concept-testing
Skill15 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub
Structure concept test protocols, analyze reactions, preference rankings.
In this repository47 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- affinity-mappingSkill
- empathy-mappingSkill
- hmw-statementsSkill
- journey-mappingSkill
- jtbd-analysisSkill
- kappa-thematic-analysisSkill
- persona-creationSkill
- prioritization-matrixSkill
- research-synthesisSkill
- taxonomy-generatorSkill
- thematic-analysisSkill
- user-flow-mappingSkill
- design-system-auditSkill
- handoff-documentationSkill
- longitudinal-trackingSkill
- nps-analysisSkill
- regression-impactSkill
- repository-curationSkill
- research-retroSkill
- stakeholder-presentationSkill
- sus-umux-scoringSkill
- task-analysis-quantSkill
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- card-sortingSkill
- cognitive-walkthroughSkill
- design-critiqueSkill
- heuristic-evaluationSkill
- prototype-feedbackSkill
- tree-testingSkill
- usability-testingSkill
- workshop-facilitationSkill
- accessibility-auditSkill
- analytics-reviewSkill
- channel-research-deploymentSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- contextual-inquirySkill
- desk-researchSkill
- diary-studiesSkill
- field-studiesSkill
- interview-question-generatorSkill
- stakeholder-interviewsSkill
- survey-ai-detectionSkill
- survey-designSkill
- survey-generatorSkill
- user-interviewsSkill
The file
Files
Concept Testing
Structure concept test protocols, analyze reactions, preference rankings.
Phase
Double Diamond: Develop
Type
Mixed research method
Workflow
- Plan — Generate a research plan with objectives, methods, and timeline
- Execute — Process input data (files, context) through the analysis
- Validate — Self-check findings against sources, score confidence
- Report — Structured output with nuggets, facts, insights, recommendations
Input
- Project files (PDF, DOCX, TXT, CSV, MD)
- Project and company context (auto-loaded)
- User instructions and task context
Output
- Nuggets with source references
- Facts verified against evidence
- Insights with confidence scoring
- Actionable recommendations with priority/effort ratings
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.