per role. Detects available provider/model specs and writes pstack's user configuration. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", or changing pstack model choices.
Also in 22 projects that use this
eryzerzSkillmake-bot-ui
Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.
Also in 16 projects that use this
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 10 projects that use this
instructureSkillketchup
Rebuild context after /clear by analyzing uncommitted changes across Canvas LMS and all plugin repositories
Also in 17 projects that use this
Other versions68 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 51
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8k52% same
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 66752% same
- jtaroreh/agystack★ 12871% same
- uzairansaruzi/p3-stack★ 12661% same
- dsebban/skills★ 7169% same
- overextended/skills★ 2240% same
- creedants/pstack-t3★ 1841% same
- painhardcore/pstack★ 1859% same
- Scino/fstack★ 1864% same
- mariusflorescu/pstack-t3★ 1353% same
41 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 17
- remotion-dev/remotion★ 72ksame name
- Dimon94/dverity★ 107same name
- Dimon94/skills★ 107same name
- TheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyone★ 21same name
- cutfac/cutfac★ 14same name
- educlopez/mallard★ 4same name
- requie/endostack★ 4same name
- stainless-code/lossless★ 4same name
- fullerzz/agent-skills★ 2same name
- niksavis/basicly★ 2same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository50 other files it gives its agents.
- analyst-modeSkill
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- astack-helpSkill
- benchmark-checklistSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- catch-upSkill
- correctSkill
- create-formal-verification-skillSkill
- figure-it-outSkill
- howSkill
- interrogateSkill
- in-your-own-wordsSkill
- maintain-formal-verification-skillSkill
- plain-wordsSkill
- principle-attack-the-premiseSkill
- principle-boundary-disciplineSkill
- principle-build-the-leverSkill
- principle-define-the-questionSkill
- principle-encode-lessons-in-structureSkill
- principle-experience-firstSkill
- principle-explain-the-numberSkill
- principle-fix-root-causesSkill
- principle-foundational-thinkingSkill
- principle-guard-the-context-windowSkill
- principle-laziness-protocolSkill
- principle-make-operations-idempotentSkill
- principle-minimize-reader-loadSkill
- principle-model-the-domainSkill
- principle-name-the-estimandSkill
- principle-never-block-on-the-humanSkill
- principle-prove-it-worksSkill
- principle-reproduce-from-clean-stateSkill
- principle-respect-the-grainSkill
- principle-sequence-verifiable-unitsSkill
- principle-simulate-the-methodSkill
- principle-subtract-before-you-addSkill
- principle-test-behavior-not-implementationSkill
- recallSkill
- reflectSkill
- retail-analyticsSkill
- sharpenSkill
- show-me-your-workSkill
- statechartSkill
- swarmSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- unslopSkill
- whySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 66 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Use the caller's files or diff.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 66 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
No comments
Spawn the astack:comment-critic agent. Act on accepted findings.
Defer to the comment-critic's fresh perspective.
Scope
Use the caller's files or diff. Otherwise use the current diff against main, including uncommitted edits: git diff $(git merge-base main HEAD). Notebook markdown cells that narrate code count as comments. Markdown that states a finding for a reader stays in the findings report and is out of scope.
Steps
- Spawn the
Agenttool withsubagent_typeastack:comment-critic. Pass the scope. Do not restate its rules. - Inspect its report and diff. Reject application-code edits, scope escapes, exception-protected deletions, misstated
MUST KILLreasons, and flags that treat kept intentional code as guilty. Reshape flags on our-code surprises stay actionable. Do not restore those comments. A keep survives only with proof it is about something we cannot change. Audit missed scoped lint and type suppressions (# noqa,# type: ignore,# ty: ignore, and the SQL or notebook equivalents). Correctness or safety suppressions stay actionableMUST KILLs. Restore deletions only with exact exceptions and scoped proof. Before accepting thinIMPORTANTordo not removekills or keeps, run the how or why skill on their symbol. If a kill is ambiguous, do not restore. If a keep is refuted or still ambiguous, delete it. Revert and rerun one rejected report with the failure named. Reject a second, report it open, and fail/astack:no-comments. - Fix trivial accepted flags directly by deleting a dead path, dropping a parameter, or using the real API. If any fix needs a shape, run the architect skill once for the accepted set and surrounding code. Stop at the sketch. Architect shapes. Step 4 implements.
- Implement the smallest root-cause fix in scope. Remove every named workaround. If the root cause is out of scope, land the smallest in-scope fix and report the rest open. The principle-fix-root-causes skill guides intent only. It does not authorize widening the fence nor fixing instances outside it. Never bolt on symptom guards.
- Constraint comments say
do not remove,do not change wording, ortalk to X before changing. Leave keeps about things we cannot change. Offer the cheapest in-scope type, runtime, test, or lint check, such as aruffrule or a schema assertion. Wait for interactive approval. Unattended and eval runs require caller pre-approval. If approved, encode then delete. Otherwise delete, report the constraint open, and sketch out-of-scope work. - Report the deletion count, restored comments, reruns, architect sketch, fixes, encoding offers, encodings, unenforced constraints, and other open work.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

